What could the U.S. do about Russia?

[2-0-Sixx]

Georgia’s military is still intact and still fighting.



Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine no longer have direct land borders with Russia?




No, it doesn’t.



No, the U.S. is in no position to take any kind of military action against Russia. The most that could be expected would be for them to rally other allies and try some kind of economic punishment, which could easily backfire on the rest of Europe if they try.




I personally think you are fucking stupid.




Not even close.




I think you need to stop watching CNN and Fox News because you are totally out of touch with reality.

:hurt::knockout::dead:

 

[2-0-Sixx]

You seem to have a lot of messages about other people's opinions, boy. What is your opinion of this situation? Enlighten the stupid fucks with your omnipotent vision and unlimited knowledge....Some people can appreciate and use new knowledge, while others just like to be armchair "told yo so's"...Sprinkle us with your take, or you just can just keep "telling us so".

The Gathering of minds forum can be useful:

http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=289308

 

[REDRUM559]

we might go into war fuck.... just now i heard on cnn.....that i guess US is sending cargo planes wit health supplies and shit and US tells russia to back off the borders and all this was BUSH's COMMAND.

fuck we all gonna die... =\

 

[2-0-Sixx]

^^The US is NOT going to war with Russia.

 

[Fucky McFuckerson]

^^The US is NOT going to war with Russia.

IF they did, would the US lose?

 

[NorthBay 415]

But if we did say hello 2 a draft

 

[mocheezkc]

IF they did, would the US lose?

There will be no winners if the U.S. and Russia went to war. Everybody will lose, with all of the poor people of the world suffering the most.

 

[2-0-Sixx]

IF they did, would the US lose?

depends on what you mean by lose and what exactly the goals of the US would be.

 

[Ethereal]

2,000 soldiers

...

 

[Fucky McFuckerson]

depends on what you mean by lose and what exactly the goals of the US would be.

Think of the Vietnam war.

 

[Ethereal]

It also depends on what other countries are involved. Is it Russia and it's allies or are we talking about one country vs. the other.

 

[NorthBay 415]

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/13/us.russia.diplomacy/index.html?iref=newssearch


^Bush orders U.S. military to help Georgian civilians^^

 

[ColdBlooded]

IF they did, would the US lose?

Is there such thing as a winner in global thermo-nuclear war?

 

[ColdBlooded]

we might go into war fuck.... just now i heard on cnn.....that i guess US is sending cargo planes wit health supplies and shit and US tells russia to back off the borders and all this was BUSH's COMMAND.

fuck we all gonna die... =\

Sending "humanitarian aid" to an embattled ally does not mean the U.S. is going to war with Russia.

 

[Ethereal]

Is there such thing as a winner in global thermo-nuclear war?

The country who drops them first?

 

[HiLsyde707Kloun]

Bomb it and call them terrorist/communists to get civilian support and tell every1 that they are threatening our Freedom. Seems to work. People buy into that bullshit.

 

[ColdBlooded]

The country who drops them first?

A first strike (by either country) is not capable of preventing a retaliatory second strike by the opposing country.

Nuclear war between the United States and Russia = mutually assured destruction.

This has consistently been the reasoning behind "missile defense" and the reason the United States is pressing continually for eastern European countries to be brought into the fold and station "defensive" missiles in their country - it has nothing to do with Iran. Missile defense is used to cut down on the possible number of successful missiles impacting the U.S. in a retaliatory second strike. Thus "missile defense" is truly missile OFFENSE.

 

[Ethereal]

Right.. fact of the matter is neither country will use them on one another so there is no point in taking that question serious.

 

[GrafsiccDesigns]

depends on what you mean by lose and what exactly the goals of the US would be.

exactly.....

the powers that seek to globalize the planet have to get rid of a lot of people due to overpopulation....a world war especially with russia would guarantee many deaths and speed up the eugenics that these same folks already practice anyways....its been happening forever but its just more extreme cuz theres so many more people in the world now than the last world war....

 

[ColdBlooded]

Right.. fact of the matter is neither country will use them on one another so there is no point in taking that question serious.

Which is why neither country will go to war with the other. There is a reason the U.S. and Russia have been fighting wars via proxy for the last 60 years.