Bin Laden Didn't Blow Up the Towers, It Was...
- Thread starter carl winslow
- Start date
the guy who built the fucking thing.. yes.. tell me exactly how that can go both ways??? your willing to believe that the buildings could come down due to fire for the first time in history, but you wont believe the person who actually built them saying they could have withstood multiple hits?? wow.
exactly, FOR ALL WE KNOW is correct. you think the government tells us everything they know? do you really think this country is ran by honest people? i wasnt placing blame on whoever i wanted i was placing blame on bush. oh but thats stupid? cuz bush is such a great man, right? bish has dont a whole lot for this country right? put the textbook down and read between the lines, your just another product of the school system and how it tries to convince the youth that we dont live under the rules and laws of mob bosses who live in a big white house in washington DC. bottom line fuck the government.
ps. yes i was high then and yes im high now and yes i'll be high when i wake up in the muthafuckin morning. how can anyone Not be high on the siccness, reading this garbage
ps. yes i was high then and yes im high now and yes i'll be high when i wake up in the muthafuckin morning. how can anyone Not be high on the siccness, reading this garbage
lol at some of this shit, i tryed to tell my buddy that a 747 did not hit the pentagon, and he got all butt hurt and then procedded to tell me GWbush was the greatest president that ever lived. i asked him to show any proof that a plane hit that building, includeing, bodys, engines (bc planes dont just disappear and theres always more then one engine) left over wreakage of an air plane that makes such a small hole in a confinded space. he could do none of the above. but hey at lest GW bush led him to the light LMFAO
youre being presented with logical evidence after another, and you have yet to respond with any concrete evidence to back up your claim except basically just saying "nope". its weird that youre so bent on your beliefs considering it hasnt been implanted in you by the media, since you claim you dont watch the news. so where do you get your info from? is it just intuition that the government wouldnt/couldnt do such a thing?
and big ups to troll for all that info...you get conspiracy prover mvp for this one
and big ups to troll for all that info...you get conspiracy prover mvp for this one
This isn't a 747 but................. kinda makes you rethink what you wrote.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWm5rU7oVn4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWm5rU7oVn4
TROLL said:
^^
well if the plane totally disinigrated into itty bitty pieces, how was it able to still damage the other inner walls of the pentagon? and that video shows a nuke reactor wall, notice not even a hole was punched into it, however the pentagon did have a hole.
well if the plane totally disinigrated into itty bitty pieces, how was it able to still damage the other inner walls of the pentagon? and that video shows a nuke reactor wall, notice not even a hole was punched into it, however the pentagon did have a hole.
The plane in the video was QUITE a bit smaller than a jetliner and the reactor wall (from all appearances) seems to be thicker than the pentagon wall. I dunno, those are probably a couple of factors.
TROLL said:
kool 
.. so then technically if the plane was BIGGER then the one in the video, and the pentagon wall was THINNER then the reactor wall.. shouldnt there be debris??
.. so then technically if the plane was BIGGER then the one in the video, and the pentagon wall was THINNER then the reactor wall.. shouldnt there be debris??
I guess I don't know much, LOL.