9/11

[Sydal]

i'm curious. CNI, was your reference to our president as 'osama' a typo or intentional?

It was probably intentional. Our president is an ass hat, just like the last one. Only difference is, our president thinks we want to see his ass on T.V. every couple of days. Either he's arrogant and thinks we all want to see him, so he does all these televised conferences. OR, he thinks his speaking skills are going to change the minds of everybody that doesn't agree with him. A lot of people believe he is trying to take complete control of this country...so they do things like call him "OSAMA"...Socialist...etc. etc. I wouldn't do that, but I can't say that I blame them either.

Either way, he's an ass hat. Just my opinion though.

 

[Fucky McFuckerson]

This thread is so 2001.

 

[CNI]

i'm curious. CNI, was your reference to our president as 'osama' a typo or intentional?

100% intentional.

 

[CNI]

This thread is so 2001.

Your rights that have been trampled upon since then are so 2009.

 

[CNI]

Sydal - You`re right pimp, we have no business in Iraq. The blood we have shed in that country will come back to haunt our children and grandchildren. Not something I`m proud of.

With many of my takes on the subject, I`ll admit, it leans heavy toward the "conspiracy theorist" side. I like to look at it as being more of a skeptic and realist than anything. So far, we have a history of abuses by our own government. By all of those lies, compiled with far too many coincidences of the events on 9/11, I find it too hard to believe anything they say. Unless they grant a new, independent investigation, untampered, then could I feel more assured of a final outcome. Until then, I have far too many doubts about their claims.

I also find it interesting that most of their claims are now coming out to refute the claims of the "conspiracy" arguments. That seems a little suspect to me as well. These claims to prove the "conspiracies" wrong, very well could be matter of facts. Regardless, my stance will not waver until they grant a new independent investigation to prove that one side was right. Until then, all I can see is one side throwing stones at the other. I just want the facts. If it should prove our government had prior knowledge, or even worse, took part in the events, then I want a full revolutionary takeover with the public bloodshed of those involved.

 

[Sydal]

Sydal - You`re right pimp, we have no business in Iraq. The blood we have shed in that country will come back to haunt our children and grandchildren. Not something I`m proud of.

With many of my takes on the subject, I`ll admit, it leans heavy toward the "conspiracy theorist" side. I like to look at it as being more of a skeptic and realist than anything. So far, we have a history of abuses by our own government. By all of those lies, compiled with far too many coincidences of the events on 9/11, I find it too hard to believe anything they say. Unless they grant a new, independent investigation, untampered, then could I feel more assured of a final outcome. Until then, I have far too many doubts about their claims.

I also find it interesting that most of their claims are now coming out to refute the claims of the "conspiracy" arguments. That seems a little suspect to me as well. These claims to prove the "conspiracies" wrong, very well could be matter of facts. Regardless, my stance will not waver until they grant a new independent investigation to prove that one side was right. Until then, all I can see is one side throwing stones at the other. I just want the facts. If it should prove our government had prior knowledge, or even worse, took part in the events, then I want a full revolutionary takeover with the public bloodshed of those involved.

I feel you, and I have nothing but respect for you. You stand your ground, and you do your research before you debate...which gives you a strong leg to stand on from the door. So props to you.

 

[ColdBlooded]

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1920944