peyton manning is the biggest choke artist in the history of sports

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#41
Retard statement how many other sports do you watch? PM has won a superbowl before its not like he is a choke artist like Bill Buckner.
bill buckner lost game 6 for the sox yes. not game 7.

manning has bombed many a times. the only reason they won the super bowl was because of the defense covering mannings ass in the playoffs in 06.

the only meaningful game hes ever won was the afccg vs the pats in 06. the bears werent exactly an offensive juggernaut that year. the nfc was weak. what other big games has he won??????
 
Mar 10, 2007
2,603
57
0
38
#43
ever heard of drew brees?

aside from 1 super bowl win (which should be credited more to his team than him) the dude has choked in almost every major game hes ever played dating back to high school.
uhh.. look at what he did in the playoffs and super bowl this year.. how is that choking?
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#44
Peyton didn't choke. Get ya mind right. The corner just read it right and made the play.
People don't wanna hear that shit. They have to blame the QB at all times.

The Saints caught the Colts off guard at the beginning of the second half with that onside kick and THAT is what killed Indianapolis. QBs throw INTs all the time and Peyton played a good game up until that particular play. Their defense wasn't good enough to stop Brees and the Colts were out-coached.

People just want to find a reason for the mighty to fall.
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
#47
GTFOH until Manning has a defense that carries him like Brady's did for him 3 times.

If Peyton Manning had a defense the caliber of NE's championship teams he'd probably have 4 or 5 championships and Sunday's game would have been a win.

Manning >>>>>>>>>>>> Brady
gtfoh manning has always had a sicc line that doesnt allow him to get touched and a sicc defense. also mannings running game has always been better than what brady has to work with. Also reggie wayne and marvin harrison and clark shit on any reciever that brady has had for the exception of moss.

BRADY>MANNING
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
44
#52
gtfoh manning has always had a sicc line that doesnt allow him to get touched and a sicc defense. also mannings running game has always been better than what brady has to work with. Also reggie wayne and marvin harrison and clark shit on any reciever that brady has had for the exception of moss.

BRADY>MANNING
You always fail to remember the Patriots had one of the best defenses when they won there rings, the Colts have never had that great of a defense. I said it a million times Tom Brady cant do what Peyton does. Ive also said before give Peyton a defense like the Steelers and he would have 5 superbowl rings by now.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#53
gtfoh manning has always had a sicc line that doesnt allow him to get touched and a sicc defense.
You've said a lot of stupid things on this forum and I've kicked back and never called you on it for the simple fact you're a Niner fan, but saying Manning has "always had a 'sicc' defense" truly shows how little you know about football. I won't even provide evidence because everyone with half a fuckin brain understands Peyton rarely gets help from that defense, and when he does he's won it all. If his defense was anything close to "sicc" he would have 3-4 rings by now. Brady's defenses were "sick," Peyton's have either been at or below average - at best.

As for the O-Line.. Do you bother to watch Tom Brady? When does he ever get hit? His line is just as good and during his championship years it was probably better. Look what happened the one time a team actually put pressure on him - he lost the fuckin Super Bowl.

Peyton Manning does so much more than any other QB it's not even close, but I honestly wouldn't expect you to know or understand what I'm talking about when I say that.


IronLungs420 said:
also mannings running game has always been better than what brady has to work with.
What the fuck are you talking about? Both running games have sucked balls for years. You must be thinking of back in the day when Edge was in Indianapolis, but Peyton has proven to be successful without a good running game for many years.

You're the type of guy that thinks Joseph Addai was tearing shit up in the Super Bowl, not understand that the Saints weren't focused on trying to stop the league's WORST running game, but rather to stop the league's motherfucking MVP and THAT is why Addai was successful. There are strategies and concepts in football that you will never understand.


IronLungs420 said:
Also reggie wayne and marvin harrison and clark shit on any reciever that brady has had for the exception of moss.

BRADY>MANNING
Did you not see Manning light it up with Austin Collie? Really, who the fuck is Austin Collie? What about Pierre Garcon? These are NOBODIES. The guys Brady was working with are better than these guys, yet Peyton can still get them the fucking ball.

And since you want to default to the old "Brady had no big-name receivers" argument, do you think he's better than Joe Montana? Cuz, you know, Montana had the greatest receiver of all time to throw to, right? He also had John Taylor and Dwight Clark. Does that make Montana any less of a QB?

On top of all that, the guys Brady had were no slouches. They ran routes, got open and fuckin CAUGHT THE BALL. Find a new angle if you want to ride Tom Brady's dick, cuz that one is old and played the fuck out.

Brady is a system QB. Look at what whack ass Matt Cassell was able to do in Bellicheat's system. Their coach has them set up for success. Peyton Manning IS the system in Indianapolis.

Now, let's see what mind-blowing argument you provide in return.. I won't be expecting much. After all, you are the same guy that insists on calling the raiders the "RaidTurds." That says it all.
 
Oct 2, 2006
4,405
42
0
37
#55
You've said a lot of stupid things on this forum and I've kicked back and never called you on it for the simple fact you're a Niner fan, but saying Manning has "always had a 'sicc' defense" truly shows how little you know about football. I won't even provide evidence because everyone with half a fuckin brain understands Peyton rarely gets help from that defense, and when he does he's won it all. If his defense was anything close to "sicc" he would have 3-4 rings by now. Brady's defenses were "sick," Peyton's have either been at or below average - at best.

As for the O-Line.. Do you bother to watch Tom Brady? When does he ever get hit? His line is just as good and during his championship years it was probably better. Look what happened the one time a team actually put pressure on him - he lost the fuckin Super Bowl.

Peyton Manning does so much more than any other QB it's not even close, but I honestly wouldn't expect you to know or understand what I'm talking about when I say that.




What the fuck are you talking about? Both running games have sucked balls for years. You must be thinking of back in the day when Edge was in Indianapolis, but Peyton has proven to be successful without a good running game for many years.

You're the type of guy that thinks Joseph Addai was tearing shit up in the Super Bowl, not understand that the Saints weren't focused on trying to stop the league's WORST running game, but rather to stop the league's motherfucking MVP and THAT is why Addai was successful. There are strategies and concepts in football that you will never understand.




Did you not see Manning light it up with Austin Collie? Really, who the fuck is Austin Collie? What about Pierre Garcon? These are NOBODIES. The guys Brady was working with are better than these guys, yet Peyton can still get them the fucking ball.

And since you want to default to the old "Brady had no big-name receivers" argument, do you think he's better than Joe Montana? Cuz, you know, Montana had the greatest receiver of all time to throw to, right? He also had John Taylor and Dwight Clark. Does that make Montana any less of a QB?

On top of all that, the guys Brady had were no slouches. They ran routes, got open and fuckin CAUGHT THE BALL. Find a new angle if you want to ride Tom Brady's dick, cuz that one is old and played the fuck out.

Brady is a system QB. Look at what whack ass Matt Cassell was able to do in Bellicheat's system. Their coach has them set up for success. Peyton Manning IS the system in Indianapolis.

Now, let's see what mind-blowing argument you provide in return.. I won't be expecting much. After all, you are the same guy that insists on calling the raiders the "RaidTurds." That says it all.
You couldn't have summed it up any better.
 
Mar 1, 2006
4,276
1,154
0
40
www.sendearnings.com
#57

There are strategies and concepts in football that you will never understand.


[/b][/color]
There are too many like this even those who say they been fans for years still can't understand the strategies and concepts, most get a better understanding when they play the game but even then still won't get it.

I seen this first hand when I went to a Youth Football game for my cousin, the coaches who volunteered had no idea wtf they were doing, they had a good team too but didn't know how to use there weapons, doing only hitting drills and running plays without offensive line routes (O-line was just pass blocking on every play). They were running finesse running plays with big powerful guys on the line that aren't as fast to get to the next level.

Moral of the story don't volunteer to coach unless you know wtf your doing. Retards are just hurting the team by having there kids play first even though they have shit for talent just like there Coach dad.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#58
fatal is right, peyton never had a defense worth a shitstain until the year they won the superbowl. the game before the afccg indys defense carried them
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#59
There are too many like this even those who say they been fans for years still can't understand the strategies and concepts, most get a better understanding when they play the game but even then still won't get it.

I seen this first hand when I went to a Youth Football game for my cousin, the coaches who volunteered had no idea wtf they were doing, they had a good team too but didn't know how to use there weapons, doing only hitting drills and running plays without offensive line routes (O-line was just pass blocking on every play). They were running finesse running plays with big powerful guys on the line that aren't as fast to get to the next level.

Moral of the story don't volunteer to coach unless you know wtf your doing. Retards are just hurting the team by having there kids play first even though they have shit for talent just like there Coach dad.

Man I had to go through this BS when my son first signed up for pop warner... positions were already handed out before they even practiced. My son had the best hands on the team but the coach didn't give him a shot to play because his grandson had his position already set even though he would drop passe(s) repeadetly in practice while my son was blocking. My son even volunteered to run a quick slant when nobody else volunteered. He caught the ball in stride with his "hands" not like DHB and they still put him on the offensive line.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#60
Peyton will also win more rings when he becomes a coach.
peyton is the jordan of football. he would be a horrible coach because he would get frustrated at the players not living up to his caliber of play. no big name baller is ever a good coach. they are always role players.