Champ Bailey
- Thread starter FATAL NYGHTMARE
- Start date
I got this info from a Denver Bronco fan website. Pretty close to the stats that were given during the game the other nite. and this was posted back in July, so no way these guys could have just heard it said and been repeating it.
This was also said, and may be an explanation of what we're talking about. But Im really not sure.
http://sports.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/06/champ-bailey-vs-deion-sanders/
This was also said, and may be an explanation of what we're talking about. But Im really not sure.
http://sports.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/06/champ-bailey-vs-deion-sanders/
I've seen the same stats displayed somewhere a few yers back.
They keep stats of everything. Sometimes the stats are hard to find.. But this particular one was clearly not just the announcer saying it, when they interviewed Champ himself he said "I still allowed 5 or 6 completions." The official number is 4.
I don't see why some of you can't handle it.
They keep stats of everything. Sometimes the stats are hard to find.. But this particular one was clearly not just the announcer saying it, when they interviewed Champ himself he said "I still allowed 5 or 6 completions." The official number is 4.
I don't see why some of you can't handle it.
damn bro....How much more proof do you need. It was said by a commentator during the game, a commentator who is fed stats the entire time and studies football for a living. Champ said it himself after the game. I also posted links to 2 dif quotes taken from other sites saying the same exact thing. Yes, they were not "official" stats taken from NFL.Com, but dont you think it's kind of a coinsidence that many people would be saying the same exact thing? I really dont think people are out to hype this dude up that much that there would be a conspiracy to tell the public lies about what the dude did last season.
damn bro....How much more proof do you need. It was said by a commentator during the game, a commentator who is fed stats the entire time and studies football for a living. Champ said it himself after the game. I also posted links to 2 dif quotes taken from other sites saying the same exact thing. Yes, they were not "official" stats taken from NFL.Com, but dont you think it's kind of a coinsidence that many people would be saying the same exact thing? I really dont think people are out to hype this dude up that much that there would be a conspiracy to tell the public lies about what the dude did last season.
Those links with the stats were meaningless. They didn’t answer how many throws were to the guy he was covering or how many catches were made. Feel free to show me if I missed it.
I don’t NEED anything…I’m not gonna lose sleep over it one way or another. I just see a bunch of people overly impressed with a couple of stats that may not even be true. And yes, I said overly impressed.
When you play against scrub Huard, Green coming back from being knocked out, Walter two times, Big Ben back from his accident, Frye in his first year starting, Rivers in his first year starting, Leinart in his first year, Smith finishing up his first full year…I mean…fine…he had a good season…I’m just not ready to annoint him the greatest of all time.
I don’t NEED anything…I’m not gonna lose sleep over it one way or another. I just see a bunch of people overly impressed with a couple of stats that may not even be true. And yes, I said overly impressed.
When you play against scrub Huard, Green coming back from being knocked out, Walter two times, Big Ben back from his accident, Frye in his first year starting, Rivers in his first year starting, Leinart in his first year, Smith finishing up his first full year…I mean…fine…he had a good season…I’m just not ready to annoint him the greatest of all time.
Read between the lines; that's what I was going with.
Porter over Bailey...a single game a few years ago.
Niners as champs. Years ago.
Same thing...
So why is one ok and the other not?
Go figure.
Either way...it's all irrelevent. THIS season is what counts. The topic at hand, if true, is remarkable. All DB's have off days...as do recievers.
Career wise: Porter < Bailey.
Porter over Bailey...a single game a few years ago.
Niners as champs. Years ago.
Same thing...
So why is one ok and the other not?
Go figure.
Either way...it's all irrelevent. THIS season is what counts. The topic at hand, if true, is remarkable. All DB's have off days...as do recievers.
Career wise: Porter < Bailey.
I'm not even trying.
I don’t see your point though. That’s 5 or 6 QB’s out of 16 games.
And I could say he faced Bulger in the first game of his new offense, and McNair in his first season with the Ravens and a new offense (if you want to even call that on offense).
So I'll give you one game against Manning, one against Brady, one against Palmer, and one against Hasselback.
Wow...hall of fame here we come!
I don’t see your point though. That’s 5 or 6 QB’s out of 16 games.
And I could say he faced Bulger in the first game of his new offense, and McNair in his first season with the Ravens and a new offense (if you want to even call that on offense).
So I'll give you one game against Manning, one against Brady, one against Palmer, and one against Hasselback.
Wow...hall of fame here we come!
First of all, Jerry Porter having a good day beating the best CB in the game is nothing like San Francisco winning 5 Championships.
Second, your fellow raider fans are the ones who always whine about things being "in the past," but I guess that only applies with things not pertaining to the Oakland raiders.
Third, I don't think either one is OK if the other isn't. My point was this thread is about Champ's performance LAST YEAR, not 2 or 3 years ago when Jerry Porter had a good day. It just seems like you guys wanna discredit the man by bringing up old shit that makes him look bad. I know that was probably not your intention (I can't say the same for a few others), but that's just what it seems like.
Here's the thing.. I wouldn't go into a thread about the Colts' Championship last year and start talking about how the Niners beat their asses years ago. THAT is the same type of scenario.
Second, your fellow raider fans are the ones who always whine about things being "in the past," but I guess that only applies with things not pertaining to the Oakland raiders.
Third, I don't think either one is OK if the other isn't. My point was this thread is about Champ's performance LAST YEAR, not 2 or 3 years ago when Jerry Porter had a good day. It just seems like you guys wanna discredit the man by bringing up old shit that makes him look bad. I know that was probably not your intention (I can't say the same for a few others), but that's just what it seems like.
Here's the thing.. I wouldn't go into a thread about the Colts' Championship last year and start talking about how the Niners beat their asses years ago. THAT is the same type of scenario.