Bush Atempting to Pardon Himself from Future War Crime Indictments

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

V

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
5,308
137
0
41
#4
  • V

    V

the sad part is, this shit will get passed and the media will never mention it again...
 
Mar 13, 2003
5,303
606
113
#15
I agree with Lamberto and Ville31...........And some ppl want to deny(or refuse to see) that the government is corrupt...psssh
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
40
#16
Hyfeeboy said:
just googled and found this http://www.abovepolitics.com/forum/thread304439/pg1 ... it was a bill from last year and it was already passed.
I thought it was because the talk between them seemed old since the dems already got control of the house and senate. And they were talking like if the Dems got control of the house in November, they wouldn't allow it to go through.
 
Apr 13, 2005
834
0
0
#18
Provisions

The Act changes pre-existing law to explicitly forbid the invocation of the Geneva Conventions when executing the writ of habeas corpus or in other civil actions [Act sec. 5(a)]. This provision applies to all cases pending at the time the Act is enacted, as well as to all such future cases.
If the government chooses to bring a prosecution against the detainee, a military commission is convened for this purpose. The following rules are some of those established for trying alien unlawful enemy combatants.
‘‘(b) NOTICE TO ACCUSED.—Upon the swearing of the charges and specifications in accordance with subsection (a), the accused shall be informed of the charges against him as soon as practicable.
  • A civilian defense attorney may not be used unless the attorney has been determined to be eligible for access to classified information that is classified at the level Secret or higher. [10 U.S.C. sec. 949c(b)(3)(D)]
  • A finding of Guilty by a particular commission requires only a two-thirds majority of the members of the commission present at the time the vote is taken [10 U.S.C. sec. 949m(a)]
  • In General- No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [Act sec. 5(a)]
  • As provided by the Constitution and by this section, the President has the authority for the United States to interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions and to promulgate higher standards and administrative regulations for violations of treaty obligations which are not grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions. [Act sec. 6(a)(3)(A)]
  • No person may, without his consent, be tried by a military commission under this chapter a second time for the same offense. [10 U.S.C. sec. 949h(a)].
The Act also contains provisions (often referred to as the "habeas provisions") removing access to the courts for any alien detained by the United States government who is determined to be an enemy combatant, or who is 'awaiting determination' regarding enemy combatant status. This allows the United States government to detain such aliens indefinitely without prosecuting them in any manner.
These provisions are as follows:[5]
(e)(1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. (2) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C. 801 note), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any other action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.
Military Commissions Act of 2006

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006
 

WXS STOMP3R

SENIOR GANG MEMBER
Feb 27, 2006
6,313
1,455
113
49
#19
Robby2Slobby said:
I thought it was because the talk between them seemed old since the dems already got control of the house and senate. And they were talking like if the Dems got control of the house in November, they wouldn't allow it to go through.

DEMOCRATS TO SCARED TO DO ANYTHING...OR ELSE WE WOULDNT BE IN THIS POSITION TO BEGIN WITH...