Messy Marv- Bandanas.......sound quality comment

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 4, 2002
1,488
2
0
42
#1
Is it me or is the sound quality off. The shit is DOPE reguardless but the sound seems like it wasnt all the way mastered or some other can of enginering terminology that i cant explain.
 

GHP

Sicc OG
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
853
113
46
#5
Both of them sounded good to me, Disobayish is probably one of the best engineered albums Ive heard from the bay and his latest was pretty good too.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
#7
my Disobayish sounds good exept for the bass.on every track you gotta put the bass up almost to the limit to even hear the bass.i would return it for a new one but i bought it when it first dropped so im fucked............
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#8
If you want to hear a bad mix job listen to the game is thick 2 or american pimp. If you want to hear a major release bad mix job listen to the games cd (seriously) or cypress hills last release.


I havent heard the work in question (marvs album) so I cant comment. Besides the bass was anything else off? Did parts become muffled? Were parts panned wrong (snare to the left for example)? Did any phase cancellation occur? any digital distortion or transients sneak through? Do tell.
 
Feb 23, 2003
5,461
48
0
44
#9
THE WORST MIXED ALBUM EVER WAS LUNI COLEONE.COM THAT ALBUM HAD NO BUMP WHAT SO EVER!!! MESSY'S NEW ALBUM WAS NOT WORTH MY 18.97 SO I BROUGHT IT BACK AND 14.00 IN STORE CREDIT SO... DISOBAYISH WAS GOOD BUT YALL RIGHT THEIR WAS NO HEAVY BASSLINES IN THAT ALBUM EITHER..
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,979
10
38
42
#10
that aint nowhere near as bad as the san quinn "i give you my word". that album was one of the most highly anticipated bay releases of 2004. and when it FINALLY dropped, the whole album sound was off.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,600
23
38
SF
#11
I'm no producer or anything, so I'm wondering how you define a "bad mix job"? for example on the mac dre album and san quinn album, what is bad about it
 

Rasan

Producer
May 17, 2002
19,730
24,634
113
45
Chula Vista, South Bay, San Diego, California
#13
PressPlay Prod. said:
well mainly its the engineer who does the mixing, and who are the ones with good ear training, with me learning about eq and compression i can tell what sounds good and sounds bad ((mix wise)). ok for example

Mac DRe "Game is thick part 2" the 2nd song called "get loud" cant really describe the sound, but the vocals sounded hella louder then the beat. then on that "stool pegion" song, it sounded relatively low and some parts was distorted. there was a few other songs on this album which i didnt like the mixes on but cant really remember them off the back of my mind, gotta listen to it again. but overall it was a good as album.

on that san quinn cd "i give u my word" i think it was only 1 song that sounded hella off to me and that was "Real playas" feat willie hen, it just didnt sound well mixed to me.
man, i just can't describe it on the quinn..but it just sounded flat to me with no bump watsoever...yes i make music! lol. i hope i don't sound retarded
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#14
@Krishna The album in your avatar is an example of a bad mix job. I'm a ATL fan (Black mafia life is a top ten rap album classic IMHO) but that 187um solo was not on par.


Bad mix job? bassline and kick fighting each other. Vocals too low or too high in the song. Ad-lib/background tracks too high or too low. Too much compression (squashing all dynamics) or no compression on vocals or instruments. Without getting too technical you use compression (or limiting) to level the tracks out. Insane use of reverb/delay (these effects should be used so you can BARELY hear them) wrong panning (like panning a pianos high end to the left or panning a kick drum to the right), phase cancellation (listen to a track in stereo and listen in mono sound different?), distortion in the tracks (you'll know it when you hear it), improper use of eq (boosting the wrong frequencies, not cutting the right ones) and 60 cycle hum in the tracks.


Digital distortion and bass distortion are two different things. You can have bass distortion (too much bass especially in the 20hz-110hz range and mud in the 300-500hz range) but no digital distortion. You record too high (over 0 db in the digital realm) and you get digital distortion. You clip the master buss........well.....you get digital distortion.


You have 4 stages:

1. Performence/arrangement

2. tracking/recording

3. mixing

4. mastering


If you mess up in stage 1 it will ruin 2, 3 and 4. If you mess up in stage 2, it will ruin 3 and 4. You mess up in stage 3 stage 4 will be ruined. You have to do each one CORRECTLY when you have the chance. I find a lot of problems come from stage 2. People simply don't track correctly (unity gain/gain staging) and if its not recorded properly it's very hard to mix it. If a track has 60 cycle hum/ line noise you have to take the time to use a gate or some other plugin to reduce the artifacts.



All of this probably wont make sense to you but to some of the people reading this it will. I don't listen to music from a consumer standpoint. Everytime I hear something I'm listening from an engineers standpoint and thats something I can't change. Heres an example. Have you heard the westside connection "terrorist threats" album? Listen to the the terrorist threat song and after that listen to gangsta nation or the first song on the album. Do you hear a difference? The song sounds muffled (they could have WANTED it to sound that way) but I wouldn't have done that. Listen to the games album. Listen to the song before the one eminem did and listen to the one after eminem. What do you hear?



Now I admit NO album is 100% PERFECT (not even dr dre's chronic it had too much reverb for my taste) but some things should NOT be accepted. I had to mix some songs recently that had digital distortion (not recorded at my spot) and I had the artist go back in and re-record the tracks. I had stuff that was sent to me that had 60 cycle hum and too low. I had the producer re record the tracks.


Solution? Work with people who know what to do and when to do it.
 
Jul 12, 2002
3,211
8,717
113
40
#15
PressPlay Prod. said:
on that san quinn cd "i give u my word" i think it was only 1 song that sounded hella off to me and that was "Real playas" feat willie hen, it just didnt sound well mixed to me.
The mix job on those vocals were atrocious. Willie Hen's voice was probably around 6dB higher than San Quinn's. Also Henn's vocals are panned slightly more to the right.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,229
2,453
113
#17
Mac Dre's albums from after "Heart Of A Gangsta..." and before "Deganomics/Genie Of The Lamp" were badly mixed.Mac Dre Is The Name had maybe 1 good mixed song "Doing What I Do",Thizzelle Washington pretty much was all off but maybe a few tracks ."C.U.T.T.H.O.A.T." was a sick as song but was mixed like shit.........


Yukmouths Godzilla had a couple bad mixes too.there should have been a couple re-takes on some vocals too,ya'l notice on "Pimp Da Bitch" he say "Vegas,Hawaii,Washington D She".........



it seems nowadays with new technology,it should be easier and cheaper to make some quality music,its like cats get to rushin shit and dont go over shit.........
 
Jul 12, 2002
3,211
8,717
113
40
#18
i was estimating the 6db difference. In a class I took we learned that a 3db raise is barely louder to the ear, and a 10dB raise sounds like the volume doubled to the ear. But a 6dB raise is actually technically doubles it, but the ear can't tell it is doubled or something. Does this sound right to you Heresey? It is bad if you hear this song, any untrained ear would notice
 
Jul 12, 2002
3,211
8,717
113
40
#20
Oh ya i forgot to mention that Big Hollis compilation called We From Tha LBC. That sounded fucking horrible!!! Has anybody else that heard that shit agree with me?