Trump's immigration ban sends shockwaves

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 21, 2016
892
5,398
0
Yes, that is him. I have no idea how you can be a nazi, and like rap. Makes literally no sense.

Of course, this is the same mark ass bitch that went captain save-a-hoe on some hood rat in Detroit, and got kicked to the curb. Or all the way back to Australia to be exact. Trynna call people "cucks". Bitch, you the very definition of a cuck, dumbass.
oh look its your gay captain save a 2 0 sixx partner in crime to the rescue, helping you invoke godwins law because both you fags have no argument.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
again. nothing shows there is no bias. thanks for the info but this isn't what i asked for. FOX News isn't bias? c'mon, your ideology says they aren't biased?
(i use FOX News as a example since everybody understands Fox News is bias.
Amazing. This is the second time in this thread alone you asked a question and I replied with answers to your specific questions, only for you to change the topic or completely forget what it was you were talking about. You said and I quote, "what company owns them? and which news outlets are owned by who?" Once again you've wasted my time.

On top of that, what the fuck are you even talking about man? No bias? Where in earth do you get the impression that I am claiming there is no bias in the media? Re-read my post. Then read it again. I specifically said there is Corporate bias and Power bias. And then you go on to say "dont tell me shit. you can read numbers or you can pay attention to physical life" which is just another example of pure ignorance. You ask questions, I answer providing factual information and your response is to not tell you shit, numbers/data means nothing. I would ask how you're able to learn things in life but clearly learning isn't something you're interested in. Just set in your ways, you know all the answers even of you don't know the answers! Literally choosing ignorance as a way of life.



so read a book with an obvious political tilt, that you, with your political tilt, recommends, cus it fits in with your ideology? i read the summary and that's all i need to read to know where he stands and how he spews what he learns. then i onced over his wiki and it all made sense.
One does not simply read a summary of Noam Chomsky. Either you read it or you don't, either you're familiar with him or you're not. Clearly you choose not to and I don't care. I never expected you to read it, just pointing out that books have been written on the very topic of the myth of the liberal media, studies have been conducted, thousands of man hours have been put into this which far outweighs your anecdotal evidence and "real life" experience that the media is heavily liberal. What I can show you is actual hard evidence and facts that prove otherwise but you've already made it clear you are not hearing any of that; your mind is made, facts be damned!

There is only so much patience I have when it comes to intentional ignorance. I don't care if people disagree with me; discussion is always welcome, conversations are often than best when multiple viewpoints are on the table. But when people behave like you are, wasting others time and refusing to engage in a productive conversation, then fuck it, stop talking if you are going to be that narrow minded. What point is there other than being a cunt?

Speaking of cunts, there are plenty of trolls as it is on this forum like ReSpawn, the Australian neo nazi who was rejected by American women which filled his miserable pathetic heart full of hate and sadness to the point where the only enjoyment he receives out of life is logging onto the siccness and "trolling" with Nazi names and words and talking about teh Jews. You realize how sad it is for a fascist to post on the siccness? Don't troll, don't end up like ReSpawn, it's not a life for anyone to live.
 
Jun 21, 2016
892
5,398
0
Speaking of cunts, there are plenty of trolls as it is on this forum like ReSpawn, the Australian neo nazi who was rejected by American women which filled his miserable pathetic heart full of hate and sadness to the point where the only enjoyment he receives out of life is logging onto the siccness and "trolling" with Nazi names and words and talking about teh Jews. You realize how sad it is for a fascist to post on the siccness? Don't troll, don't end up like ReSpawn, it's not a life for anyone to live.
lmao

using a bitch for a visa is hardly being 'rejected by american women'

you have no argument, keep using ad hominem and godwins to help sway the crowd

 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
Amazing. This is the second time in this thread alone you asked a question and I replied with answers to your specific questions, only for you to change the topic or completely forget what it was you were talking about. You said and I quote, "what company owns them? and which news outlets are owned by who?" Once again you've wasted my time.

On top of that, what the fuck are you even talking about man? No bias? Where in earth do you get the impression that I am claiming there is no bias in the media? Re-read my post. Then read it again. I specifically said there is Corporate bias and Power bias. And then you go on to say "dont tell me shit. you can read numbers or you can pay attention to physical life" which is just another example of pure ignorance. You ask questions, I answer providing factual information and your response is to not tell you shit, numbers/data means nothing. I would ask how you're able to learn things in life but clearly learning isn't something you're interested in. Just set in your ways, you know all the answers even of you don't know the answers! Literally choosing ignorance as a way of life.





One does not simply read a summary of Noam Chomsky. Either you read it or you don't, either you're familiar with him or you're not. Clearly you choose not to and I don't care. I never expected you to read it, just pointing out that books have been written on the very topic of the myth of the liberal media, studies have been conducted, thousands of man hours have been put into this which far outweighs your anecdotal evidence and "real life" experience that the media is heavily liberal. What I can show you is actual hard evidence and facts that prove otherwise but you've already made it clear you are not hearing any of that; your mind is made, facts be damned!

There is only so much patience I have when it comes to intentional ignorance. I don't care if people disagree with me; discussion is always welcome, conversations are often than best when multiple viewpoints are on the table. But when people behave like you are, wasting others time and refusing to engage in a productive conversation, then fuck it, stop talking if you are going to be that narrow minded. What point is there other than being a cunt?

Speaking of cunts, there are plenty of trolls as it is on this forum like ReSpawn, the Australian neo nazi who was rejected by American women which filled his miserable pathetic heart full of hate and sadness to the point where the only enjoyment he receives out of life is logging onto the siccness and "trolling" with Nazi names and words and talking about teh Jews. You realize how sad it is for a fascist to post on the siccness? Don't troll, don't end up like ReSpawn, it's not a life for anyone to live.

dude. first of all. i never asked you a question i asked McFuckerson. you then suggested that i have selective reading or some shit because you felt the need to bust out paragraphs to show me what you swear i missed.

thanks for the owner info. but what that easily shows is the handful of corporation entities. im not going to sit and make a list of media (mainstream and otherwise), social media, do field studies, polls, tv show screening discussions and other extensive research, just to make you happy and utilize what you posted. if i was ever to get the appropriate amount of data, i still wouldn't know the owners of the corporations. because then theres so many things to consider. so sorry for wasting your time with that.

it's easy to call me a troll or cunt. thats your argument. didnt you call somebody a faggot a page or so back? thats not very progressive.

it is what it is. you think im super ignorant. i have no problem with your opinion. so lets leave it at that.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
dude. first of all. i never asked you a question i asked McFuckerson. you then suggested that i have selective reading or some shit because you felt the need to bust out paragraphs to show me what you swear i missed.

thanks for the owner info. but what that easily shows is the handful of corporation entities. im not going to sit and make a list of media (mainstream and otherwise), social media, do field studies, polls, tv show screening discussions and other extensive research, just to make you happy and utilize what you posted. if i was ever to get the appropriate amount of data, i still wouldn't know the owners of the corporations. because then theres so many things to consider. so sorry for wasting your time with that.

it's easy to call me a troll or cunt. thats your argument. didnt you call somebody a faggot a page or so back? thats not very progressive.

it is what it is. you think im super ignorant. i have no problem with your opinion. so lets leave it at that.
You think that's my argument, seriously? What a joke.

I Called ReSpawn a faggot because he is one, it's a fact not an opinion. Don't know what you're talking about with your "that's not progressive" comment, as if calling out a nazi troll of the forum for what he is means something.

Ignorance is a lack of information on something and in your case deliberate ignorance with how you've handled yourself in this thread by rejecting information for no reason at all other than not wanting to hear it.
 
Jun 21, 2016
892
5,398
0
Milo is a professional troll, nothing more. His whole existence is to "trigger" people. And it works. People need to stop giving him the time of day.
Anyone who has a differing opinion to you is a troll. You have already established yourself as a special snowflake here over the years, who gets triggered very easily.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113

thats a liberal outlet, always something to consider when shitting on Trump. liberals will read it and make a protest sign.
Ranking the media from liberal to conservative, based on their audiences - The Washington Post

"People who read BuzzFeed, Politico, The Washington Post and The New York Times all tend to be more liberal."... according to the Washington Post.


as far as the article, looks fucked up if you just read the headline. but all Trumps doin is not letting a $9.25 a month credit be used for internet, from what the article says. he's not taking away Lifeline. if he does, than it's a different story all together. i dont think anyone's even touched the $9.25 a month for the net.

they interviewed a business owner and threw the whole kid sob story in:

For Kajeet Inc., one of the companies that was initially granted permission to provide service through Lifeline, the news comes as a blow.

“I’m most concerned about the children we serve,” said Kajeet founder Daniel Neal. “We partner with school districts — 41 states and the District of Columbia — to provide educational broadband so that poor kids can do their homework.”



his business works with schools to teach little kids online. of course he wants that contract. but hey, schools, how about not giving mandatory lessons and homework online? not everybody has a computer or online access, or a stable home environment. if you send the kids a worksheet and/or book and even a pen if they dont have one at home, guess what? they can do the homework anywhere! and everybody can do it! i get it with college kids, but when we're talking about little kids, and even high schoolers, the idea runs into problems that wouldn't be there if the kid had a worksheet and pen. so bullshit argument.

again, according to the article, Trump doesn't seem to be taking away Lifeline, just a fairly new revision that no one touched. $9.25 a month is still available for phone service. but im sure there will be protest signs saying "Trump takes the poor's Lifeline".
 

troythemac

Deep Slumps
Feb 13, 2013
1,093
6,894
113
707
thats a liberal outlet, always something to consider when shitting on Trump. liberals will read it and make a protest sign.
Ranking the media from liberal to conservative, based on their audiences - The Washington Post

"People who read BuzzFeed, Politico, The Washington Post and The New York Times all tend to be more liberal."... according to the Washington Post.


as far as the article, looks fucked up if you just read the headline. but all Trumps doin is not letting a $9.25 a month credit be used for internet, from what the article says. he's not taking away Lifeline. if he does, than it's a different story all together. i dont think anyone's even touched the $9.25 a month for the net.

they interviewed a business owner and threw the whole kid sob story in:

For Kajeet Inc., one of the companies that was initially granted permission to provide service through Lifeline, the news comes as a blow.

“I’m most concerned about the children we serve,” said Kajeet founder Daniel Neal. “We partner with school districts — 41 states and the District of Columbia — to provide educational broadband so that poor kids can do their homework.”



his business works with schools to teach little kids online. of course he wants that contract. but hey, schools, how about not giving mandatory lessons and homework online? not everybody has a computer or online access, or a stable home environment. if you send the kids a worksheet and/or book and even a pen if they dont have one at home, guess what? they can do the homework anywhere! and everybody can do it! i get it with college kids, but when we're talking about little kids, and even high schoolers, the idea runs into problems that wouldn't be there if the kid had a worksheet and pen. so bullshit argument.

again, according to the article, Trump doesn't seem to be taking away Lifeline, just a fairly new revision that no one touched. $9.25 a month is still available for phone service. but im sure there will be protest signs saying "Trump takes the poor's Lifeline".
It's the 21st century bro. Using the internet is a big part of school, and it gets more important as you get older. Times have been changing in regard to that for years. There's nothing wrong with writing on a blackboard, or assigning worksheets, but you're being willfully ignorant if you think there aren't a lot of advantages to being able to use the internet in conjunction with physical homework/classwork.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
It's the 21st century bro. Using the internet is a big part of school, and it gets more important as you get older. Times have been changing in regard to that for years. There's nothing wrong with writing on a blackboard, or assigning worksheets, but you're being willfully ignorant if you think there aren't a lot of advantages to being able to use the internet in conjunction with physical homework/classwork.

where did i say there's no advantages? where did i say it should be cut from schools all together?

do you have kids in school? what grades? you see the good that internet homework has, but have you seen the bad? what bad have you seen?

yes, internet should be implemented within school, with schools providing the access. but to think that schools across the state/country should have mandatory homework on the internet is elitist and privileged in my opinion.

Lefties: "here poor kids, do this home work online at home! you dont have a computer? it's ok! you have a computer but everyone jumps on it and wont let you do homework? it's ok, tell your parents! oh, your parents wont regulate? it's ok! you dont really have a home, and everyday you kind of stay with someone else? it's ok! i feel happy!