Whos Your Top 5 Wide Recievers Of All Time?
- Thread starter Chree
- Start date
hahaha u need to maintain some dignity homie!! Dog its not just about numbers solely!! Brown was a slow ass possession receiver who was good but not a allpro. He had longevitity so his numbers look good!! He cant fuck with irvin! Besides Rice, Irvin was the next best receiver in the game for years and was a perrenial allpro!!! He sometims dominated games!! His career was shortened due to a neck injury!! Trust me Irvin is a top 5 wideout and he was a much better talent than Brown!! If u disagree thats fine but u mistaken!! And chreep I wont even bother with u cause u dont know much! Atleast soli has some knowledge of the game!! Got Em!!
He slowed down in his later years. But half of his career not only was he a WR but he also returned punts and kickoffs and when he did was one of the best in the league. And what are you talking about not all pro? Brown is a 7 time all pro, 9 time pro bowler, former heisman winner, 1990's all decade team. The numbers speak for themselves.
YOU DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY IDEA WHO TIM BROWN WAS BESIDES THE GUY WHO PLAYED WITH THE RAIDERS IN 2000, 2001 AND 2002, DO YOU?
TIM BROWN WAS A PUNT RETURNER FOR HIS FIRST SEVERAL YEARS AND LED THE LEAGUE IN RETURN AVERAGES FOR CONSECUTIVE SEASONS. HE WAS BLAZINGLY FAST COMING OUT OF NOTRE DAME AS A ROOKIE. TIM BROWN WAS A "PERENNIAL ALL-PRO" WHO CONSITANTLY DOMINATED GAMES. HE BECAME A POSSESSION RECEIVER BECAUSE HE PLAYED SO LONG THAT HIS AGE SLOWED HIM DOWN BUT HE STILL WAS A PLAY-MAKER AND GAME CHANGER EVEN INTO HIS LATER YEARS.
MICHAEL IRVIN'S CAREER WAS SHORTENED BECAUSE HE WAS A COKE-HEAD.
TIM BROWN> TO MICHAEL IRVIN ANY DAY. TRUST ME. TIM BROWN WAS A MUCH BETTER TALENT THAN IRVIN. ONLY REASON MICHAEL IS IN THE HOF ALLREADY IS BECAUSE HE PLAYED FOR A DYNASTY.
TIM BROWN WAS A PUNT RETURNER FOR HIS FIRST SEVERAL YEARS AND LED THE LEAGUE IN RETURN AVERAGES FOR CONSECUTIVE SEASONS. HE WAS BLAZINGLY FAST COMING OUT OF NOTRE DAME AS A ROOKIE. TIM BROWN WAS A "PERENNIAL ALL-PRO" WHO CONSITANTLY DOMINATED GAMES. HE BECAME A POSSESSION RECEIVER BECAUSE HE PLAYED SO LONG THAT HIS AGE SLOWED HIM DOWN BUT HE STILL WAS A PLAY-MAKER AND GAME CHANGER EVEN INTO HIS LATER YEARS.
MICHAEL IRVIN'S CAREER WAS SHORTENED BECAUSE HE WAS A COKE-HEAD.
TIM BROWN> TO MICHAEL IRVIN ANY DAY. TRUST ME. TIM BROWN WAS A MUCH BETTER TALENT THAN IRVIN. ONLY REASON MICHAEL IS IN THE HOF ALLREADY IS BECAUSE HE PLAYED FOR A DYNASTY.
Ok homie maybe at a point early in his career he was a allpro. When I say allpro, that means the top 2 wideout for that peticular year in both conferences combined! If he was that many times then my bad! I remeber him bein a good possession reciever and not a blazer but whatever. Again he played along time so his numbers are good, but I do not think he was a more talented wideout then Irvin. Kick returner aint in this argument so why bring that up?? Rice didnt return kicks. Anyway well just agree to disagree and leave it at that!! Got Em!!
thats every raider fans excuse, but when Jerry and Brown where on the same team, Jerry had better numbers still!!!! Also why you talking about Gannon like he is some scrub? dude was a MVP, and a pro bowler.
. Jerry Rice made Elvis Grbac look like the second coming.
. Jerry Rice made Elvis Grbac look like the second coming.
2001
Rice-83 rec, Yards 1,139, TD 9
Brown-91 rec, Yards 1,165 TD 9
2002
Rice-92 rec, Yards 1,211, TD 7
Brown-81 rec, Yards 930, TD 2
2003
Rice-63 rec, Yards 869, TD 2
Brown-52 rec, Yards 567 TD