Official 49ers Vs Raiders Game Day Thread!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 1, 2002
2,929
567
0
42
#61
lol people getting crazy about pre-season....did they run out of parking spots or something cause hella people didn't get in me including all i went to do was a lap around that dump of a stadium, when they run out of spots at Mcfee they still have hella extra spots to park...good game though better than other pre-season games that have been on
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#65
P.K. Rippa said:
Bullshit, your starters were in there when we scored that second td.
You probably don't even fuckin know who our starters are. That's why I dropped the link that tells your ass they weren't in there.

I don't even know why this is really an arguement anyway. The raiders' starters could have blown out the Niners' starters 35-0 for all I care, there is still no way in hell the raiders are anywhere near the Niners level. PERIOD.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#66
I GOT BEATS said:
so i guess you need to find another source to base your opinion on the game when you obviously didnt watch it.
I watched it, but I admit I was pretty smashed. But I have to admit that the only reason I watched the whole preseason game is because it was the Battle Of The Bay.

And BTW, EVEN THE LINK SAYS THAT THE RAIDERS WERE DRIVING ON THE NINERS' FIRST UNIT. I didn't say they weren't. I said they SCORED the damn TD on the second unit. Our D was a mixture of 1st and 2nd units, our offense was in there until the half.


I GOT BEATS said:
exactly, but its fun to prove how low these niner fans actual knowledge of the game is.
You haven't proved shit.

But welcome to the Sports forum. I've never seen you here before (unless you changed your screenname).
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#67
I GOT BEATS said:
what does matter is how your first units do against the opposing teams first units.
Actually to be honest, that doesn't matter either.

I'll tell you why..

Most teams use schemes in their gameplans. The Niners have many blitz schemes to work with on D, and those are vital to the success of a 3-4. They rarely blitzed at all in the last 2 preseason games. They've been using a basic 3-4 package with some regular blitzes here and there. So there's really no way to tell if our D is good, decent or shitty until they start using their blitz packages. Our whole pass rush depends on those blitzes and the D-line is basically gonna be there to eat up blockers so our LBs can get in there easily. We didn't see that in this game.

I'm sure the raiders and every other team in the league is holding back their schemes as well.

It's things like that that make the preseason mean absolutely nothing. So just remember guys, these games are glorified scrimmages.. They're only played to work out kinks in the system, and sometimes to find who the starters will be because success in practice doesn't always translate to success on the field.
 
Feb 7, 2006
955
0
0
41
#69
hahahahahaha fuck the raiders
9er offense looked sharp. the starting d-line wasn't even in there. alvis whitted!! aaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! you are a raider!!!!
i recorded it on channel 5 but watched the raider commentators, damn those niggas are horrible. oakland couldnt do no wrong in their eyes. that atkinson dude sounded like he had a bottle of heem in the booth with him..maybe next time losers
 
Feb 12, 2004
7,488
886
0
39
#70
9erfitted said:
hahahahahaha fuck the raiders
9er offense looked sharp. the starting d-line wasn't even in there. alvis whitted!! aaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! you are a raider!!!!
i recorded it on channel 5 but watched the raider commentators, damn those niggas are horrible. oakland couldnt do no wrong in their eyes. that atkinson dude sounded like he had a bottle of heem in the booth with him..maybe next time losers

Hahahaha seriously!! The fucking commentators were so bad. I mean come on your broadcasting the game don't be 100% bias. Everytime the 49ers would make a good play it was because the Raiders made an ever better play.

"You see that there. The niners scored the touchdown because the Raiders had excellent pass coverage and amazing pass rush." WTF?
 
Mar 2, 2006
522
0
0
#71
BROWN GUERRERO said:
Hahahaha seriously!! The fucking commentators were so bad. I mean come on your broadcasting the game don't be 100% bias. Everytime the 49ers would make a good play it was because the Raiders made an ever better play.

"You see that there. The niners scored the touchdown because the Raiders had excellent pass coverage and amazing pass rush." WTF?
dat was funny as fuck homie..!!
 
May 22, 2003
578
0
0
43
www.dankmobb.com
#72
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
You probably don't even fuckin know who our starters are. That's why I dropped the link that tells your ass they weren't in there.

I don't even know why this is really an arguement anyway. The raiders' starters could have blown out the Niners' starters 35-0 for all I care, there is still no way in hell the raiders are anywhere near the Niners level. PERIOD.
Your full of shit.

FATAL NYGHTMARE said:

So if you really wanna get down to it, your boys only scored 7 points on the Niners starters (I'm being generous with that 7 too, because technically it was scored on the 2nd stringers but they did drive down the field on the first unit).

Cause you say they put in there backup dline? What dline are you talkin about, if it was their second they looked just like the first. The second td was against a mixture of starters and back-ups, so I guess you were a little right.