NICK DIAZ 1YR SUSPENSION ..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

$ileNt_eNe_ATL

Jefe De Los Pollos
Aug 12, 2005
2,593
2,726
113
37
#1
In a hearing that stretched over three hours and two rooms within the Grant Sawyer Office Building in Las Vegas, the Nevada State Athletic Commission unanimously voted today to suspend Nick Diaz for his failed drug test at UFC 143.

Diaz's suspension runs 12 months from the date of the event, which took place Feb. 4. Additionally, he has been fined $60,000, or 30 percent of his $200,000 show purse.

Diaz, who was present at hearing, must also submit a clean drug test in order to be licensed again in Nevada.

NSAC commissioner Bill Brady suggested the term of suspension as keeping with a previous cases in which a boxer tested positive multiple times for marijuana metabolites. Diaz was suspended and fined by the NSAC in 2007 following a fight with Takanori Gomi at PRIDE 33, which took place at Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas.

Diaz lawyer Ross Goodman was unsuccessful in arguing those metabolites were technically not a violation of commission statutes on the use of prohibited substances, as he stated in a pair of legal responses to the NSAC's initial complaint against the fighter, which was filed Feb. 8.

John Hiatt, a medical expert testifying on Diaz's behalf, said the amount of metabolites found in Diaz's system were consistent with an affidavit from the fighter stating he had ceased marijuana use eight days prior to UFC 143.

But Dr. Timothy Trainor, an expert called by the state, said Diaz could have also used the drug as early as 24 hours before the fight, and Hiatt admitted he was surprised that Diaz's level wasn't higher given his frequency of use.

Diaz testified to using the drug before training, which was later seized upon by commissioners as evidence of possible performance enhancement. The fighter said he only apologized to the commission following his first suspension because "didn't want to be made an example of" and continued using marijuana immediately afterward.

"So the mistake you made is not stopping soon enough?" NSAC chairman Raymond "Skip" Avansino asked the fighter about his most recent suspension.

"Perhaps," Diaz answered.

Despite receiving a doctor's recommendation allowing the use of medical marijuana as treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Diaz said he didn't think he had a serious medical condition.

Commissioners, however, were unconvinced that the fighter was being transparent when he left blank questions about medical conditions and prescription drug use on a pre-fight medical questionnaire for UFC 143. The state produced a similar questionnaire from a January 2011 fight in California in which Diaz noted "THC" as a medication or drug he took within 30 days of the fight.

Goodman argued the fighter was answering the questions to the best of his ability and that the diagnosis was the responsibility of the doctor who issued him a recommendation for medical marijuana.

NSAC commissioner Pat Lundvall noted that Diaz's recommendation was dated several weeks after UFC 143 and drew an admission from Goodman that the fighter wasn't a valid medical marijuana patient in both California and Nevada, as previously stated.

Diaz, meanwhile, said he frequently got marijuana from friends with recommendations and said he'd been using since his early teens.

During testimony before the commission, NSAC Executive Director Keith Kizer stated that Diaz's post-fight drug test at UFC 137, which took place this past October in Las Vegas, came back negative, though it was ruled to be "diluted" or "abnormal." He also noted that Diaz appeared to evade a post-fight test at UFC 143 and tested several hours late – and only under the threat of not receiving his purse.

Goodman countered that Diaz may have been suffering from severe dehydration following the recent fight, but Hiatt could not say for certain how stricken the fighter was.

At the start of deliberations on the suspension, Lundvall said there were too many discrepancies to resolve between Diaz's testimony and the evidence before the commission and recommended a yearlong suspension. Her sentiments were quickly echoed by the remaining commissioners, and a vote to suspend and fine Diaz was passed in short order.

Diaz is eligible to apply for a license in Nevada on Feb. 4, 2013.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,366
6,556
113
42
#3
I hope he fights on Feb. 5th just to shove it there face. lol, all these real cheaters out there and there crying about weed which is damn near legal in CA.
 
Jan 29, 2005
11,573
89,267
113
41
PHX
#6
the NSAC is a corrupt joke.

First, marijuana metabolites ain't even illegal to have in your system in the NSAC's own rule book

Second, it was proven Diaz had quit smoking long before the fight due to the small amount of metabolites in his system, his test even came back NEGATIVE for marijuana.

Third, from the transcripts I was reading of the hearing these scumbags were asking Diaz questions like "Did you graduate High School?", wtf does him graduating High School have to do with this hearing. These people obviously made their decision before the hearing even started and I have a feeling they were salty because Diaz sued them a few weeks back. It's a joke these people swear in people like this is a court of law, yet they don't follow any laws themselves. These are hired people not elected and they have power to fuck with peoples lives based on whatever the fuck they feel like and not any laws. Don't know how this shit is legal.

Plus all this came right after Chael Sonnen was granted the ability to legally roid. The NSAC gave Chael the ability to have his testoterone ratio at 6 to 1 when the normal person is 1 to 1. From what i've read its a million to one chance of someone "naturally" elevating their testosterone to 6 to 1 through training, hell the WADA which is who the Olympics use only allows a 4 to 1 ratio.

So basically with the NSAC roiding is ok if you destroyed your body in the past with steroid abuse, lie about it in the past, get in trouble for it just a year and a half ago, and now you can have 6 times higher testosterone than your opponent. But legally smoking weed weeks earlier is bad....

NSAC's "rules", horrible judges, horrible referees and basically everything these people do is a joke.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#8
Smoking weed = 1 year ban.

Getting busted for steroids or having testoterone ratio 10x the normal range = 6-9 month ban.

Something is seriously wrong here.

And wtf at NSAC OK'ing Sonnen to inject himself twice a week as long as he tests "normal" after the fight, as if he would really want to be peaking off that shit during the fight. smh

and lamont peterson vs khan is cancalled because peterson did the same thing and his ration was 3.77/1 (well under the 6/1 ratio that is allowed in Nevada).
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#9
Smoking weed = 1 year ban.

Getting busted for steroids or having testoterone ratio 10x the normal range = 6-9 month ban.

Something is seriously wrong here.

And wtf at NSAC OK'ing Sonnen to inject himself twice a week as long as he tests "normal" after the fight, as if he would really want to be peaking off that shit during the fight. smh

and lamont peterson vs khan is cancalled because peterson did the same thing and his ration was 3.77/1 (well under the 6/1 ratio that is allowed in Nevada).
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#10
Smoking weed = 1 year ban.

Getting busted for steroids or having testoterone ratio 10x the normal range = 6-9 month ban.

Something is seriously wrong here.

And wtf at NSAC OK'ing Sonnen to inject himself twice a week as long as he tests "normal" after the fight, as if he would really want to be peaking off that shit during the fight. smh

and lamont peterson vs khan is cancalled because peterson did the same thing and his ration was 3.77/1 (well under the 6/1 ratio that is allowed in Nevada).
 
Dec 30, 2003
4,215
120
0
38
#11
Smoking weed = 1 year ban.

Getting busted for steroids or having testoterone ratio 10x the normal range = 6-9 month ban.

Something is seriously wrong here.

And wtf at NSAC OK'ing Sonnen to inject himself twice a week as long as he tests "normal" after the fight, as if he would really want to be peaking off that shit during the fight. smh

and lamont peterson vs khan is cancalled because peterson did the same thing and his ration was 3.77/1 (well under the 6/1 ratio that is allowed in Nevada).
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
#12
Smoking weed = 1 year ban.

Getting busted for steroids or having testoterone ratio 10x the normal range = 6-9 month ban.

Something is seriously wrong here.

And wtf at NSAC OK'ing Sonnen to inject himself twice a week as long as he tests "normal" after the fight, as if he would really want to be peaking off that shit during the fight. smh

and lamont peterson vs khan is cancalled because peterson did the same thing and his ration was 3.77/1 (well under the 6/1 ratio that is allowed in Nevada).
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,356
13,837
113
38
#13
Smoking weed = 1 year ban.

Getting busted for steroids or having testoterone ratio 10x the normal range = 6-9 month ban.

Something is seriously wrong here.

And wtf at NSAC OK'ing Sonnen to inject himself twice a week as long as he tests "normal" after the fight, as if he would really want to be peaking off that shit during the fight. smh

and lamont peterson vs khan is cancalled because peterson did the same thing and his ration was 3.77/1 (well under the 6/1 ratio that is allowed in Nevada).
 
Jan 29, 2005
11,573
89,267
113
41
PHX
#14
Nick Diaz and Legal Team Strongly Considering Challenging NSAC In Court

http://www.mmafighting.com/ufc/2012...iaz-legal-team-appealing-nsac-ruling-mma-news

May 22, 2012 - Despite a stinging rebuke at the hands of the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) on Monday, Nick Diaz and his legal team have not given up the fight to secure the fighter a license.

Diaz's lawyer Ross Goodman believes the commission acted in disregard for established and unequivocal Nevada statutory code at Monday's hearing. After being contacted by MMA Fighting, Goodman says Diaz and his legal advisors are strongly considering petitioning a district court to review the NSAC's decision.

Should they choose to move forward, "we would file a petition for judicial review in front of a district court judge," Goodman told MMA Fighting. "It would entitle a judge to basically look at the hearing anew."

Judicial review is a process by which if one requires an occupational license from the state and are denied such authorization by the relevant state agency, the petitioner can ask relevant courts to weigh assess the merits of the petitioner's claims. This method can be used in cases where the petitioner believes the state agency broke the law, acted unfairly or made a decision not based on facts.

In addition to the review, Goodman contends they could also motion the judge for a stay the suspension while he or she deliberates the larger merits of the petition.

Diaz tested positive for marijuana metabolites following his loss to Carlos Condit at UFC 143 in February of 2012. For the infraction, the NSAC suspended Diaz at a hearing Monday in Las Vegas for one year effective from the date of his last fight and fined him 30 percent of his purse, or approximately $60,000. Diaz must also pass a drug test when reapplying to earn a license.

While Goodman objected to several questions asked and conclusions reached by the NSAC, Diaz's legal case primarily rests on whether marijuana metabolites are banned substances in the state of Nevada.

Goodman argued both Monday and in documents related to Diaz's previous lawsuit against the NSAC that marijuana metabolites are not a prohibited substance in the state.

Marijuana is prohibited for fighters licensed in Nevada by virtue of NAC 467.850(2)(f), which incorporates all prohibited substances on the current Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). However, Goodman argues marijuana is only prohibited "in competition". Goodman maintains WADA permits use of marijuana and other cannabinoids outside of competition and per the construction of Nevada's stated regulations, in that state as well.

Goodman suggested Monday marijuana metabolites are not grounds to find Diaz guilty of violating the law. Given the outcome of the hearing, however, it appeared unpersuasive to the commission.

"It was clear by their questioning that their decision was already made up," Goodman said. "In my closing argument I basically reminded 'Skip' Avansino, who is the chairman [of the NSAC], that in the TUE hearing that occurred before us [with UFC middleweight Chael Sonnen] he said 'the presence of a prohibited substance would constitute a violation'. Those were his words. The chairman of the commission."

"All you have to do is look at the ruling and tell me where it says that Nick tested for the presence of marijuana. Because he didn't. And if you're saying 'the presence of a prohibited substance would constitute a violation' then you have to show me where in the rules marijuana metabolite is a prohibited substance."

"They never answered that," Goodman continued. "They never responded to that. They just made up a rule. They read the rule in there. It was like on an ad hoc basis."

"[Avansino] agreed with what our whole position is: that evidence of prior use of a prohibited substance is not presence of a prohibited substance. Everyone acknowledges that marijuana metabolites means that at some point before that you used marijuana, but evidence of prior use is not a violation. You have to show presence of prohibited substance according to Nevada rules to constitute a violation. That was never addressed. That was never responded to. That was never clarified."

"Effectively what they did," Goodman concluded, "was punish him for legally consuming marijuana more than a week before the fight and then having an inactive component sequestered in his fat tissue after the fight."

Goodman also expressed surprise at what he perceived as the lack of basic literacy among the commissioners on Nevada's own regulations as it related to banned substances. Early in the hearing, commissioner Pat Lundvall appeared confused regarding what Nevada's laws and those of WADA did and did not say.

"It was clear that the commissioners didn't really prepare for the hearing," Goodman maintained. "It was really alarming, the fact that something so basic, so clear, which is that marijuana in general is allowed out of competition but not in competition. To kick off the hearing suggesting there is no distinction indicated what was to come after that."

Goodman argues Nevada borrowing WADA's Prohibited List of banned substances to help the commission regulate drugs of abuse is a key first step to regulating banned substances. If they really wish to regulate metabolites, however, then Goodman recommends they also adopt WADA's Code.

"If they felt so strongly about the issue, then they should have amended the rule or modified the rule in the future to incorporate and adopt WADA's code which does constitute a violation if you have any metabolite in your system. Because the rule says any prohibited substance, it's markers or metabolites present in your sample. That's what WADA's Code says, which is something Nevada has not adopted. There's no counterpart rule in Nevada. There's nothing in the rule that says metabolites are a prohibited substance."

Goodman was also dismayed at what he felt was a line of irrelevant questioning among the commissioners that attempted to portray Diaz's use of marijuana as recreational or performance enhancing. On the latter charge, Goodman notes the separation of competition testing as a refutation of the commission's argument.

"You heard him testify. That's what happens when you have ADHD: you can't focus. They tried to construe that as 'oh, that must be performance enhancing'. That is absurd. There was nothing more ridiculous than that statement."

"Instead of performance enhancing, it's more life enhancing for Nick. It helps him out. It helps him deal with attention deficit disorder. Of course, WADA has already determined that which Nevada adopts: that marijuana is not performance enhancing because it separates it between in and out of competition. Well, they don't do that for other performance enhancing drugs in WADA."

As for Diaz's attitude after repudiation, Goodman contends Diaz is still ready continue his MMA career. "Nick was disappointed obviously, but he's in good spirits. He's in good spirits in general. He knows the truth of it. He knows he didn't lie to the commission. He knows he didn't mislead the commission and he understands he did everything he was told to do legally. He got a physician's statement, he was qualified to use it, he understands the rules do not require metabolites as a violation."

And is the former Strikeforce welterweight champion still un-retired as he stated when previously filing a lawsuit?

"Nick's sworn in his affidavit he's not retired. He's only 28 years old, he's at the top of his game. I don't want to speak for Nick, but I think he's looking forward to getting back in the cage as soon as he can."
 
Oct 23, 2006
938
66
0
39
#16
Seems to me that Nick Diaz is having his health compromised by the athletic commssion. Punishing him for taking medicine for a condition that they probably know nothing about.
 
Oct 27, 2008
2,001
36
0
38
#17
its cool though. sonnen can abuse trt & get a rematch against the GOAT, but god forbid nick have a little fun with some maryjewanna. condit is nothing more than a runner who would rather wait for gsp to heal up than defend the interim title he earned by not standing toe to toe with a man he thought would dismantle him if he did so.