Sexy USA gymnast knocks out frat boy Video

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
37
#21
So people dont get turned off by what an actual girls age may appear as, but only the number?

So if she is 17, she is a no go, but becuase she is 21, its OK? Doesnt the fact that she LOOKS llike a fuckin KID, turn ANYONE off?

I dont know about yall, but she LOOKS like she is a fuckin teenager. Not into the whole kiddie thing.
i was watching something on discovery health or something that adults that find teens attractive didnt get enough ass a youngin basically...im 19 years old and disgusted when fools twice my age or in thier 20s thinkin a lil tween like shawn johnson or other youngins are some sort of sex symbols.....:hurt::hurt:
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22
So people dont get turned off by what an actual girls age may appear as, but only the number?

So if she is 17, she is a no go, but becuase she is 21, its OK? Doesnt the fact that she LOOKS llike a fuckin KID, turn ANYONE off?

I dont know about yall, but she LOOKS like she is a fuckin teenager. Not into the whole kiddie thing.
she doesn't look like a kid you dope, she looks young but definitely mature enough to have big titties and whatnot.

And lets say if she was 17, there isn't anything wrong with being attracted to that person, especially if they look physically mature. Now it's another thing to want to pursue a relationship with a teenager or whatever, obviously that's wrong.

Generally speaking I feel you though, I mean I'm typically attracted to women in their late 20's, but I'm just sayin.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#23
she doesn't look like a kid you dope, she looks young but definitely mature enough to have big titties and whatnot.

And lets say if she was 17, there isn't anything wrong with being attracted to that person, especially if they look physically mature. Now it's another thing to want to pursue a relationship with a teenager or whatever, obviously that's wrong.
LOL @ "you dope"


There is nothing wrong with being attracted to 17 or even 16 year olds sometimes. Its not like at 17 years and 364 days she is unattractive and one day later she is a bad bitch.

Men have evolved to find women attractive once they are able to reproduce. Since most women can have children at 16 and 17 it only stands to reason that we as men would be attracted to them.

Before we decided that 18 was the arbitrary age of socially acceptable attraction, a lot of older men were jamming younger (15/16/17) year old girls. If they had waited until females were 18-19-20 then both the parents would probably be dead before the kids ever turned 10 lol.

If you are an adult male finding yourself attracted to women when they are 13 or 14...... then sir, you have a problem :confused:
 
Aug 12, 2002
10,103
24
0
www.veronicamoser.com
#36
So people dont get turned off by what an actual girls age may appear as, but only the number?

So if she is 17, she is a no go, but becuase she is 21, its OK? Doesnt the fact that she LOOKS llike a fuckin KID, turn ANYONE off?

I dont know about yall, but she LOOKS like she is a fuckin teenager. Not into the whole kiddie thing.
I understand what you're saying, but she doesn't need to have dual hip replacements and Alzhiemers to prove to me that she's of-age. She looks about 20 or so to me, so I'm not feeling the least bit guilty...(I'm talking about Sacramone, not the 4' 9'' midget).
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#37
i was watching something on discovery health or something that adults that find teens attractive didnt get enough ass a youngin basically...im 19 years old and disgusted when fools twice my age or in thier 20s thinkin a lil tween like shawn johnson or other youngins are some sort of sex symbols.....:hurt::hurt:
Amen.

she doesn't look like a kid you dope, she looks young but definitely mature enough to have big titties and whatnot.
Thats geat. Guess what..she doesnt have "big titties and whatnot", that one of the goddamn reasosn she looks so fuckin young.

And lets say if she was 17, there isn't anything wrong with being attracted to that person, especially if they look physically mature.
Which she doesnt look to be, that is my whole point. She APPEARS to lok much YOUNGER than 21.

Now it's another thing to want to pursue a relationship with a teenager or whatever, obviously that's wrong.
Given the chance, many men would do it unfortunetly...

Generally speaking I feel you though, I mean I'm typically attracted to women in their late 20's, but I'm just sayin.
:cool:

LOL @ "you dope"


There is nothing wrong with being attracted to 17 or even 16 year olds sometimes. Its not like at 17 years and 364 days she is unattractive and one day later she is a bad bitch.

Men have evolved to find women attractive once they are able to reproduce. Since most women can have children at 16 and 17 it only stands to reason that we as men would be attracted to them.

Before we decided that 18 was the arbitrary age of socially acceptable attraction, a lot of older men were jamming younger (15/16/17) year old girls. If they had waited until females were 18-19-20 then both the parents would probably be dead before the kids ever turned 10 lol.

If you are an adult male finding yourself attracted to women when they are 13 or 14...... then sir, you have a problem :confused:
I agree with this post. We are all programed to find women under 18 untouchable, and it is the law in some countries (US being one of them), becuase it is immoral and we feel that women under the age of 18 cannot think for themselves and understand or know what is right and what it wrong. This can be debated forever and no answer will ever come about.

This gymnast just loooks young. I dont care if she was 35 years old, the fact that she APPEARS to look 17 years old, is a turn off to ME.

she is 21

if you say you wont fuck this broad, your sexuality is in question
If you dont find a woman who looks like a 15 year old a turn off, then more power to you. I can certainly find a woman who is over 18 and doesnt have the body of a middle schooler.

ya'll trippin. she looks her age.
I thought she was 21? Most 21 year olds i know arent 4'9" and use wall paper for a bra.

All im sayin is, i dont find her pre-pubesent lookin self attractive.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#38
Thats geat. Guess what..she doesnt have "big titties and whatnot", that one of the goddamn reasosn she looks so fuckin young.
Nah man, she look about 20 imo. The reason I felt guilty was because I assumed all them broads were teenagers, like they usually are in the olympics.
I mean I don't pay attention to these women acrobatic sports, but I remember being young and watchin the olympics and the girls were all like 14 and shit.

If I saw this broad in the streets or somewhere I'd say she's around 20.


Given the chance, many men would do it unfortunetly...
Yep, it's fucked up.

Thats geat. Guess what..she doesnt have "big titties and whatnot"
huh? I dunno this picture here looks like she got big titties:


Maybe it's an optical illusion
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#39
If I saw this broad in the streets or somewhere I'd say she's around 20.
I saw a special on her during the Olympics, and she was with a group of other gymnists working out. All the other girls looked to be 15 and under, so i figured she was too. When i found out she was 21, i honestly thought that they were lying. She looks THAT young to me.


huh? I dunno this picture here looks like she got big titties:


Maybe it's an optical illusion
You have to think of proportion here...she is 4'9"...that broad is TINY.

Nothing is going to change my mind about her. She looks like a HS freshman and it creeps me out.

Im done.