SEATTLE GOT ROBBED

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Cmoke

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
41
#62
i dont like either team...but that rothlisberger TD where he NEVER CROSSED THE GOALINE.....was 100% bullshit. and the fact that it was reviewed.....and still not overturned, is proof to me that somone was payed off....cuz im not an official or a ref but i can DAMN WELL TELL YOU THAT BALL NEVER GOT ACCROSS.....then they called that touchdown by seattle offensive pass interferance.....haha ok. the dude barley even touched him...


just goes to show you. its all about money. horrible superbowl.
 
Dec 31, 2005
1,273
0
0
#63
dont u need just a body part to cross the goaline for it to be a touchdown i remember watching a falcons game and vick didnt put the ball across the goaline but his hand and it was ruled a td because of it and for the seattle pass interference they couldve challenged it but didnt their fault
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#64
sCiEnTisT925 said:
dont u need just a body part to cross the goaline for it to be a touchdown i remember watching a falcons game and vick didnt put the ball across the goaline but his hand and it was ruled a td because of it and for the seattle pass interference they couldve challenged it but didnt their fault
you can't challenge against a P.I. call, Same thing was called against Moss earlier in the season against KC but it wasn't challengable since there was a penalty flag
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#66
sCiEnTisT925 said:
o what do u mean by penalty flag tho theres always a flag when theres a penalty
yeah thats the point,, you can't challenge against a penalty ( example: holding, pushing, false starts, etc. )
 

Cmoke

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
41
#68
uh, well its obvious u dont know shit about football..but to clear it up for your dumbass....the BALL must cross the line the BALL.

and u cant challenge pass interferance calls.. nice try though..

these things change the game wiether u wanna admitt to it or not..
 
Apr 14, 2003
6,415
154
63
39
#69
Dirty Shoez said:
EAZY LOCZ = SUX!!!

NEVER BUYING UR ALBUM EVER, SORRY!!! U SUX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What does this have to do with the game? You think I'm really sad now that your not going to by my album?? LoL. Get with the program homie. Cuz your team got beat you gotta hate my music? LoL
 

Cmoke

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
41
#70
dont worry that little internet guru never contributes to the topic at hand.....hes always busy embarassing himself with his internet lingo and cool little smiley faces.
 
Nov 6, 2004
2,539
1
0
45
#71
even with the bad calls, the seahawks still had a chance to win the game and they didnt. they allowed a 75 yd td run and a trick td pass to ward. they lost accept it.
 
May 27, 2002
2,804
0
0
www.google.com
#72
Five pages of sad Seahawks fans complaining about calls no one will care about next month. Give it up, no matter how much you complain the calls are not going to be changed and your team is not going to be awarded the SuperBowl. Steelers are SuperBowl champions, Seahawks aren't. And some of you are so stupid that you are going to clown a person's city just because they don't agree with you? What does their location have to do with your team losing? Give it up guys. Oh by the way, I'm not a Steelers fan or a Seahawks fan, I was just watching the game for entertainment.
 
Jun 11, 2002
756
2
18
www.soundclick.com
#73
once again another dumb son of a bitch that did not see the game...if you don't have shit to say that is relevant,then shut your gay ass dumbshit......wether the hawks won or loss...THE REFS BLEW IT...maybe you should get on your tivo and replay that shit.......ps...fuck yourself
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#74
Crazy, I watched the entire game, and although I saw some questionable calls, I did not see all of this coming. Only two plays are worth Seahawk' fans griping over; the Darrell Jackson P.I. and the Ben Roth. touchdown. My opinion:

Darrell Jackson PI: I think the "push" was small and may not have been what landed the ball in Jackson's hands for the negated touchdown. He could have caught the ball between his legs, behind his back or even doing the splits in the air for all we know, all without touching the defender. Unfortunatley that is not the criteria. According to the rulebook an offensive player commits pass interference when "Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating a separation in an attempt to catch a pass." Now you can call it what you want, a tough or a push, but in my opinion it did create seperation between him and the defender. And I think the ref's were correct in calling the penalty in accordance with the NFL rulebook. Again, I'm not saying he wouldn't have caught the ball without the push. I look at this similar to the way a punt return gets called back for a holding that occured against a player who had NO CHANCE of tackling the ball runner.

Ben Roth TD: Way too close to tell, but if I had to choose I would say that it was not a touchdown. The way I see it, if the ref's called him down at the one inch line and it was reviewed, the call would stand as not being a touchdown. Either way the call was standing.
 
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#75
Hey you have to add the bad call of the plus 15 on hassleback when he made the tackle, he was clearly going after the guy with the ball, that was a bad call.
 
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#76
Cmoke said:
i dont like either team...but that rothlisberger TD where he NEVER CROSSED THE GOALINE.....was 100% bullshit. and the fact that it was reviewed.....and still not overturned, is proof to me that somone was payed off....cuz im not an official or a ref but i can DAMN WELL TELL YOU THAT BALL NEVER GOT ACCROSS.....then they called that touchdown by seattle offensive pass interferance.....haha ok. the dude barley even touched him...


just goes to show you. its all about money. horrible superbowl.
thats real talk, i mean that was a little pitty patt push and shit, it's not like when he pushed off it changed the defenders position, mothafucka didnt even budge
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#77
It doesn't have to change the defenders position, it just has to create seperation. Jackson touched him, extended his arm and created distance.
 
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#79
Solitary 1 said:
YOU SEAKHAWKS FANS NEED TO QUIT CRYN'! YOU THINK YALL GOT JOBBED!?!? TRY BEING A RAIDER FAN!

FUCKIN EXACTLY. OH wait hopp onto another thread and dvious will tell you the Raiders suck balls anyways.
 

MURK

Sicc OG
Oct 18, 2003
1,165
0
0
39
www.myspace.com
#80
YALL BANDWAGONING CRY BABY BITCHES NEED TO SHUT THE FUCK UP AND FIND A NEW TEAM TO LIKE LIKE U GUYS HAVE BEEN EVERY YEAR

BEN BROKE THE FUCKIN PLAIN WHILE HE WAS IN THE AIR AND GOT PUSHED BACK

WANNA BLAME THE REFS ABOUT THE LOSS? HOW ABOUT THE FUCKIN KICKER WHO MISSED 2 FG'S?

PLUS EVEN IF BEN DIDNT CROSS THEYD HAVE A 4TH AND INCHES TO RUN THE BUS UP THE GUT

TAKE A LOSS LIKE A FUCKIN MAN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP CRY BABIES