I been gone for a minute but here I go. Whiner fans shouldnt even vote cause they are the biased fans I know. I have said before Aikman is better than Young. Young has had better talent for recievers and thats a fact! Aikman is way better in the clutch and his track record proves that. Montana was definitely better than Aikman but not Young sorry! And whoever said Young is the greatest running QB of alltime is smokin crack!! Got Em!!!
You're a little off on this one...Young did have a great offense, but Aikman had the BETTER overall offense. He had a better O-Line and running back. The tight ends and receivers were both pretty equal. Aikman didn't have to really make anything happen, it was either hand off to Emmit, throw it up long to Harper or Irving, or dump it over the middle to Novacek. If a pass play was defended, he was sacked or threw an int(as the stats prove). Young made shit happen, bottom line.
And by the way, I'm a Cowboys fan and if given the choice, I would take Young over Aikman. I'm not complaining though cause I got to watch those championship seasons.