Timbaland get caught stealing from an other artist??!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 21, 2002
1,463
2
0
52
#25
musiikki said:
The way I see it, Timbaland (nor the production team behind him) didn't add too much to the original song.
He just layered some samples over the snare and added a few bassdrum hits to the rhythm. Hihat was altered by some EQ'ing but still are pretty recognizable. Then some double tempo hihat was played over.
Original bassline was EQ'ed out but it still hears playing on the backround. He played pretty much the same over it just without highest notes..
Of course pop song will need some chorus to standout from rest of the song so they added this simple pim-pom melody over it..

It is still the same track but little more slam to it to cut it through in modern pop. Really, I think it took them 5 minutes to make these basic things to it. And really, I think it didn't take too much skill either.

Edit: About sampling... This went waaayy beyond sampling and since it was done without permission from the original artist, THIS WAS STRAIGHT UP STEALING OTHER PEOPLES WORK!
Check this youtube video where some guy clarifies some points about differences of sampling and this case:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnF57sSUFAs&watch_response

edit: changed my remarks about the bassdrum
I watched the youtube video and i understand what you and he are saying but i don't agree.

Firstly who is he to say what sampling is, how did he become the authority, i couldnt personally give a flying fuck about his masters degree. I grew up on Hip Hop since 1986 - i was there the first time around when people were talking about 'sampling / using other peoples music in there own'

Would you agree that Timbaland has his roots in Hip Hop music? as a hip hop producer in my eyes he has a licence to sample what ever he wants. Have you heard Eric B and Rakim's I Know you got soul?, play that back to back with the original James Brown song and see how little of it they changed.

So Timbaland used parts of a 8bit demo from Finland = FUCKIN GENIUS, that is creative sampling. You even admit the Timbaland version is different, he added things he changed the arrangement, had a vocalist write lyrics to it. It became something else at that point, it is not the same thing Tempest did, even though it contains portions of it.

This is not the whole of Timbalands career, this is one beat out of hundreds we have heard and maybe millions he has made we havent heard. What Timbaland saw in the Tempest beat is a good melody and some cool sounds, so he jacked them and put them to good use.

One thing i did agree with was that this expose has inadvertadly given Tempest mass exposure, and he should be thankful

The only reason everybody is so upset comes down to one thing as always MONEY, if someone sampled that beat in their bedroom and put it on myspace and that was the end of it would anybody care? probably not, it's the fact Timbaland got bread that got everybody in Finland crying.
 
May 10, 2002
4,203
7
38
48
#26
Bottom line is Timbo got caught. He thought he was being slick by jacking some obscure piece of music. Where he went wrong was that he used it for an artist who obviously has an international audience (duh, Timmy) and he got caught. Not to mention the ringtone thing. So essentially, he jacked someone's intellectual property, used it to make money once (ringtone) then re-gifted (Seinfeld anyone) it to Nelly Furtado. All of this without clearing it.

Everyone who is defending Timbaland here is doing so from the Hip Hop perspective. In Hip Hop, people sample, interpolate, and/or outright steal other people's creations (sometimes without giving proper credit) and it's widely accepted... Wait... I said that wrong... It's ENCOURAGED.

You look at a cat like Kanye West who is very outspoken about how he samples music that he can't create himself and people find that arrogant. Especially those people of the starving artist variety.

You look at Dr Dre, who, during like a 4 year stretch was sued multiple times (Eminem - "I'll Kill You" & "Guilty Conscience", Xzibit - "X", Dr Dre 2001 - "Let's Get High") for sampling or outright jacking someone's music and not giving them credit. I'm sure he's gotten away with a lot more than we know (Phone Tap for example is from some spanish guitar record). If he gets caught, meh, he'll just cut a check and that's the end of it. People find the fact that he can just steal other people's creations, make money off of it and get away with it time after time arrogant. Especially since there are laws out there that prohibit this very thing.

After a while, it's not so much the fact that people are sampling that's the problem. It's the perceived arrogance of some of these cats when it comes to the subject. People have a problem with the 'haves' feeling like it's ok to just take from the 'have nots' and not give proper credit. It's a pretty simple concept and if it happened to you, you'd be mad. It's cool to front and act like you wouldn't be mad. But you'd be pissed if you got jacked and didn't receive any credit. Especially if a hit record was made with what was jacked from you.
 
May 10, 2002
4,203
7
38
48
#27
Mak Deniro said:
The only reason everybody is so upset comes down to one thing as always MONEY, if someone sampled that beat in their bedroom and put it on myspace and that was the end of it would anybody care? probably not, it's the fact Timbaland got bread that got everybody in Finland crying.
So it's ok for Timbaland to "get his money" by jacking someone else's music but it's not ok for the individual who created the original to "get his money"?
 
May 21, 2002
1,463
2
0
52
#28
^^ Thats not what i said, should the guy be credited / acknowledged for his parts of the beat - i didnt even go into that. All i'm saying is the reason this whole thing is important to people is because it involves money.

read again what i typed.

if someone sampled that beat in their bedroom and put it on myspace and that was the end of it would anybody care? probably not
 
May 10, 2002
4,203
7
38
48
#29
Mak Deniro said:
if someone sampled that beat in their bedroom and put it on myspace and that was the end of it would anybody care? probably not
That's a bullshit copout.

The music business is about money. The finnish cat is most likely trying to make money in the business and Timbaland is trying to make money. So what are you actually saying with that statement? Nothing really...
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#30
lol...big deal!

The guy who created the original did/will get his money...and it will be more than what he would have received trying to put it out there on his own.

He'll get paid and he will be happy.
 
May 12, 2002
5,473
299
83
40
www.glmc.gemm.com
#33
MrPeete said:
He and other great producers have done this more times than we know. Timbaland just got caught this time.

There was like a 4 year period where Dr Dre was sued at least once a year by different people who's tracks he jacked and didn't give credit.

That's the industry...
yeah I remember the Truth Hurts song. He got hit hard with that one.

A lot of people are sayin that Timmy didn't even know, and that it was a ghost producer who originally did the block party ringtone. Who knows..
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,658
0
46
Rich City
#34
its not really him stealing it anyways.....its all of the producers using the same sound from the same synth (or something emulating that synth)
 
May 12, 2002
5,473
299
83
40
www.glmc.gemm.com
#35
Mak Deniro said:
You really don't even know how many hip hop beats contain parts of something else, or are inspired by other songs and recreated.

As far as sampling goes anything is fair game, thats the beauty of it. Personally that demonstation has given me more appreciation of the Timbaland version. If i had randomly heard the Nelly Furtado track i probably wouldn't care - but understanding that the melody comes from a demo competition in Finland is genius to me.

Timbaland has a great ear and has crafted a whole other song around that groove, remember the Tempest beat is only a part of Timbaland's beat - it isnt the whole thing.

Listen to Stetsasonic 'Talkin All That Jazz' from 1988 those lyrics are still relevent today.

"Sayin' all that crap about how we sample
Given examples
Think we'll let you get away with that?
You critizie our method of how we make records
you said it wasn't art, so now we're gonna rip you apart"

Sampling is different, and yes as far is sampling goes anything is fair, and it isn't plagiarism. Usually involves some sort of homage to the art form too, ya know, got ya sayin 'shit, I know that funk/soul/rock oldie, props for pullin that one up' What Timbo did is plagiarism, it was far from a popular song, so his audience had never heard it, and he gave no props to the originator, shit, he even used similar sounds to the 8-bit MOD! People do get pissed off when you use something that someone else has done. I remember when I recreated a bass line off a Sam Bostic beat for a tune, showed it to a friend, and he wasn't all 'cool, you used a Sam Bostic bassline', he was frownin and shit sayin 'nah blud I heard that before, what is it'..

Oh well.. I'd be PISSED OFF if someone stole a tight beat from me. Shit remind me of this Static Shock ep. i saw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnf7Nbt8lUY
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
42
#36
What Timbo did was perfectly legal, might have been unethical, but it was fair game. Look at the song Down Bottom on the Ruff Ryders Volume 1 album....Swizz Beats took the melody for that song straight off of a Casio keyboard...and it was the demo song for it !