HELP!...NEED ADVICE!!!

[NiNe2FiVe]

Jr, wait 2 days and call that bitch back and tell her "From my cold dead hands bitch" then hang up.

 

[I AM]

she gona call the cops , the cops gona be mad at u cuz u knew damn well ur check wasnt no 900 bux. and u kept the extra money that isnt urs, im shure thers some bullshyt law on it, but ya im pretty shure u can git in sum shyt if u dont pay her back



thas jus real advice...

SHE isn't the owner of the money.

The COMPANY IS.

The bosses don't know, CAUSE THAT BITCH CAME SOLO ON HER OWN ACCORD.

Jesus you guys are FUCKING ridiculous. CAN YOU READ? LOL

If she came alone, the bosses don't know. She's fucked. She's tryign to THREATEN HIM TO SCARE HIM to giving her that shit back cause SHE WILL GET FIRED CAUSE IT'S HER FUCK UP.

Holy fuck. THE SICCNESS HAS OFFICIALLY TURNED PUSSUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[MEXCOM]

great legal analysis from mexcom

Ironically....much better than yours.

Manslaughter involves other factors to make up for the lack of intent, like reckless or criminally negligent behavior

Uh...no shit. That was my point. You're the one dealing in absolutes. Moron.

running a red light and fucking an underage girl are statutory and dont require intent.\

No shit. Once again this was my point. LOL @ you trying to argue what I'm exposing as your lack of intelligence as one of your points.

I guess you are in law school. Seeing as how your reading comprehension skills are so strong.


Kudos buddy! You fucking koala.

 

[Mr. Nice Guy]

Knowingly accepting ANY money that isn't yours without first squaring it away is simply illegal bruh.

The court still has the burden of PROVING he knowingly accepted the money, which would be a very difficult feat.

If this ever went to court the prosecutor would through it out in a second, especially in a large metropolitan area.

 

[MEXCOM]

You must not be doing close to the top of your class then.

Because if you take somebody else welfare check off the table (or say, accept an overpayment of 450 dollars) and then just continually "think" its your paycheck: 1) You're a fucking idiot who obviously can't read his own name; 2) Anybody who goes to cash said check is going to realize the name on the check doesn't match your own damn name, and 3) You're NOT acting "in good faith" because the law expects you not be a half-wit retard and do your part in ensuring any check you cash has your own name on it (you know, that's that "Negligent behavior" you spoke of).

/Thread


But then again all crimes require an intent....right?

I guess dude better open up his fucking books o' learning and look up mens rea because every crime I gave at him is one where intent is not necessary in order for one to be prosecuted.

 

[FatBlunts209]

put the 450 on one blackjack hand

LMAO

 

[Rusto]

/Thread


But then again all crimes require an intent....right?

.

Right. There are very few exceptions

 

[MEXCOM]

lol

 

[I AM]

Kudos buddy! You fucking koala.

This made me LOL

 

[Rusto]

Ironically....much better than yours..

no it wasnt

Uh...no shit. That was my point. You're the one dealing in absolutes. Moron.

These are the exceptions. But we arent dealing with manslaughter or statutory rape now are we? Dont bring up the 2 things you actually know about to try to make it seem you know about law.

No shit. Once again this was my point. LOL @ you trying to argue what I'm exposing as your lack of intelligence as one of your points.

again, you brought up a traffic infraction and statutory rape scenario. Actually, i take it back stautory rape DOES require intent,...intent to have sex. It does not require you to know the girl is underage.

I guess you are in law school. Seeing as how your reading comprehension skills are so strong.

OOOOHHHH, you really fucking got me there! How about next time you actually say something with substance and we will see how you do.



Im done dealing with 35 year old siccness characters members with a superiority complex.

Kudos to you for contributing nothing to the thread

 

[Rusto]

lol

come on mexcom, prove me wrong instead of "lol"ing

and LOL @ you for trying to argue that crimes dont require intent

ALL CRIMES REQUIRING A CULPABLE MENTAL STATE (like stealing from a check cashing place ) REQUIRE INTENT

I understand this concept might be too complex for your 35 year old failing brain to grasp, but at least try harder next time

 

[Nuttkase]

 

[Rusto]

/Thread


But then again all crimes require an intent....right?

I guess dude better open up his fucking books o' learning and look up mens rea because every crime I gave at him is one where intent is not necessary in order for one to be prosecuted.

LMAO!!!
You missed the entire point of dudes post.
God damn you are fucking dumb

 

[500sd]

im just readin this whole thread , and all i have to say is mexcom...you look straight retarded right now
trying to argue with a law school student about the law?
dayum

 

[Rusto]

im just readin this whole thread , and all i have to say is mexcom...you look straight retarded right now
trying to argue with a law school student about the law?
dayum

watch out, mexcom gonna be back any minute now telling us about how successful he is and how much money he makes off his bachelors

 

[Likwid]

1. You need a better job, 450 bucks a week? or even two weeks?

2. Some woman is going to lose her job because you're not a stand-up dude, which is probably why you get paid peanuts.

3. Karma is a bitch, one day you're going to put too many big macs in someones drive thru bag, and your ass is going to get promoted to customer.

 

[L.D.S.]

I think Junior pulled a swift one on the Siccness.


















That, or he really got arrested.

 

[MEXCOM]

These are the exceptions. But we arent dealing with manslaughter or statutory rape now are we? Dont bring up the 2 things you actually know about to try to make it seem you know about law.

ZOMG!

You mean there are exceptions to the law?

As in my initial point was that there are laws where in intent is not necessary to find a person culpable? But didn't you say in order for a crime to be committed one must have intent only to be proven than in fact intent is NOT necessary to commit a crime? I think the answer is a very resounding yes.

These are the exceptions. But we arent dealing with manslaughter or statutory rape now are we? Dont bring up the 2 things you actually know about to try to make it seem you know about law.

Intent and recklessness are two completely different things.

Your usage of the word intent is very loose at best. I can intend to have sex with a person who turns up to be underage. So what? That doesn't mean I intended to have sex with a minor. I had no malice and my crime wasn't premeditated.

In this case I wouldn't need intent to be charged with a crime.

OOOOHHHH, you really fucking got me there! How about next time you actually say something with substance and we will see how you do.

What Law School are you in?

Berkeley? Stanford? Santa Clara? USF?

Because judging from your dumb ass, I can't see an accredited University taking you in as a student.

Im done dealing with 35 year old siccness characters members with a superiority complex.

LOL!

 

[L.D.S.]

The next step in this word battle for you, MEXCOM, is the acquisition of RUSTO's IP so you can trace it to his address and rape him.

 

[MEXCOM]

watch out, mexcom gonna be back any minute now telling us about how successful he is and how much money he makes off his bachelors

Masters.

In Urban Planning.

You don't get to work mitigating with redevelopment agencies and NIMBY's, interpreting California's Land use and planning law, dealing with encroachment, or a counties smart growth vision by being some dumb ass kid on the Siccness that still hasn't gotten their Juris Doctor.