lol you know just like i do, that this is a logical fallacy.
Ooooooh really?
lol things are always over the top, doesn't matter what it is.
think about bikinis, what about 70 years ago? girls wearing bikinis would be considered prostitutes. Time changes, get over it.
For one, WHAT religion? There are PLEEEENTY of religions/cultures that allow marriage, sex and other relationship between same sex individuals, (example: Indian Hinduism, Somoan, etc.) so, don't group Judaism, Islam and Christianity as the only religions, that is a logical fallacy.
Marriage is an instution that allows two individuals to be legal bound as partners for life, incase one dies, the other will be in charge of what is left(children, house, etc.). It is NOT a religious institution because there is marriage in all cultures and all religions, so it cannot be solely religious. Plus, there are athiests that marry all the time, they do not get married in churches, and just get the LEGAL document(just like getting a legal document like social security card, etc.) to pronounce that they are married by law?
No, if you could logically and not ethnocentrically explain a reason by which 2 people who want to be legally married, and if something is to happen to one, then the other will have full custody to help decide on things, and do what is good for that person, SHOULDN'T BE LEGALLY bound to one another. then, well shit, YOU should be a lawyer! haha
This is complete bullshit, and it has been, they dismiss cases, and they just do the run around about this topic because people are scared out of no logical fear that somehow their child will BE gay because gay marriage is finally legal, LIKE IT should be.
This is at a time, let's remember, that it would be very intelligent to start adopting as many kids as we can, instead of having our own because of the overpopulation rate of human beings in the World.
But no, your Priest/Pastor/Sheikh/Rabbi tells you it is WRONG
/thread