This is a good discussion for the board, not an argument
threefoe said:
^^^Your mentality is exactly why the Bay aint where it needs to be. I dont give a shit if nobody is affiliated in the Bay. That dont mean you cant shot someone out. No matter what you say everybody wants where they from to be big and the only way thats gonna happen is if Bay artist keep makin good music, give props, and support each other. If you dont see that trend in the game right now, you aint payin attention at all.
When Usher was really starting to blow a couple of albums back, you didn't hear him shouting out Lil Jon or Ludacris or nothin. But Lil Jon and Luda get hot, guess what? Usher, Lil Jon and Ludacris get together and make a hit. But you didn't hear Usher shouting out his Atlanta comrads until they were in the industry themselves. It wasn't Usher's responsibility to do so.
The Bay aint where it needs to be because we don't have any hit records coming out of here. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with my "mentality" (whatever that may be). I understand where you're coming from but you're naive to think that everybody wants where they are from to be big. It's like you're basing your whole "mentality" on what Atlanta artists are doing right now. Everywhere aint like Atlanta. Some cats want to be the only thing from their area to be big and could give a fuck about everybody else. I kinda see this "trend" you're talking about, but again it don't work like that everywhere. Following trends as opposed to setting them is not the way to go. Just because Atlanta and a lot of the South is unified don't mean that kind of thing would work in the Bay. I can't help out another artist if I aint even in a position to help myself. I could go on for days about this. Some people get my point.
threefoe said:
And cuzzo I have two Degrees in Entertainment Marketing and Management and have worked with a prominent figure in the music biz so I think I understand the business very well.
That's good for you dawg. I've been producing music for almost 10 years and I've worked with a few prominent figures in the biz. Does that mean either of our points of view are more valid than the other? Nope. It just means that we both believe in our point of view. I'm just trying to get the point across that this aint an argument. It's a good discussion.
threefoe said:
... theres no excuse for not saying at least one group/person. Especially when the person who asked the question was from NY.
Basically she was in a position where she COULD have said something. Not where she SHOULD have said something. Saying she SHOULD have said something implies that it was her duty/responsibility to do so. Which it isn't.