:shaking my head in:
@EDJ, you're beliefs are rooted in a perverted view of the scriptures. Your beliefs come from a group of people who actually have NWO connections and constantly give false prophecies.
WHEN DID THE SITE CRASHED?
The site crashed shortly after I got here.
I SAID YOU THE ONE THAT MENTIONED QEBER OR QUEBER.AND WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THE COMMON gRAVE FOR ALL MANKIND, NOT THAT HELL=QEBER
EDJ, when you type things such as "THAT QEBER WORD WAS NEVA MENTIONED", and even follow it up with "ONLY YOU HAVE BROUgHT THAT UP", it still leaves room for misinterpretation (as far as what it is you are trying to convey.) Yes, I DID bring the word up because it DOES mean the literal grave yet YOU have FAILED to address its usage in the texts, and no one has said or implied that Qeber/Queber = Hell.
BULLSHIT. WE WENT THOROUgHLY ON THAT SUBJECT AND YOU NEVA ANSWERED
Not true.
#1. HOW CAN A LOVIN' gOD TORTURE HIS OWN CHILDREN?
It is not torture, and God does NOT torture, but because you believe a certain way you think of it as torture. How can a loving God allow his own son to be beaten, mocked, spit on and crucified? How can a loving God allow newborn babies to be slammed against the concrete or burned in ovens? How can a loving God allow for people to do wrong here and recieve no punishment for it? Again, if you understood the PURPOSE of Hell or the Lake of Fire and who it was ORIGINALLY intended for you would understand why a loving God would allow such a thing to happen. Psalm 9:16
Also, I DID answer the question in pasts threads.
#X. IF HELL IS AN ACTUAL PLACE OF TORMENT AND ALL SINNERS BURN FOREVA, THAT VIOLATES THE EYE FOR AN EYE RULE.
You are taking scriptures out of context. First of all, the eye for eye rule was for the Israelites and they were governed by such laws and statutes. The eye for eye rule was COMPENSATION, and in the past I told you to study LEVITICAL and MOSAIC LAW to have a better understaning.
WHY WOULD I BURN FOREVA FOR A MEASELY 80 YEARS(MORE OR LESS, AND THAT'S TAKIN' INTO ACCOUNT THAT EVERY DAY I WAS DOIN' THE MOST DIRT) OF SIN? THE SHIT DON'T ADD UP.
SEE ABOVE. This analogy does not apply to the eye for an eye rule. Again, STUDY Levitical and Mosaic law for a better understanding of it because what you typed has NOTHING to do with it.
#3. 2-0-SIXX CAN FIND THAT POST WHERE WE WENT THUROUgHLY ABOUT THE LAZARUS INCIDENT. CAUSE I EVEN LEFT A BIBLIOgRAPHY WHERE I gOT MY INFO. AND THE SITE DIDN'T gO DOWN THEN. YOU MY FRIEND IS LOSIN' YOUR MEMORY. BUT LIKE I TOLD YOU, LET'S NOT gET INTO THIS. ALL WE DOIN' IS BEATIN' A DEAD HORSE.
No, lets get into it. I did a search on the name and only seven threads came up. I said, "SO IF HELL/PLACE OF TORMENT IS *NOT* REAL THAT WOULD MEAN SEVERAL THINGS" and I also gave a POINT #8 which I said, "8.THE STORY OF LAZARUS WAS SYMBOLIC OF *NOTHING*.
So put them together this is what you get:
SO IF HELL/PLACE OF TORMENT IS *NOT* REAL THAT WOULD MEAN SEVERAL THINGS ONE OF THEM BEING THE STORY OF LAZARUS WAS SYMBOLIC OF *NOTHING*.
What was YOUR response EDJ?
#8) LAZARUS WAS DEAD AND UNCONSCIOUS. HE WAS RESURECTED.
What was MY response to your lack of knowledge?
YOU HAVE *2* MEN NAMED LAZARUS. ONE WHO WAS RESURECTED AND THE ONE WHO WAS FOUND IN LUKE 16:19-ON OUT.
EXPLAIN THE STORY OF LAZARUS AND THE RICH MAN. IF THIS IS A PARABLE KEEP IN MIND THAT IT IS THE *ONLY* PARABLE WHERE A ***PERSONAL*** NAME IS GIVEN.
IF THIS IS A PARABLE WHAT IS IT SYMBOLIC OF?
So, WHEN did you explain it to me EDJ, because I did a search and only seven threads popped up and in the threads I dug up I
NEVER got an answer from you. Please, if 206 can dig him up have him do so, because I would like to see what you're talking about.
BULLSHIT. I QUESTION EVERYTHANg. EVERY INFO PRESENTED I LOOKED UP TO SEE IF IT WAS TRUE OR NOT. I AIN'T TAKIN' MUTHA-FUKAS WORD FOR IT. AND WHEN I LOOKED IT UP, MY CONCLUSION IS THAT THEY WAS SPEAKIN' THE TRUTH.
You have
NEVER went against ANYTHING presented by the JEHOVAH WITNESSES. Name THREE things that the Jehovah Witnesses teach (scripturally) that you
DO NOT agree with.
LOOK ABOVE. AT THE END, IN MY OPINION, THEY SPOKE THE TRUTH.
They spoke what you BELIEVE/ACCEPT as "truth", and because you believe it you are an adherent to their dogma/doctrine.
IT AIN'T CHRISTIAN AND THAT'S WHY YOU REBUKE IT. I FEEL IN YOUR HEART, YOU LOOKIN' FOR TRUTH AND HAVE SEEN THE FALSE WAYS OF THESE SELF PROFESSED "CHRISTIANS". BTW, WHAT IS THE FOLLOWER OF THE WAY?
A Follower of the WAY is a follower of Yeshi. He is the Truth AND the WAY. We have NO organized religion, but WE know who is and isn't a follower because we "feel it". So far, on this board there are only four other people who I can say ARE Followers of the WAY (and this does not include myself.)
THE KEY WORD IS "ASSOCIATED". SO YOU TELLIN' ME THAT YOU ARE LIKE THESE LAWS AND SQUARES AND WANT TO LABEL ME AND ASSOCIATE THANgS TO CERTAIN MUTHA-FUKAS? THAT AIN'T COO'.
You label YOURSELF when you ENDORSE what they teach and DON'T say anything about it. When people tell me or ask me if I am a christian I tell them I am NOT a christian and I explain WHY this is so. When people ask YOU about your beliefs you promote J.W. teachings, but when you are asked if you are a J.W. you
NEVER give an explanation as to why you DON'T adhere to their beliefs.
TELL IT LIKE IT IS, DON'T ASSOCIATE ME WITH N-E-BODY CAUSE EDJ RIDES SOLO. AND JUST LIKE MUTHA-FUKAS THAT QUIK TO CALL A BIBLE A BOOK INSTEAD OF A COLLECTION OF BOOKS, YOU DOIN' THE SAME THANg BY SAYIN' THAT J.W BELIEVE IN A DOCTRINE INSTEAD OF A SET OF DOCTRINES. gET IT RIgHT
LMAO! This is NOT the same thing and you are grasping for straws, but do I honestly have to explain WHY they are different? But, you are correct. The J.W. DO believe in several doctrines/dogmas and MOST if not ALL of them have been refuted and proven to be biblically incorrect. But, back to the bible thing.
NINEWUNSIXX5150 QUESTION IS LEgIT. HE SEE'S A FLAW IN THE DOCTRINE ABOUT THE SOUL SURVIVIN' DEATH AND WANTS TO SEE WHOEVA BELIEVES IN THIS DOgMA TO DEFEND THEY POSITION. SEE, HE CAN'T PULL MY CARD, CAUSE I SEE WHAT HE STRESSIN'.
This statement doesn't deserve an in depth response from me, but you just proved my point. Good job. :classic:
BTW, for those who wish to educate themselves and not dance around questions when they are posed to them hit this link:
http://www.biblecentre.org/topics/ajp_hades_and_et_punishment.htm
It is VERY informative and you can look the words up yourself.