All-Pro Football 2K8.... FUCK MADDEN!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

MURK

Sicc OG
Oct 18, 2003
1,165
0
0
37
www.myspace.com
#82
once again 2k trys to make up for the shitty game play by havin a decent presentation

gameplay is trash

by playing the demo i can honestly say this game sucks

i wanted to like it
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#83
I think you're too used to Madden and NCAA, you trying to run out of the pocket with your QB, or some shit. I can understand if you said there weren't enough features, but you really don't think the gameplay is any good? Can you be more specific? What about the gameplay do you not like? My only guesses is that you're a passer, and don't like how APF is focused on the run, as real football is. 75% of football is run offense. You should be running about 2 out of every 3 downs.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
38
#84
Come on.. Most teams don't actually run 75% of the time.

It's closer to 55-45 for most teams.. Some teams actually pass more than they run.

Lets look at the superbowl just for a random game to choose from.

Indianapolis: 39 Passing Plays, 42 Rushing Plays
Chicago: 29 Passing Plays, 19 Rushing Plays

..

Look at the round previous..

Indianapolis: 50 Passing Plays, 30 Rushing Plays
New England: 35 Passing Plays, 24 Rushing Plays

New Orleans: 52 Passing Plays, 12 Rushing Plays
Chicago: 26 Passing Plays, 46 Rushing Plays

3 Game Total:

Passing: 231 Plays - 57%
Rushing: 173 Plays - 43%

It seems to be high in passing, but I've never actually tried putting together stats like that. But, no way is football 75% run and 25% pass.. Maybe in the 1960s.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#86
Robby2Slobby said:
Come on.. Most teams don't actually run 75% of the time.

It's closer to 55-45 for most teams.. Some teams actually pass more than they run.

Lets look at the superbowl just for a random game to choose from.

Indianapolis: 39 Passing Plays, 42 Rushing Plays
Chicago: 29 Passing Plays, 19 Rushing Plays

..

Look at the round previous..

Indianapolis: 50 Passing Plays, 30 Rushing Plays
New England: 35 Passing Plays, 24 Rushing Plays

New Orleans: 52 Passing Plays, 12 Rushing Plays
Chicago: 26 Passing Plays, 46 Rushing Plays

3 Game Total:

Passing: 231 Plays - 57%
Rushing: 173 Plays - 43%

It seems to be high in passing, but I've never actually tried putting together stats like that. But, no way is football 75% run and 25% pass.. Maybe in the 1960s.
It's actually high in passing because most of those games one team was playing catchup and didn't have time to pass (Bears behind in points to Colts, Saints way behind to Bears, etc.).

Playoff stats aren't usually the best, but yes, you're correct, it's usually around 55% to 45% pass/run. Some teams run more, but it all depends on the team.
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#87
MURK said:
i dont know it just seems slow as hell

and i mostly am a passer but i dont scramble with the qb

Do you let the QB drop back and plant his feet before you throw? Most Madden people don't realize how the passing works in 2K games...

If you don't like it, you don't like it... Just never heard anybody straight up say the gameplay is garbage.

I might have been a little off on my numbers, but it's still nowhere near the 80-90% passing that I see regularly on Madden.

Side note, Is it just me, or are the graphics on NCAA 08 worse than 07? Did they do that to get it to run at 60fps?
 
Apr 14, 2004
1,013
2
38
#88
hell yea i never liked madde, to complicated. nfl 2k3 for ps2 was fuckin sick. and simple and easy to play. this shit guna be classic here also.
 
Nov 10, 2006
98
0
0
39
#90
this game FUCKING SUCKS ASS!!

one of the worst games ever created...not brainwashed, not an ea fanboy, im a old 2k fan, but this game is fucking horrible. im talking i will punch you in the face for bringing it over to play retarded. the entire internet agrees as well. i can post 100 links that agree. do not rent, buy, play, bootleg this. nothing. this game is fucking trash.
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#91
for every 100 links you post of people that hate it, I can post 100 of people that love it. Every rating I have seen for APF and NCAA 08 have all recieved the exact same rating, an 8 out of 10.

Game Informer gave both games an 8, Official Xbox Magazine gave both games an 8. IGN gave both games an 8... see the pattern there? If Madden gets higher than an 8, I'll be surprised.


Hell, NCAA 08 for the regular xbox got a 9...



Here, I'll start you off with three major gaming boards that all think APF is a good game, most think it is better than NCAA:

Gamefaqs - http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/gentopic.php?board=938065

IGN - http://boards.ign.com/board.asp?brd=6054

Gamespot - http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/sports/...ml?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;forums
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#94
The irony is that Visual Concepts (the people behind the 2K series) used to create the 16-bit Madden games for EA.
Frankly, that's when the Madden series was actually good.

Ever since Madden was commisioned to Tiburon, it's been mediocre.
Not bad, pretty good actually, but never great like it used to be.
The Madden series has never been able to fully transition to 3D polygons.

For this, Madden just sucks compared to the 2K series.
And EA sucking even harder as a publisher/developer is another story of its own :)
 
Apr 16, 2003
14,728
1,355
113
41
google.com
It's all one big conspiracy to him. It's the world vs. 2ksports. Madden is the better game. People like madden more than 2k games just look at the numbers but oh wait, all madden fans are just sheep right?

And to say that the old school 16 bit versions were better than nowadays is incredibly crazy talk. Graphics are better, more features....am I missing something?