WHAT UP WIT SICX ??
- Thread starter sureyarite
- Start date
Man the SPM. Thing was diffeerent they said that chick was 15 and she was workin at a strip club when he fucked her so if figured she was over the age bitches r stupid like that get a mutha fucka caught up over dumb shit but as far as sicx I hope he fuckin rotts but I still bump his music which is real sick
Naw naw homie, read up on it, the girl was like 7 or 9..I put that..its all over the internet.just look it up..supposley the parents of the gurl was friends with SPM....n the case they brought up a gurl SPM impregnated when he was 21 n she was 12...thats basically y they said he did it..then when this allegation came up, they grilled him on that fact...
shall grant the requested relief.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendants were charged with numerous sex offenses arising
from their molestation of two children. Defendants committed
the crimes by, among other things, forcing the victims to pick a
card from a deck of sexually explicit drawings and then perform
the act as depicted in the drawing.
Kunitz was charged with 15 counts and Lopez with 13 counts
of forcibly committing a lewd or lascivious act upon a child.
(§ 288(b)(1).) The defendants were also charged with two counts
each of oral copulation with a child under the age of 14 by a
defendant who is 10 years older (§ 288a, subd. (c)(1)); four
counts each of aggravated sexual assault of a child (§ 269,
subd. (a)(4), (5)); and two counts each of sexual penetration of
a child under the age of 14 by a defendant who is at least
10 years older (§ 289, subd. (j)). Kunitz was additionally
charged with one count of aggravated sexual assault by means of
rape (§ 269, subd. (a)(1)), while Lopez was charged with five
1 Further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.
-3-
separate counts of committing a lewd or lascivious act upon a
child (§ 288, subd. (a)(1)).
Pursuant to a plea bargain, both defendants pleaded guilty
to four counts of forcibly committing a lewd or lascivious act
upon a child. (§ 288(b)(1).) At sentencing, the trial court
imposed a restitution fine of $6,400 and a parole revocation
fine in the same amount, to be payable jointly and severally by
both defendants. Each defendant was sentenced to 32 years in
prison.
DISCUSSION
Defendants contend that imposition of joint and several
restitution fines is unauthorized. This contention has merit.
Neither section 1202.4, subdivision (b) (section 1202.4(b))
nor section 1202.45 expressly provides for imposition of a
restitution fine payable jointly and severally among two or
more defendants, and we decline to infer such an intent from
the statutory language.
Section 1202.4(b) requires the court to impose a
restitution fine “n every case where a person is convicted of
a crime,” in the absence of compelling or extraordinary reasons
for not imposing the fine. (Italics added.) Subdivision (1) of
section 1202.4(b) provides that “[t]he restitution fine shall be
set at the discretion of the court and commensurate with the
seriousness of the offense, but shall not be less than two
hundred dollars ($200), and not more than ten thousand dollars
($10,000), if the person is convicted of a felony . . . .”
(Italics added.) Subdivision (2) of section 1202.4(b) provides
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendants were charged with numerous sex offenses arising
from their molestation of two children. Defendants committed
the crimes by, among other things, forcing the victims to pick a
card from a deck of sexually explicit drawings and then perform
the act as depicted in the drawing.
Kunitz was charged with 15 counts and Lopez with 13 counts
of forcibly committing a lewd or lascivious act upon a child.
(§ 288(b)(1).) The defendants were also charged with two counts
each of oral copulation with a child under the age of 14 by a
defendant who is 10 years older (§ 288a, subd. (c)(1)); four
counts each of aggravated sexual assault of a child (§ 269,
subd. (a)(4), (5)); and two counts each of sexual penetration of
a child under the age of 14 by a defendant who is at least
10 years older (§ 289, subd. (j)). Kunitz was additionally
charged with one count of aggravated sexual assault by means of
rape (§ 269, subd. (a)(1)), while Lopez was charged with five
1 Further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.
-3-
separate counts of committing a lewd or lascivious act upon a
child (§ 288, subd. (a)(1)).
Pursuant to a plea bargain, both defendants pleaded guilty
to four counts of forcibly committing a lewd or lascivious act
upon a child. (§ 288(b)(1).) At sentencing, the trial court
imposed a restitution fine of $6,400 and a parole revocation
fine in the same amount, to be payable jointly and severally by
both defendants. Each defendant was sentenced to 32 years in
prison.
DISCUSSION
Defendants contend that imposition of joint and several
restitution fines is unauthorized. This contention has merit.
Neither section 1202.4, subdivision (b) (section 1202.4(b))
nor section 1202.45 expressly provides for imposition of a
restitution fine payable jointly and severally among two or
more defendants, and we decline to infer such an intent from
the statutory language.
Section 1202.4(b) requires the court to impose a
restitution fine “n every case where a person is convicted of
a crime,” in the absence of compelling or extraordinary reasons
for not imposing the fine. (Italics added.) Subdivision (1) of
section 1202.4(b) provides that “[t]he restitution fine shall be
set at the discretion of the court and commensurate with the
seriousness of the offense, but shall not be less than two
hundred dollars ($200), and not more than ten thousand dollars
($10,000), if the person is convicted of a felony . . . .”
(Italics added.) Subdivision (2) of section 1202.4(b) provides
ITWCT & Nigga Deep are the shit.....
i dont give a fuck what any muthafucka on the siccness has to say about Sicx... none of you squares would ever change my mind about anything.... i rarely bump Sicx's music anymore but im always gonna love the albums he dropped no matter what dumbass has to say about his lyrics...i dont go on the siccness to make friends like alot of other lonely faggots do on here LOL
i dont give a fuck what any muthafucka on the siccness has to say about Sicx... none of you squares would ever change my mind about anything.... i rarely bump Sicx's music anymore but im always gonna love the albums he dropped no matter what dumbass has to say about his lyrics...i dont go on the siccness to make friends like alot of other lonely faggots do on here LOL
LOL like i said above, i rarely bump Sicx's music anymore..... but all this shit talk on here isnt gonna change my mind about anything. i dont approve of what sicx did sure let the man rot in prison...
but i will always love ITWCT and Nigga Deep no matter what anyone says on here..... if that offends you then GOOD... go cry to your bitch.
but i will always love ITWCT and Nigga Deep no matter what anyone says on here..... if that offends you then GOOD... go cry to your bitch.
Shock value? Says who? The man lived what he rapped about. It wasn't done for shock value... People supported his music then turned on him... That is indeed hypocrisy.
On a side note... People found it entertaining that he rapped about molesting kids? Fucking sick! Some of y'all need some fucking help.
On a side note... People found it entertaining that he rapped about molesting kids? Fucking sick! Some of y'all need some fucking help.