STOCTON,
YOU A JOKE AND A HIPOCRITE. NOWHERE HAVE I STATED THAT I AM CHRISTIAN OR TRYIN' TO BE. I SAID MY BELIEFS ARE ROOTED IN SCRIPTURE(NOT YOUR INTERPRETATION, OBVIOUSLY), BUT I'M STILL THAT gANgSTA ASS MUTHA-FUKA FROM THE 5-1 BLOK. IF THE WORLD WAS TO END TODAY, I'D BE AgAINST (gOD) CAUSE I'M WILLFULLY SINNIN' AND PART OF THIS WORLD WITH WORLDY DESIRES.
YOU ON THE OTHA HAND, TRYIN' TO PREACH TO MUTHA-FUKAS BUT QUIK TO CALL A SURENO A "SCRAP". CAN YOU SAY THE WORD SURENO? WOULD YOU EVA HAVE A BIBLE STUDY WITH A SURENO AND LOVE HIM LIKE A BROTHA? MISS ME WITH YOUR TYPE-BEFORE-YOU-THINK ASS. CAUSE I WILL BEAT YOUR "NORTONTO" ASS WITH YOUR OWN BIBLE PUNK.
AND ADDRESS THE ISSUES IN THE THREADS HERESY LEFT IF YOU WANNA ADDRESS THEM. I'M NOT gONNA WASTE MY TIME AND SOUND LIKE A BROKEN RECORD.
HERESY,
I TOLD YOU I DON'T WANNA gET INTO THIS.
BUT YOU STRESSED, "EDJ your claim that Queber was never mentioned is incorrect. I'll chop it up to memory loss. I don't NEED to address 916, because HE needs to address himself and pick up a book just like you. Here is proof that I have mentioned Queber, and this is the stuff that I typed BEFORE the site crashed."
WHEN DID THE SITE CRASHED? I SAID YOU THE ONE THAT MENTIONED QEBER OR QUEBER. I SAID YOU BROUgHT IT UP. AND WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THE COMMON gRAVE FOR ALL MANKIND, NOT THAT HELL=QEBER.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "As far as Lazarus you have failed to debunk what I posted about it (before the site went down), but the links I just gave basically tell the same thing."
BULLSHIT. WE WENT THOROUgHLY ON THAT SUBJECT AND YOU NEVA ANSWERED:
#1. HOW CAN A LOVIN' gOD TORTURE HIS OWN CHILDREN?
#X. IF HELL IS AN ACTUAL PLACE OF TORMENT AND ALL SINNERS BURN FOREVA, THAT VIOLATES THE EYE FOR AN EYE RULE. WHY WOULD I BURN FOREVA FOR A MEASELY 80 YEARS(MORE OR LESS, AND THAT'S TAKIN' INTO ACCOUNT THAT EVERY DAY I WAS DOIN' THE MOST DIRT) OF SIN? THE SHIT DON'T ADD UP.
#3. 2-0-SIXX CAN FIND THAT POST WHERE WE WENT THUROUgHLY ABOUT THE LAZARUS INCIDENT. CAUSE I EVEN LEFT A BIBLIOgRAPHY WHERE I gOT MY INFO. AND THE SITE DIDN'T gO DOWN THEN. YOU MY FRIEND IS LOSIN' YOUR MEMORY. BUT LIKE I TOLD YOU, LET'S NOT gET INTO THIS. ALL WE DOIN' IS BEATIN' A DEAD HORSE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "You have NEVER went against ANYTHING presented by the JEHOVAH WITNESSES."
BULLSHIT. I QUESTION EVERYTHANg. EVERY INFO PRESENTED I LOOKED UP TO SEE IF IT WAS TRUE OR NOT. I AIN'T TAKIN' MUTHA-FUKAS WORD FOR IT. AND WHEN I LOOKED IT UP, MY CONCLUSION IS THAT THEY WAS SPEAKIN' THE TRUTH.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "Yet, you have NEVER gone against it."
LOOK ABOVE. AT THE END, IN MY OPINION, THEY SPOKE THE TRUTH.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "I HAVE gone against what can be considered "christian" doctrine and have openly stated that I am NOT a "christian" but a FOLLOWER OF THE WAY."
IT AIN'T CHRISTIAN AND THAT'S WHY YOU REBUKE IT. I FEEL IN YOUR HEART, YOU LOOKIN' FOR TRUTH AND HAVE SEEN THE FALSE WAYS OF THESE SELF PROFESSED "CHRISTIANS". BTW, WHAT IS THE FOLLOWER OF THE WAY?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "You on teh other hand have CONSTANTLY endorsed EVERYTHING associated with the J.W.'s (including their mistranslated bible) and have NEVER been at odds with their doctrine."
THE KEY WORD IS "ASSOCIATED". SO YOU TELLIN' ME THAT YOU ARE LIKE THESE LAWS AND SQUARES AND WANT TO LABEL ME AND ASSOCIATE THANgS TO CERTAIN MUTHA-FUKAS? THAT AIN'T COO'. TELL IT LIKE IT IS, DON'T ASSOCIATE ME WITH N-E-BODY CAUSE EDJ RIDES SOLO. AND JUST LIKE MUTHA-FUKAS THAT QUIK TO CALL A BIBLE A BOOK INSTEAD OF A COLLECTION OF BOOKS, YOU DOIN' THE SAME THANg BY SAYIN' THAT J.W BELIEVE IN A DOCTRINE INSTEAD OF A SET OF DOCTRINES. gET IT RIgHT.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "As far as 916 having a legit question thats up for debate. 916 does NOT adhere to the scriptures that you or I profess to believe in. He adheres to the HINDU scriptures, and if I were to make a thread similar to his he would have probably done the same thing. Again, people need to READ before they start making posts that appear contradictory. Look at the FIRST reply to 916's post and you'll see why I say people need to read and why his question was sideways."
NINEWUNSIXX5150 QUESTION IS LEgIT. HE SEE'S A FLAW IN THE DOCTRINE ABOUT THE SOUL SURVIVIN' DEATH AND WANTS TO SEE WHOEVA BELIEVES IN THIS DOgMA TO DEFEND THEY POSITION. SEE, HE CAN'T PULL MY CARD, CAUSE I SEE WHAT HE STRESSIN'.