let me school you one more time...
I can intend to have sex with a person who turns up to be underage. So what? That doesn't mean I intended to have sex with a minor. I had no malice and my crime wasn't premeditated.
if you intend to have sex with a person who "turns up" to be underage, its a "strict liability" crime...and you will only be criminally liable for the age component. So unless someone grabbed your dick and put it in a 13 year old while you were asleep, you intended to have sex with the person, and mistake isnt a defense.
But we arent talking about statutes
As in my initial point was that there are laws where in intent is not necessary to find a person culpable? But didn't you say in order for a crime to be committed one must have intent only to be proven than in fact intent is NOT necessary to commit a crime? I think the answer is a very resounding yes.
unless we are taling about homicide crimes, which only needs criminal negligence/recklessness in certain cases to convict, then yea,....there must be intent. But no, we are discussing a dude that was given extra cash at a check cashing joint. Stop trying to read between the lines acting like youre all slick.
What Law School are you in?
USD law
Because judging from your dumb ass, I can't see an accredited University taking you in as a student.
you judged wrong