Anaheim*Rob said:
I never said you didn't know boxing, I said you're probably not a purist. You just disregarded the man's article I posted probably because it doesn't reflect your opinion. This is why I keep my boxing arguments on here to a minimum and stick with the boxing forums. According to you, Oscar isn't Hall of Fame material and you don't even know who Stevie Johnston is, I shouldn't even be arguing with you... So you admit you're an intermediate, if so, should you even have an opinion on whether Oscar's good enough to make the HOF? That's just pure hate.
No one disregarded it, you're exaggerating to make a point.. I said it's a shame when people's opinions at face value get treated as gospel.. I'm definitely a purist, my inclusion in the club doesn't depend on Steve Kim, most definitely, he isn't that important, people like him come and go.. People like Teddy Atlas, Jim Lampley, and even Merchant have recognizable names to most intermediates and purists. Also you're using your terminology wrong, knowledge of Steve Kim does not determine who and who is not a "purist", some one who is true to the original art. This is I feel a desperate attempt to discredit my opinion, but whatever, it's still only an opinion, I'm not imposing it on you..
Quote:
So you admit you're an intermediate, if so, should you even have an opinion on whether Oscar's good enough to make the HOF? That's just pure hate.
^Again, maybe you just need a dictionary, of course I am, intermediate does not mean beginner, and no one in here is an expert obviously, so therefore we're all intermediates.. You're not making any sense at all, all of a sudden..