Trump's immigration ban sends shockwaves

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Actually, these graphs are not accurate, although they are correct in the fact that the so-called left (i.e. Democratic Party) moved to the right decades ago.
This is actually a very good representation on where people stand when discussing Left vs Right, Authoritarian vs Libertarian.

And my entire point in posting them is to show what you just said - the Democrats and the "left" of this country is actually to the right on the political spectrum, or Center-right at best. There is a big misconception in this country on what "left" really is when in reality the American left is to the right.

Anyway, Hillary is actually less right (more left) than Obama. Based on voting records alone while in Senate, Obama was more left than 82% of the Senate, while Clinton was more left than 85%.
That is what the graphs show, look again. Hillary is to the left of Obama. Not by much but to the left nonetheless.

The context of my post is in a discussion with Foul Mouth who is claiming there is huge leftist biased in the media and that this country is influenced heavily by the left, which I disagree with being that there is NO left in this country with any sort of power nor is the mainstream media far left. None of them are (lesser known media outlets sure of course, but not mainstream (he also incorrectly said I think info wars is mainstream media which of course it isn't)).

Foul Mouth I've learned groups everything together. He thinks left = liberal. He has a very black and white incredibly simple understanding. You and I both know left does not mean liberal. Liberals are just as guilty as the far right for much of our problems. Any type of real left in America is nearly nonexistent and the pockets of them scattered across this country do not have a loud voice. At best there is Bernie Sanders, but he is one man and isn't part of some leftist working class party and he is the most relevant "leftist" in politics, one of the only ones that people actually know of. Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader, couple others on a much smaller level.

Also, for people to say Bill and Hillary have identical politics is a false assumption. Based on their public statements and fundraising bases, Bill was less to the left than Hillary, historically.
That's true but they aren't too far apart either. It's also easier painting a clearer picture with a president since there is so much data to go off. It's probably more difficult to understand Hillarys true position on a lot matters since she's flip flopped so many times and is a charlatan, a corporate whore who will change stances based on what corporate interests are that day.


Anyway, at the end of the day it is semantics because all of these people are for the State (maybe we should insert whores to the banking cartel here), not the people.
Being for the state isn't necessarily a bad thing but this is probably a matter of semantics as well as you probably have something different than me in mind.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
what company owns them? and which news outlets are owned by who?
What this is news to you? You think each news outlets is independent? There are 4 or 5 companies that own almost all of the media, the ones that matter anyway.

I'm not going to list every single media outlet these companies own since that would takes hours but it's all available online, Wikipedia, whatever it's all open information no secret.

Comcast. Comcast owns a shit ton of media and TV networks obviously, a massive amount. $74.51 billion (NBCUniversal: $28.46 billion).

The Walt Disney Company. Obviously anything with Disney in name, all their TV stations like ESPN, ABC, approximately 30 radio stations, music, video game, and book publishing companies, production companies Touchstone, Marvel Entertainment, Lucasfilm, Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios, etc etc, and they control the Hearst Corporation,which is of course an American mass media and business information conglomerate (owns TV stations, newspapers, magazines, etc.)

National Amusements, Inc. (owns Viacom and CBS Corporation). Sumner Redstone, holds 80% of the company, and Shari Redstone, owns the 20℅. , cable networks CBS Sports Network, Showtime, Pop; 30 television stations; CBS Radio, Inc., which has 130 stations; CBS Television Studios; book publisher Simon & Schuster.
owner of Paramount Pictures

Time Warner. CNN, HBO, Cinemax, Cartoon Network/Adult Swim, HLN, NBA TV, TBS, TNT, etc etc etc.

21st Century Fox. Fox Business Network, Fox Sports 1, Fox Sports 2, National Geographic, Nat Geo Wild, FX, FXX, FX Movie Channel.

When it comes to Print, almost all is owned by a few Billionaires if not owned by the companies i mentioned above, including The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, in addition to magazines, local papers and online publications. They are owned by Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

Carlos Slim owns 20℅ of the New York Times.

what you posted doesn't mean anything. at all. is that supposed to prove that the mainstream media is not liberal?
It isn't liberal bias. The claim is entirely unfounded, probably because it's something you hear conservatives repeat over and over for decades. The truth is it isn't there. Independent Watch Dog agencies have done huge investigative reports over the years numerous times and have never found the claim to be true. What they find instead is Corporate bias and power bias. Corporate bias is a huge problem with our media, it's absolutely insane what our media gets away with. Whatever interests tje corporate owners of the media has, that is the bias.

What you confuse with liberal bias is probably the bullshit racism topics thats always on tje news. So you flip to a "liberal news channel" and they are talking about how a black man died by the hands of a white man and it's an outrage and you probably think, "damn liberals!". This is actually something else, this is keeping the counter divided. There is more racism talk now than there probably was in the 60s! This country is far easier to rule when the people are divided on race, divided on immigration, divided on shit that really doesn't even matter when we are all in the same boat as workers of this country. But keep us divided and we will never progress, which is by design. It's in their interest to keep talking about the same old shit every night, get people pissed off so they rant on Facebook and argue with relatives and coworkers about race, abortion, guns or whatever the hot topic is that month.




stop it. lookin at what you posted as proof that the media aint liberal/left bias is like reading the bible and believing the book. your goin by what somebody doodled together. it doesnt mean it works in modern national politics with 2 parties, on an "everyday" basis. the media and Hollywood (all rich people and corporations) are bias. if you have a left/liberal bias then it only plays into 1 of 2 parties/ideologies. which party is the rich racist women haters? which party is for the people? you're wearing 3D x-ray night vision glasses and your looking at a black dot.
See, this is what I'm talking about. You're so closed minded that everything is liberal vs conservative, or Democrat vs Republican, everything is either or. Nicely divided.






the article fear mongers like your doin. you're sayin it's Trumps policy, what's the policy? did he sign anything that the article is about? you can disagree with Trump's policy and not be a fear monger'er. but if your here spreading fear of mass deportations and broken families (like you are with the article), speculating what's going to happen, before anything of the sort is even signed, or really understood, or even written, then yes, that is fear mongering. you had it twisted prior.
Fuck man, this is why it's so hard talking you. I simply quoted the article because you asked WHY people would have a problem with it and since the article you were talking about provided the very answers to your questions I provided them for you.




im not reading a book with that title.
Of course you're not, what a shocker! Also not surprising you have no clue who he is.
 

Mike Manson

Still Livin'
Apr 16, 2005
8,998
19,412
113
44
F @fuck y and @206 I have zero fear of refugees, I don't consider Muslims bad people at all. I don't think they have bad intentions. I recognize if I was in their position I would be trying to get away from the shit too. I don't think its a good idea to bring them here to live off tax dollars. Thats just my opinion men

I can tell you for certain that if the USA was a war torn shit hole Id rather flee to Canada and get a job than China to live off the gov, or live in a safe part of the country(maybe Florida), I think I'd have a better chance for success in a culture I was more used to.
I don't know if I understood it correctly, but why would any middle eastern refugee go to the US for welfare etc.?! In Germany people get apartments, money, TVs, washing machines, clothes, furniture, etc. all paid for by the government. That's why Germany already took in over one million refugees in a short time. Y'all are pretty pathetic...and in China there is no living off the government. You don't work, you don't eat. Pure capitalism...
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
This is actually a very good representation on where people stand when discussing Left vs Right, Authoritarian vs Libertarian.

And my entire point in posting them is to show what you just said - the Democrats and the "left" of this country is actually to the right on the political spectrum, or Center-right at best. There is a big misconception in this country on what "left" really is when in reality the American left is to the right.

you're from Washington? so people up there use that definition when speaking about modern national politics? not just in your club. but that's how they talk up there everyday on the street? i've seen news footage from up there and i've only seen them use Left vs Right like the rest of mainstream america. do you still write with ink and a feather? i dont give a fuck what you read or what it tells you. im talkin bout America and American people., right now. when i see Young Turks and MSNBC slam "the right", they are speaking on the conservatives/republicans. when Fox News slams "the left", it is to liberals/democrats. who gives a fuck what the misconception is? are you banning slang from the dictionary? talk how the people talk. you cant seem to do that. the 2 parties drew a line in American soil. your words aren't changing that. the line has nothing to do with what your on.

come and talk like that in California and see how it works. people will look at you funny and/or ignore you. not just California.



(he also incorrectly said I think info wars is mainstream media which of course it isn't)).
where?





Foul Mouth I've learned groups everything together. He thinks left = liberal. He has a very black and white incredibly simple understanding.
thats fine.



Any type of real left in America is nearly nonexistent and the pockets of them scattered across this country do not have a loud voice.
so why don't you just use your "industry lingo" within your communism club? it'll make more sense and have more value in there. the value of your dialect is nonexistent in mainstream America. again, use that type of terminology on everyday American streets and it doesn't work. your doin 22 much with it. you said it all with this quoted post: Any type of real left in America is nearly nonexistent. so why sit here and type and act extra with it that what your saying holds any value in todays America? 22 much.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
you're from Washington? so people up there use that definition when speaking about modern national politics? not just in your club. but that's how they talk up there everyday on the street? i've seen news footage from up there and i've only seen them use Left vs Right like the rest of mainstream america. do you still write with ink and a feather? i dont give a fuck what you read or what it tells you. im talkin bout America and American people., right now. when i see Young Turks and MSNBC slam "the right", they are speaking on the conservatives/republicans. when Fox News slams "the left", it is to liberals/democrats. who gives a fuck what the misconception is? are you banning slang from the dictionary? talk how the people talk. you cant seem to do that. the 2 parties drew a line in American soil. your words aren't changing that. the line has nothing to do with what your on.
What the fuck. Pure ignorance. This is why talking to you is pointless as fuck.

come and talk like that in California and see how it works. people will look at you funny and/or ignore you. not just California.
Haha are you serious right now?

ok man, I'll try to dumb it down for you in the future.



so why don't you just use your "industry lingo" within your communism club? it'll make more sense and have more value in there. the value of your dialect is nonexistent in mainstream America. again, use that type of terminology on everyday American streets and it doesn't work. your doin 22 much with it. you said it all with this quoted post: Any type of real left in America is nearly nonexistent. so why sit here and type and act extra with it that what your saying holds any value in todays America? 22 much.
Right because my "dialect" and "industry lingo" of complex terms like "left" and "right" are so overly complicated that the average American in the street won't understand. No, sorry, that's just you. Thanks for wasting everyone's time though.
 
Last edited:
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
What this is news to you? You think each news outlets is independent? There are 4 or 5 companies that own almost all of the media, the ones that matter anyway.

I'm not going to list every single media outlet these companies own since that would takes hours but it's all available online, Wikipedia, whatever it's all open information no secret.

Comcast. Comcast owns a shit ton of media and TV networks obviously, a massive amount. $74.51 billion (NBCUniversal: $28.46 billion).

The Walt Disney Company. Obviously anything with Disney in name, all their TV stations like ESPN, ABC, approximately 30 radio stations, music, video game, and book publishing companies, production companies Touchstone, Marvel Entertainment, Lucasfilm, Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios, etc etc, and they control the Hearst Corporation,which is of course an American mass media and business information conglomerate (owns TV stations, newspapers, magazines, etc.)

National Amusements, Inc. (owns Viacom and CBS Corporation). Sumner Redstone, holds 80% of the company, and Shari Redstone, owns the 20℅. , cable networks CBS Sports Network, Showtime, Pop; 30 television stations; CBS Radio, Inc., which has 130 stations; CBS Television Studios; book publisher Simon & Schuster.
owner of Paramount Pictures

Time Warner. CNN, HBO, Cinemax, Cartoon Network/Adult Swim, HLN, NBA TV, TBS, TNT, etc etc etc.

21st Century Fox. Fox Business Network, Fox Sports 1, Fox Sports 2, National Geographic, Nat Geo Wild, FX, FXX, FX Movie Channel.

When it comes to Print, almost all is owned by a few Billionaires if not owned by the companies i mentioned above, including The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, in addition to magazines, local papers and online publications. They are owned by Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

Carlos Slim owns 20℅ of the New York Times.

again. nothing shows there is no bias. thanks for the info but this isn't what i asked for. FOX News isn't bias? c'mon, your ideology says they aren't biased?
(i use FOX News as a example since everybody understands Fox News is bias.



It isn't liberal bias. The claim is entirely unfounded, probably because it's something you hear conservatives repeat over and over for decades. The truth is it isn't there. Independent Watch Dog agencies have done huge investigative reports over the years numerous times and have never found the claim to be true. What they find instead is Corporate bias and power bias. Corporate bias is a huge problem with our media, it's absolutely insane what our media gets away with. Whatever interests tje corporate owners of the media has, that is the bias.
conservatives coulda been sayin the media has a liberal bias for decades, it wouldn't have affected me. im not a conservative and i question anything that is shitting on the left. just like i question anything that shits on the right. that's why the links i posted were not from a right wing source. i would have questioned those. as far as corporate/power bias, i believe that, and thats what it comes down to. for some reason it trickles down into mainstream (and non-mainstream) news, and Hollywood. as far as those Watch Dog agencies, that dont tell me shit. you can read numbers or you can pay attention to physical life. they dont always go hand and hand with what the spokesman reads. if numbers and spokesmen are what really counted then Hillary would be president.



What you confuse with liberal bias is probably the bullshit racism topics thats always on tje news. So you flip to a "liberal news channel" and they are talking about how a black man died by the hands of a white man and it's an outrage and you probably think, "damn liberals!". This is actually something else, this is keeping the counter divided. There is more racism talk now than there probably was in the 60s! This country is far easier to rule when the people are divided
no. i dont confuse it with racism. there is a line in the sand that says these are liberal ideas and these are conservative ideas. its very simple. it shouldnt be. but it is.




See, this is what I'm talking about. You're so closed minded that everything is liberal vs conservative, or Democrat vs Republican, everything is either or. Nicely divided.
im speaking like an American. to Americans. you cant seem to grasp that idea. very very very few Americans totally stick to one parties ideology. they might keep a lot of that shit in amongst family, friends, community, but barely anyone holds 100% true to either set of ideologies, in their own head/heart. in reality, which you are not in, there are 2 parties. 2 separate sets of ideologies. nothing is black and white. but with the 2 parties, its black or white. to registered D's or R's its black or white. to dumb asses on social media and protesting, its black or white. to Hollywood, i'ts black or white. some dumb fucks started fuckin up Cal Berkeley last night. all those protesters cannot have the exact same ideology, but they were 1 under Democrats last night.





Fuck man, this is why it's so hard talking you. I simply quoted the article because you asked WHY people would have a problem with it and since the article you were talking about provided the very answers to your questions I provided them for you.
i technically asked McFuckerson what the issue was, since he posted it, assuming he had an issue. i read what you read, the first time around. your just emotional about it. you see it as "truth", speculation as truth. i see it as something different.




Of course you're not, what a shocker! Also not surprising you have no clue who he is.
so read a book with an obvious political tilt, that you, with your political tilt, recommends, cus it fits in with your ideology? i read the summary and that's all i need to read to know where he stands and how he spews what he learns. then i onced over his wiki and it all made sense.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
What the fuck. Pure ignorance. This is why talking to you is pointless as fuck.



Haha are you serious right now?

ok man, I'll try to dumb it down for you in the future.





Right because my "dialect" and "industry lingo" of complex terms like "left" and "right" are so overly complicated that the average American in the street won't understand. No, sorry, that's just you. Thanks for wasting everyone's time though.

your in your own world. Left and Right, politically mean one side or the other. in USA 20017. there is no party for if you are pro bible and pro choice. what party is pro Jerry Brown and pro Trump? it doesnt give a fuck that you dont agree with it, or that you have a different definition. where are majority of Bernie supporters in mainstream America? on the left with Democrats. Bernie aint like Obama or Hillary, his supporters are still on the left with Democrats. didn't the DNC fuck over Bernie? they threw a wrench in his gears, to stop him from what? yes, leading and representing the left, the Democratic party. your tryng to get way too deep.

you can speak down to me and make me seem like the dumbest dude in America. all i see is you failing to make a point that has no value in everyday, people on the street America. what your doing is overly complicating "Left and Right" to a county that has already said "this is Left or Right". it didn't ask you for permission or for consultation.
 
Jun 21, 2016
892
5,398
0
Is fascism a problem? Because we literally have a fascist in the White House right now writing Trump's executive orders. Steve Bannon. "It can't happen here" though right? That's how it starts.
Both are fake.

Breitbart news on the other hand is praised by White Nationalists, gee I wonder why? Maybe LiterACola is down with that ideology too, idk
I wonder who the fascists are, a gay jew speaking out about radical islam, or the antifa ferals beating people to death for having an opinion that differs from them?

You and people like you, will forever be puppets of george soros.

Twitter


lol

This discussion will be over within 48 hours anyway as Trump moves to the next outrage. People won't be able to keep up

Dearborn, Michigan 2016 - YouTube

Dearborn, MI. Shows Why Trump Is Right On Islam - YouTube
lol that's ford road, I have eaten some dope arab food there and beruit by night make good shistawooks
 
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
yesterday in berkeley is an example of the left becoming the right
prohibiting the mila dude from speaking

free speech use to be big for the left now it's hate speech

i hate using the term left and right though lol
it's meant to divide us
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
yesterday in berkeley is an example of the left becoming the right
prohibiting the mila dude from speaking

free speech use to be big for the left now it's hate speech
Left/Right according to mainstream America? or Left/Right according to 2-0's scroll?

and yeah. i saw a "lefty" on the news last night saying he's for "freedom of speech" but not "hate speech". then i saw a mark bitch pepper spraying a girl in a red "make bitcoin great again" hat directly in her face. it was very ironic how they acted at Berkeley.
 
May 22, 2006
1,365
2,349
113
42
I don't know if I understood it correctly, but why would any middle eastern refugee go to the US for welfare etc.?! In Germany people get apartments, money, TVs, washing machines, clothes, furniture, etc. all paid for by the government. That's why Germany already took in over one million refugees in a short time. Y'all are pretty pathetic...and in China there is no living off the government. You don't work, you don't eat. Pure capitalism...
Didn't mean china literally. I was meaning some place foreign as fuck with completely different cultural. China happened to be what came to mind.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
fuck left or right egging on civil war

those people that peppered sprayed are not protesters they are at every protest regardless the cause to stir up shit

they are broke ass professional protesters, while some are rich and just feel ashamed. they travel, but yet always seem to be on the side of the left, what ever issue. why weren't they at the tea party rallies fighting for that cause? cus they didn't get orders. fuck the left and right, all day, but that's not what America says. that's obvious. dismiss those protesters as pro's, which they are, but they still are a weapon for an agenda.
 
Props: GTS and GTS
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I wonder who the fascists are, a gay jew speaking out about radical islam, or the antifa ferals beating people to death for having an opinion that differs from them?

You and people like you, will forever be puppets of george soros.



lol that's ford road, I have eaten some dope arab food there and beruit by night make good shistawooks
And aren't you a nazi who posts on a gangsta website? Haha get real faggot
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
And aren't you a nazi who posts on a gangsta website? Haha get real faggot
Yes, that is him. I have no idea how you can be a nazi, and like rap. Makes literally no sense.

Of course, this is the same mark ass bitch that went captain save-a-hoe on some hood rat in Detroit, and got kicked to the curb. All the way back to Australia to be exact. Trynna call people "cucks". Bitch, you the very definition of a cuck, dumbass.
 
Last edited: