Nnamdi Asomugha contract voided

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

P.E.

Sicc OG
Feb 24, 2003
1,977
514
113
yea,..namdi is good,..but to be called the best in the league still with a bum foot now is a matter of opinion,...he wasnt putting up numbers last year either let alone this year,..and 16 mill or more for someone who might be injury prone now is a big risk!,...i say we save the money and use it for some fresh talent on somebody who plays just as good and as hard as namdi!...unless he takes a pay cut and restructures his contract,i say fuk it ,let him leave,..and all u saying that cable is a better coach the huey are trippin,...its obvious that hue knows and understands the x's and o's better then cable ever will!...plus cable was just an intern coach,..he wasnt gonna be there long!...hue has disipline,..talks shit to u at practice to make u work harder,..i dont see cable doing that!...hue will be down everyones throats and will demand excellence!....he reminds me kinna like jon gruden,the lil dude that dont play!....i think hue is a better fit a h.c,...as for the namdi thing,..lets just go out and get a good pick a cb,..sum fresh ,cheaper talent !....same game plan next year,...use the namdi money to sign and bring back sum players and yea,..its a wrap,...raiders will have 10+ wins next year!


die hard!!
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
Nnamdi is going to give Al an opportunity to match or beat any offer.

They have a close relationship. He's closer to Al than any player on the team. Nnamdi isn't mad at Al. His biggest issue has been all the losing. Now that the Raiders have turned the corner, he's been adament about wanting to stay long-term.

His contract was bad for the Raiders financially. We only would've had him for 1 more year even if he reached those incentives. For 17 mill??

He could leave and I wouldn't be suprised if he did, but my gut tells me he'll stay with the Raiders.

Time will tell.
 

Quick

Active member
May 6, 2002
6,443
30
48
Yay Area, CA
LMAO @ Nnamdi being the best player in football but then all the sudden, he's not that good because he's on the raiders anymore.

15 million wasnt too much to pay him but now 17 million is? He's worth every penny of that to the raiders....

You Delusionals are comedy.....
 

Rossibreath

triple og from the sbp
Sep 1, 2005
12,968
15,466
113
50
Menasha
LMAO @ Nnamdi being the best player in football but then all the sudden, he's not that good because he's on the raiders anymore.

15 million wasnt too much to pay him but now 17 million is? He's worth every penny of that to the raiders....

You Delusionals are comedy.....
fuck that, they're gonna be better without em. Lol
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
LMAO @ Nnamdi being the best player in football but then all the sudden, he's not that good because he's on the raiders anymore.

15 million wasnt too much to pay him but now 17 million is? He's worth every penny of that to the raiders....

You Delusionals are comedy.....
No nobody is being delusional. 17 million for 1 year of football is a bad look for any team, especially one with as little cap room at the Raiders.

No one is saying Nnamdi isn't that good. He's the best corner in the NFL. We know that. We just need to lock him up long-term. 17 mill for one season is not going to get us another SB ring.

If he ends leaving it'll suck. But you can't keep every player. It's the nature of the business.
 

Quick

Active member
May 6, 2002
6,443
30
48
Yay Area, CA
No nobody is being delusional. 17 million for 1 year of football is a bad look for any team, especially one with as little cap room at the Raiders.

No one is saying Nnamdi isn't that good. He's the best corner in the NFL. We know that. We just need to lock him up long-term. 17 mill for one season is not going to get us another SB ring.

If he ends leaving it'll suck. But you can't keep every player. It's the nature of the business.
Im not saying your the only one but I dont understand why this contract was never a problem to raider fans before. It was signed in 2009 and not a problem until now.

15 million for one player in a capped league is too much unless their Brady or Manning....

Losing your best corner on your team hurts but losing the best corner in the league really hurts. The Raiders are on their way up and this will hurt the teams progress. Losing Woodson wasnt that bad because you guys had a replacement for him. It kinda seems like the Raiders werent preparing themselves for this, like they were with Woodson...


I think that not having that 1st round pick is hurting you guys more then you think. Yes, Seymour is worth it but that #17 pick might have helped to improve the Raiders secondary, since you guys have your 2 starting CB's and safety becoming free agents.....
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
Yeah.. it'll be interesting.. The Raiders wanted a way out of the contract after year 2, that much is certain. One thing about Al is he hardly EVER let's his homerun draft picks get away. Al will probably offer Nnamdi the richest long-term deal ever given to a Corner to get him to stay.
 

Quick

Active member
May 6, 2002
6,443
30
48
Yay Area, CA
Yea, your right. Al already offered him one of the richest contract already, I dont see why he wouldnt do it again. Plus Nnamdi is as important on the field as he is off the field to the raiders....

I honestly dont see him leaving Oakland. Al is too smart to let him just walk away like that......
 

P.E.

Sicc OG
Feb 24, 2003
1,977
514
113
Yea, your right. Al already offered him one of the richest contract already, I dont see why he wouldnt do it again. Plus Nnamdi is as important on the field as he is off the field to the raiders....

I honestly dont see him leaving Oakland. Al is too smart to let him just walk away like that......
LETS HOPE SO!.....
 

corinthian

Just Win Baby!!!
Feb 23, 2006
5,704
1,257
113
43
3rd ID
Yea, your right. Al already offered him one of the richest contract already, I dont see why he wouldnt do it again. Plus Nnamdi is as important on the field as he is off the field to the raiders....

I honestly dont see him leaving Oakland. Al is too smart to let him just walk away like that......
a niner fan not being a complete delusional retard? this is a rarity. you need to school your brethren, most of them have no damn sense in their heads.
 
Apr 26, 2003
10,869
16,113
0
61
East Oakland, USA
I read this in the contra costa times this morning thought he made some interesting points...

Jerry McDonald: Oakland Raiders did the right thing regarding Nnamdi Asomugha's contract


Bear with me a moment, because I'm about to do something that goes against the grain of every right-minded amateur and professional general manager or football expert.

The incentives that voided the contract of Raiders Pro Bowl cornerback Nnamdi Asomugha make complete sense.

Across the e-mail, blog, Twitter and talk radio landscape, crazy ol' Al Davis has been taken to task, and the Raiders vilified, for being so incompetent as to not realize there was language in Asomugha's contract that could set him free after two years.

On the heels of the team dumping coach Tom Cable, much to the chagrin of a large part of the Raiders' roster, Asomugha will -- after a collective bargaining agreement is reached -- be able to field offers from any team willing to write a big enough check for his services.

The Raiders know all about this, because they wrote the book on writing the check. The three-year deal Asomugha signed after the 2008 season for $45.3 million was met with dismay by 31 other teams because the market had been reset impossibly high.

If you want to know why Darrelle Revis didn't show up to training camp with the Jets this year, look no further than the Raiders' deal with Asomugha.

At the time, the Raiders had both Asomugha and Pro Bowl punter Shane Lechler up for free agency. Asomugha had been franchised for $9.8 million in 2008, and Lechler's contract had expired.

The Raiders reeled both in by paying over the going rate. Way over the going rate.

Within Asomugha's deal, unknown until uncovered by ESPN's Adam Schefter on Sunday,

were likely-to-be-earned incentives that would automatically void the deal if not met.

One was playing time, and Asomugha played less in 2010 than he did in 2009 -- missing two games -- because of an ankle injury. The others were performance based. If Asomugha had so much as a single interception, a single sack, a single fumble recovery or a single forced fumble, there would have been no void.

In that case, the Raiders would have to decide whether to pay Asomugha $16.8 million or the average of the top five quarterbacks in the NFL, whichever was higher. In a year when Peyton Manning, Tom Brady and Drew Brees are in line for new contracts.

There's a famous "Seinfield" episode about a television pilot about "nothing."

That's Asomugha in a nutshell.

Because he is so good at covering receivers, Asomugha is the loneliest member of the Raiders defense. Quarterbacks simply don't throw in his direction. He didn't give up a single touchdown pass this season.

That's all well and good, but it's a bottom-line business, and the Raiders still gave up 29 touchdown passes and had 12 interceptions this season. If there's a ripple effect from Asomugha's lockdown skills, it's impossible to detect.

Over the past three seasons, Asomugha has played 45 of 48 games. In those three years, the Raiders gave up 65 touchdown passes and Asomugha had two interceptions. The Raiders were 18-30 overall but 2-1 when Asomugha was out of the lineup.

For that, he was paid $38.3 million.

Asomugha is the Raiders' most thoughtful interview, a team leader, a consummate professional and someone who thinks well beyond football in terms of philanthropic interests. His picture could go next to the word "class" in the dictionary.

When Charles Woodson was with the Raiders, he was known for late nights, sleeping during meetings and letting his prodigious athletic skills make up the difference.

Yet in the two years when Woodson was franchised, pocketing $19.3 million for 19 games (he missed 13 because of injury), he was just as ignored as Asomugha by opposing quarterbacks, managing two interceptions, 2½ sacks, 11 passes defensed and three forced fumbles.

But in those 19 games, Woodson had 103 tackles. Asomugha has 93 tackles and one forced fumble in his past 45 games. He played 14 games this season and had 19 tackles. That's three less than Hiram Eugene, two more than Rock Cartwright.

Woodson was a football player. Asomugha is an able tackler, but he's more of a cover guy. He's a specialist in the way that Lechler, Sebastian Janikowski and long-snapper Jon Condo are the highest-paid specialists in the NFL.

Lechler, Seabass and Condo actually have duties with the football far more often than Asomugha.

Even if the Raiders are at least partially at fault for scheme and not putting Asomugha in position to make enough plays, there is zero justification for paying him in the same ballpark as you would pay Brady, Manning and Brees in terms of yearly salary.

So while the Raiders are being criticized for including a contract void for no statistical production on a $16.8 million (or more) option year, I have a question: Why wouldn't they include one?

The Raiders should do whatever they can to bring back Asomugha, but they should weigh that decision against his contributions to the bottom line, how they'll use him and what the market will bear.

If Asomugha chooses to join Revis with the New York Jets for bigger money or what he believes is a better chance at the Super Bowl, so be it.

As brilliant as Asomugha was at covering receivers in Oakland, it didn't begin to cover for weaknesses elsewhere. He was a luxury on a team not yet good enough to afford one.