Talus said:
@HERESY
i dont got that much time...but i one of my points was just this "AU"
Or american union ...pfft America IS a union..hence the UNITED part in UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...
just pointing out what should be friggin obvious maybe you should study up before you speak.
You don't make any sense. I have time, and I 'll actually tell you why you don't make sense. First off, no one has implied that america is
not a union.
ALL of the states within america are bound by the
constitution and the
supreme court. Yes, states can operate on an independent level, but the control and independence the individual states have is limited. Can California sign a nuclear treaty with Russia? No. Can Florida sign a trade deal with Iraq? No. Now compare that to the countires that comprise the EU. Can Britain go to war when they want? Yes. Can Germany sign a trade deal with China if it chooses? Yes. Do you not see the difference? The united states is DIFFERENT from the EU, but a NORTH AMERICAN UNION would be very similar to the EU.
Second of all, no one said anything about an american union. We are talking about a PAN AMERICAN/NORTH AMERICAN UNION. The members of this union are the countries that comprise
NORTH AMERICA. Next time use the correct terminology.
Now, here is why I said you don't make any sense:
what purpose will it serve to create a union between mexico and canada? And this american thing AH LA european union...uhm was it not in america with these 13 original colonies created a Union?
1. If you had hit the links provided you would know the purpose of creating a union between the three countries.
2. Comparing The EU to the Thirteen Colonies is like comparing apples to oranges. Europe is a
continent, but america is
NOT. The members of the EU are
COUNTRIES that still operate with a vast amount of independence. Do similarities exist between the EU and the united states? Yes, but these similarities are minimal.
these SUGGESTIONS by cfr are well and good but they seem to be only that and it only points and hints that the presidents agree on their plan.
These are not "SUGGESTIONS" made by the CFR, and I seriously doubt you knew what the CFR was before you read this thread. If you knew anything about the organization you wouldn't have said that. In addition, the presidents of all three countries involved have already
signed on the dotted line. So much for only hinting at an agreement.
http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Mar/23-209281.html
it seems more like they agree on what is needed with the tri-country relations not exactly that they want this super america type thing......just throwin some stuff out there
Read this link again.
http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Mar/23-209281.html