HERESY said:
Women usually say I'm long lasting and attractive.
Yes, smarter than you, or did you not comprehend what I previously said?
No actually I am. Anytime I get a person to back peddle and second guess themselves they have already taken the plunge.
See above.
You've used that word twice now. Please step your vocab game up and use different verbs and adjectives.
Unfounded claims. Here it is cmoke introduced rappers and asked, "Shouldnt these people ge dropped from their labels and canned", yet YOU don't see the importance of asking who the label owners are and who benefits from the type of music in question? In your infinite wisdom you fail to see that dropping them is a no no.
This is a fine moment for ignorance.
How did the firing of Imus contribute to Al Sharptons rent? I posted a link to a video clip where Imus made comments about so-called jews in an unsavory fashion. Maybe THAT contributed to his ordeal and the latest episode was the straw that broke the camels back. Given the history of what happens to those in america who say things about "jews" THAT would appear more logical than Sharpton paying his rent. :dead:
No, it is all relevant because it is all derived from CMOKES initial statement. Listen, YOU do NOT understand critical reading, critical thinking, DEDUCTIVE or INDUCTIVE reasoning. Because you don't understand these simple concepts, you constantly run into a brick wall when you ponder why the questions were asked.
Imus has had a HISTORY of using slurs and epithets on his show, so you're going to tell me he was fired just because he said nappy headed hoes? LMAO! Only a FOOL would believe that. Imus was fired because at that point he was a LIABILITY and sponsers were starting to yank ADVERTISEMENT. He made the company LOOSE money you dummy. Those stations didn't fire him because of Al Sharpton or because they wanted to be humanitarians. He was fired because the SPONSERS didn't like the bad attention and didn't want to be associated with him OR his remarks.
Where is the double standard? And no, Simmons was on the opposite side of the field when it happened, and that right there shows you that HE doesn't have a double standard because he CHANGED his perspective and said it SHOULD be banned. :dead:
See above son.
Awe, pooooooooor baby. His da da got the boot now he has to stay in the house with him (alone by the way.) You went from limp to flaccid, can't you use any other terms? How am I hiding behind the same tired civil rights rhetoric when on the first page of this thread I said, "Do I believe Imus should have been fired? Hell no. Do I believe he should have said what he said? Well, why would you say that shit knowing Kramer just took a beating for saying what he said?"
Once again, you're a dummy.
Again, where do you fools come up with the idea that rappers are free from scrutiny? If rappers were free from scrutiny we wouldn't have this convo. If they were free from it Al Sharpton, THE SAME AL SHARPTON YOU CLAIM GOT IMUS FIRED, would NOT have called for 50 Cent records to be be PULLED from shelves. YOU are the one with the double standrad here my puppet.
Also, if rappers are free from scrutiny, what the fuck was C. Delores Tucker doing? So to drive another nail in your coffin, rappers are not free from scrutiny, rappers are free from ACCOUNTABILITY. These are two distinct concepts, and you'll most likely never comprehend the difference.
Scrutiny: a searching examination or investigation; minute inquiry.
Accountability: the state of being accountable, liable, or answerable.
Again, do you see the label owners stopping it?
No, there is no accountability, and as soon as accountability is enforced, the companies will loose revenue. Do you not see how the business aspect works?
Stupidity at its finest.
Go back ad read everything again.
Yes, smarter than you, or did you not comprehend what I previously said?
No actually I am. Anytime I get a person to back peddle and second guess themselves they have already taken the plunge.
See above.
You've used that word twice now. Please step your vocab game up and use different verbs and adjectives.
Unfounded claims. Here it is cmoke introduced rappers and asked, "Shouldnt these people ge dropped from their labels and canned", yet YOU don't see the importance of asking who the label owners are and who benefits from the type of music in question? In your infinite wisdom you fail to see that dropping them is a no no.
This is a fine moment for ignorance.
How did the firing of Imus contribute to Al Sharptons rent? I posted a link to a video clip where Imus made comments about so-called jews in an unsavory fashion. Maybe THAT contributed to his ordeal and the latest episode was the straw that broke the camels back. Given the history of what happens to those in america who say things about "jews" THAT would appear more logical than Sharpton paying his rent. :dead:
No, it is all relevant because it is all derived from CMOKES initial statement. Listen, YOU do NOT understand critical reading, critical thinking, DEDUCTIVE or INDUCTIVE reasoning. Because you don't understand these simple concepts, you constantly run into a brick wall when you ponder why the questions were asked.
Imus has had a HISTORY of using slurs and epithets on his show, so you're going to tell me he was fired just because he said nappy headed hoes? LMAO! Only a FOOL would believe that. Imus was fired because at that point he was a LIABILITY and sponsers were starting to yank ADVERTISEMENT. He made the company LOOSE money you dummy. Those stations didn't fire him because of Al Sharpton or because they wanted to be humanitarians. He was fired because the SPONSERS didn't like the bad attention and didn't want to be associated with him OR his remarks.
Where is the double standard? And no, Simmons was on the opposite side of the field when it happened, and that right there shows you that HE doesn't have a double standard because he CHANGED his perspective and said it SHOULD be banned. :dead:
See above son.
Awe, pooooooooor baby. His da da got the boot now he has to stay in the house with him (alone by the way.) You went from limp to flaccid, can't you use any other terms? How am I hiding behind the same tired civil rights rhetoric when on the first page of this thread I said, "Do I believe Imus should have been fired? Hell no. Do I believe he should have said what he said? Well, why would you say that shit knowing Kramer just took a beating for saying what he said?"
Once again, you're a dummy.
Again, where do you fools come up with the idea that rappers are free from scrutiny? If rappers were free from scrutiny we wouldn't have this convo. If they were free from it Al Sharpton, THE SAME AL SHARPTON YOU CLAIM GOT IMUS FIRED, would NOT have called for 50 Cent records to be be PULLED from shelves. YOU are the one with the double standrad here my puppet.
Also, if rappers are free from scrutiny, what the fuck was C. Delores Tucker doing? So to drive another nail in your coffin, rappers are not free from scrutiny, rappers are free from ACCOUNTABILITY. These are two distinct concepts, and you'll most likely never comprehend the difference.
Scrutiny: a searching examination or investigation; minute inquiry.
Accountability: the state of being accountable, liable, or answerable.
Again, do you see the label owners stopping it?
No, there is no accountability, and as soon as accountability is enforced, the companies will loose revenue. Do you not see how the business aspect works?
Stupidity at its finest.
Go back ad read everything again.