The shit is about to hit the fan!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
52
#1
hxxp://wikileaks.org/
EDITORIAL:U.S. must stop spying on WikiLeaks

Fri Mar 26 08:44:46 UTC 2010
Over the last few years, WikiLeaks has been the subject of hostile acts by security organizations. In the developing world, these range from the appalling assassination of two related human rights lawyers in Nairobi last March (an armed attack on my compound there in 2007 is still unattributed) to an unsuccessful mass attack by Chinese computers on our servers in Stockholm, after we published photos of murders in Tibet. In the West this has ranged from the overt, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service, the BND, threatening to prosecute us unless we removed a report on CIA activity in Kosovo, to the covert, to an ambush by a "James Bond" character in a Luxembourg car park, an event that ended with a mere "we think it would be in your interest to...".
Developing world violence aside, we've become used to the level of security service interest in us and have established procedures to ignore that interest.
But the increase in surveillance activities this last month, in a time when we are barely publishing due to fundraising, are excessive. Some of the new interest is related to a film exposing a U.S. massacre we will release at the U.S. National Press Club on April 5.
The spying includes attempted covert following, photographing, filming and the overt detention & questioning of a WikiLeaks' volunteer in Iceland on Monday night.
Army: Wikileaks A National Security Threat


An Army counterintelligence document claims the site is a security threat because it posts classified government materials.
By Elizabeth Montalbano
InformationWeek
March 16, 2010 12:33 PM
Wikileaks.org is considered a threat to national security because it posts classified intelligence information, according to a 2008 U.S. Army document Wikileaks posted Monday.
http://twitter.com/wikiLeaks
If anything happens to us, you know why: it is our Apr 5 film. And you know who is responsible. 8:33 PM Mar 23rd via bit.ly
Judging from their tweets, Wikileaks believes the surveillance is related to an upcoming presentation where they will show unencrypted footage of a May 7 U.S. airstrike in Afghanistan which killed 97 civilians:


The Pentagon had originally planned to show the video as proof that it had conducted the operation appropriately, despite having used airbursting bombs with civilians in the area. They later back-pedaled, likely because video was actually more incriminating than they first believed.
Afghan Airstrike Video Goes Down the Memory Hole




Last month, U.S. Central Command chief Gen. David Petraeus and other American military officials strongly suggested that they were ready to show the public a classified video which they said would largely vindicate a series of deadly American air strikes in western Afghanistan. Now, a CENTCOM report on the incident has been released. But the video is nowhere to be seen. And the report fails to address why massively destructive one-ton bombs and airbursting munitions were used during the fight, when civilians were in the vicinity.
Secretary of State Clinton, President Obama, and other American leaders apologized after American F/A-18 jets and a B-1 bomber dropped munitions on suspected Taliban positions during a firefight in the village of Garani. As many as 97 civilians may have lost their lives, according to the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission. But the U.S. military remained steadfast that the attacks on a set of Garani compounds were justified — and said that footage taken from the B-1’s weapon sight would “prove [t]hat the targets of these different strikes were the Taliban,” as Petraeus told NPR. The video allegedly shows that two groups of fully-grown adults going inside the compounds targeted by the B-1. Additional footage shows women and children streaming into other buildings that were not bombed.
“Are you going to release the video itself?” NPR’s Steve Inskeep asked the general.
Petraeus answered, “We won’t give it to you, but I believe that we will show it as part of the press briefing.”


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/200...ideo-goes-down-the-memory-hole/#ixzz0jJWqCZ9q
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#10
Every time you hear a body count given by the U.S. during the war saying something like “X amount of Taliban killed” remember this quote as I do from a dialog between a soldier and his superior in the Vietnam War. “12 NVA killed, sir. How did you know they were NVA? They're dead, sir.”*



Puts things in context quite well.





* source of the quote: They Marched Into Sunlight: War and Peace Vietnam and America October 1967
 
Mar 12, 2010
2,722
9
0
45
#11
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
52
#12
you might get killed by the CIA for this..
Nah, it's already at MAJOR NEWS outlets. Question is why havent they talked about this on the news. Seeing that the Associated Press, Scripps, along with the A.C.L.U are financial supporters for wiki leaks. Seems like they lettin em call the show and leak it when they ready. April 5.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#15
For us lazy fucks that dont wanna read all that...can we have a breakdown of what it says?

Gov don't like wikileaks cuz dey be runnin dey mouff too muchz. And dey be doin spy vs spy on em and shiitz.

Wilileaks sez yo if we get smoked you beezies know who dun it.

Wilileaks den sez we gots dem muah fuckaz on tape n shits and we droppin that shit on April Feeze like dey be droppin bombz on dem Afghanz



P.S.

pussu

tiddies
 
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
52
#19
For us lazy fucks that dont wanna read all that...can we have a breakdown of what it says?
Judging from their tweets, Wikileaks believes the surveillance is related to an upcoming presentation where they will show unencrypted footage of a May 7 U.S. airstrike in Afghanistan which killed 97 civilians:

Wiki Leak is not supposed to have that! Gov says it didn't happen! They are going to leak the video on April 5th.