this will lead to bigger shit, 20 years ago this would never even be considered, now it is, and your called a bigot for thinking that two ass fuckers (which is an abnormal act) should not be able to get married. whats next... people falling in love with animals and getting equal rights? this is just opening up for more abnormal shit to come
lol you know just like i do, that this is a logical fallacy.
GOD CREATED ADAM AND EVE NOT ADAM AND STEVE. YES ON 8
Ooooooh really?
that example was over the top, im just saying, the thought of same sex marriages was over the top 20 years ago, just think about it
lol things are always over the top, doesn't matter what it is.
think about bikinis, what about 70 years ago? girls wearing bikinis would be considered prostitutes. Time changes, get over it.
What if you're not homophobic but you don't believe in gay marriage? Isn't marriage traditionally a religious thing? I know it's legally binding, but the actual act of marriage is said to be between a man and a woman according to religion, right? Gay people still have the same rights as married couples if they handle their stuff correctly.
In any case, I'm not against people being gay. If that's what they want to do, I'm all for it. I'm just not sure on the whole marriage thing.
For one, WHAT religion? There are PLEEEENTY of religions/cultures that allow marriage, sex and other relationship between same sex individuals, (example: Indian Hinduism, Somoan, etc.) so, don't group Judaism, Islam and Christianity as the only religions, that is a logical fallacy.
Marriage is an instution that allows two individuals to be legal bound as partners for life, incase one dies, the other will be in charge of what is left(children, house, etc.). It is NOT a religious institution because there is marriage in all cultures and all religions, so it cannot be solely religious. Plus, there are athiests that marry all the time, they do not get married in churches, and just get the
LEGAL document(just like getting a legal document like social security card, etc.) to pronounce that they are married by law?
No, if you could logically and not ethnocentrically explain a reason by which 2 people who want to be legally married, and if something is to happen to one, then the other will have full custody to help decide on things, and do what is good for that person, SHOULDN'T BE
LEGALLY bound to one another. then, well shit, YOU should be a lawyer! haha
This is complete bullshit, and it has been, they dismiss cases, and they just do the run around about this topic because people are scared out of no logical fear that somehow their child will BE gay because gay marriage is finally legal, LIKE IT should be.
This is at a time, let's remember, that it would be very intelligent to start adopting as many kids as we can, instead of having our own because of the overpopulation rate of human beings in the World.
But no, your Priest/Pastor/Sheikh/Rabbi tells you it is WRONG
/thread