Niner/Raider fans opinion on sharing a stadium?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 12, 2004
7,488
886
0
38
#1
I'm hearing more and more as the time goes by that the stadium built in Santa Clara will be home to both the Niners and Raiders. Amy Task and Jed York supposedly have a great relationship and have working together behind the scenes on this. Was wondering how you guys felt about that? I personally don't care, BUT I think it's cool that every team has their own stadium that is rich with their history, ties in with their image, etc. Also, knowing that this isn't your teams stadium but a shared stadium kind of takes away from the whole "this is our house" environment. But a brand spanking new stadium with more than 1 exit and cupholders does sound nice.
 

corinthian

Just Win Baby!!!
Feb 23, 2006
5,704
1,257
113
41
3rd ID
#2
from the raiders side. it seems like the organization wouldn't mind sharing a stadium, but they want to have it built at the current site. just knockdown the old one and build a brand new stadium.
 

Cut-Throat

Bob Pimp MOBBEN!!!
Apr 25, 2002
7,033
29,861
0
43
#3
the A's will have to resolve there stadium issues and/or move before the the raiders can begin to think about knockin the coliseum down and building a new one..
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,366
6,556
113
42
#6
Na that shits stupid. Theres already a big enough beef between Raiders/Niners fans. Plus its makes no sense for the Raiders to play in Santa Clara
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#7
I don't care about sharing a stadium, I'd just rather not have to go to Santa Clara. with that being said, if it prevents us from moving to LA, I'm all for it.
 
Feb 12, 2004
7,488
886
0
38
#9
Al Davis wanted the new Raider stadium in Oakland, but Amy Task wants to share one with the 49ers.



Time for Oakland Raiders to push for shared stadium
By: Glenn Dickey | 10/14/11 3:00 AM
Columnist
Shared football stadium
The Oakland Raiders must get serious about pursuing a shared stadium with the San Francisco 49ers in Santa Clara. (AP file photo)

One of the big changes for the Raiders with Al Davis gone: They can now pursue a shared-stadium option with the 49ers in Santa Clara.

Amy Trask has been talking to the 49ers about that option for some time, but as long as Davis was alive, it wasn’t going to happen. Al Davis never wanted to share. He had a sweetheart deal going in Los Angeles for a new stadium, near the Hollywood Park race track, but wouldn’t agree because there was a provision that, if Los Angeles got an expansion team, he would have to share the stadium. There were no plans for that to happen in the immediate future and it hasn’t happened, but just the possibility was enough to make Davis decide to move the team back to Oakland.

Davis wanted a new stadium, but he wanted it in Oakland, in the same area as the current Coliseum. That wasn’t ever going to happen. Oakland doesn’t have the money. No city or county official would dare propose using public money to build a new football stadium. But if the Raiders leave, the Coliseum could be modified as a baseball-only park for the A’s.

Trask is a tough negotiator, but realistic. She knows the Santa Clara option is a good one and I’m sure she’ll pursue it energetically.

There are many good reasons for a joint stadium in Santa Clara, starting with the fact that NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has been pushing the idea of shared stadiums, especially in California, where it has long been
difficult-to-impossible to get substantial public money for a sports facility. The Giants decided that in the early ’90s and made plans to build their own baseball park — and baseball parks are relatively cheap compared to football stadiums.

There is even an excellent precedent for this: The New York Giants and New York Jets play in a shared stadium across the river from New York City in New Jersey. Not coincidentally, they haven’t dropped the New York name.

The 49ers could still call themselves the San Francisco 49ers (Santa Clara has agreed to that) and the Raiders could still be the Oakland Raiders.

Neither team would have to play in the other’s home city, but Santa Clara is, in effect, a neutral site.

The site is close to the majority of the fan base for both teams, located south of their current parks in each case. It would be easily accessible by car, Caltrain and — for 49ers fans from the north — by the Capitol Express train from Sacramento.

The change there won’t be as drastic as it might seem. Davis had put together a good scouting department that, though its members are anonymous, has been largely responsible for the good draft picks in rounds 3-7 the past few years. It won’t be that difficult to find a good football man to head up the operation.

The combined stadium is the crucial part of the equation because it would boost revenues and franchise value for both teams. It’s time to get serious about this.

Read more at the San Francisco Examiner: http://www.sfexaminer.com/sports/nfl/2011/10/time-oakland-raiders-push-shared-stadium#ixzz1dRVWXC8j
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#12
Sharing a stadium would be pretty cool IMO because if you are gonna spend $500 million dollars on something you might as well use it as much as possible.

Plus as a fan of football, it would be nice to have the opportunity to go to more games, regardless of who is playing.

That stadium would have a game almost every Sunday for the whole season.
 

V

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
5,308
137
0
39
#15
  • V

    V

im all for it...its makes sense economically and geographically...like mr. nice guy said, you're gonna spend close to a billion dollars on something....use it as much as possible.

times are tough, both teams play in shitty stadiums and its gonna be extremely tough for either team to build a stadium by themselves...makes perfect sense to share.