Why is it ok to be a "criminal"?

[The Anti-Vidual]

Because 97% of the people on here want to play the roll of a gangsta.

That's only because GTA San Andreas is getting old.

 

[autistic]

you are not a smart person

yes i is.

 

[Ironic Commando]

What does that have to do with innocent victims of "criminal" activity though?

Why is there ALWAYS an excuse for the "bad guy" around here?

im not talking about people actually do crimes...im talking about those "innocent victims" accused of crimes...or are harassed by cops for living in high crime areas. im saying...a lot of so called "criminal" you hear about or perceive to be criminals as you walk by them have never even been in a crime

 

[MrPeete]

im not talking about people actually do crimes...im talking about those "innocent victims" accused of crimes...or are harassed by cops for living in high crime areas. im saying...a lot of so called "criminal" you hear about or perceive to be criminals as you walk by them have never even been in a crime

Ok, well, your spin is subject for another thread then.

 

[Ironic Commando]

its not a spin...you just have a superficial understanding of poor people and poor envirnments

 

[Ironic Commando]

i also dont think you know what "snitching" is

 

[MrPeete]

its not a spin...

It is a spin because the inspiration for the thread has nothing to do with economics. You don't address the topic, you're trying to hijack.

you just have a superficial understanding of poor people and poor envirnments

When you assume ... :cheeky:

 

[MrPeete]

i also dont think you know what "snitching" is

It's funny you say that...

99% of the population of this site have no idea what "snitching" really is ... :lick:

That is, if there is such a thing...

 

[MrPeete]

Let's not turn this into another "snitch" debate though. That's not what this thread is about.

 

[Ironic Commando]

think outside the box...im not talking about econ.

 

[MrPeete]

think outside the box...im not talking about econ.

You're also not talkin about what I'm talkin about :eyecross:

 

[Ironic Commando]

im questioning your notions of who these supposed criminals are. because everyone commits or have committed a crime intentionally

 

[MrPeete]

All the info you need is right there (pretty clear) in the first post.

 

[Ironic Commando]

and my response to that is...we have all commited crimes intentionally....so who are these criminals you sppeak of

 

[MrPeete]

and my response to that is...we have all commited crimes intentionally....so who are these criminals you sppeak of

And my response to that would be .. Show me the topics on siccness.net where there are ongoing discussions started by all of us about the intentional crimes that we ALL have committed.

After you do that, show me the topics on siccness.net where there are ongoing discussions about general "criminal"/unlawful/bad guy, etc... activity (that doesn't involve ALL of us) and break down the ratio of posters that go to bat for "criminals" vs the ones that go to bat for victims

 

[MOESES SOULRIGHT THE 2nd]

this what i always say

i'm not impressed by gangsters...i dont feel i have to surround myself with tough guys to be okay in life
i'm much more impressed by good people...and i do feel i have to surround myself with good people to be okay in life

that's the difference between being a man and a child

 

[MEXCOM]

because to certin people...no matter what you do...you are a criminal in the eyes of people who pass legislation. if you've hopped the boarder...to them...you are crack smoking...drunk diving murdering rapists...no matter who you are or you life accomplishments. so if they are not for you...why be for them?

So...if you're not a criminal or a bad person in general you should become one just because the ruling echelon of the United States unfairly and erroneously categorizes you as being one? Wouldn't that then make their assertions correct?

 

[Ironic Commando]

And my response to that would be .. Show me the topics on siccness.net where there are ongoing discussions started by all of us about the intentional crimes that we ALL have committed.

After you do that, show me the topics on siccness.net where there are ongoing discussions about general "criminal"/unlawful/bad guy, etc... activity (that doesn't involve ALL of us) and break down the ratio of posters that go to bat for "criminals" vs the ones that go to bat for victims

im not a regular poster on the siccness...so i dont know what you all discuss. but there is a reality off of the siccness called real life....real experiences. i draw my state of mind from those. i will not have any part finding and scanning through hundreds of old posts from the many years siccness.net existed. so i wont participate in that bottomless pit you call a strawman argument.


by your logic...all criminals are people who intentionally commit crimes

that means


if you ever smoked weed...you are a criminal
if you've ever had alchol before you were 21...you are a criminal
drivin with a suspended licence or expired tags...you are a criminal
file sharing...you are a criminal


so on....

if you believe in the law...the law states there is no such thing as a victimless crime...therefore...you've intentionally victimized someone when committing crimes


so i ask you again...who are these criminals you speak of?

 

[MrPeete]

im not a regular poster on the siccness...so i dont know what you all discuss. but there is a reality off of the siccness called real life....real experiences. i draw my state of mind from those. i will not have any part finding and scanning through hundreds of old posts from the many years siccness.net existed. so i wont participate in that bottomless pit you call a strawman argument.


by your logic...all criminals are people who intentionally commit crimes

that means


if you ever smoked weed...you are a criminal
if you've ever had alchol before you were 21...you are a criminal
drivin with a suspended licence or expired tags...you are a criminal
file sharing...you are a criminal


so on....

if you believe in the law...the law states there is no such thing as a victimless crime...therefore...you've intentionally victimized someone when committing crimes


so i ask you again...who are these criminals you speak of?

lol... Sounds like you're looking to circumvent the actual topic with a semantics debate.

I wasn't actually asking you to datamine siccness.net to actually come up with some numbers, lol

If you're not a frequent poster, then you might not have an idea as to what I'm talking about and/or where I'm coming from here so you might as well move on. Unless you want to scan through zillions of siccness.net posts, :knockout:

 

[:ab:]

Don't feed the sheep