Who should Floyd Mayweather fight next?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Floyd opponents


  • Total voters
    32

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
51
Naw Broner would beat Garcia. That would be a sicc Co-Main Event though. Got Em!!
 
Last edited:
Mar 22, 2007
1,196
374
0
37
I do. Im sure Matthysse would win the rematch as well. Not only that but if Judah wins who in the heck would want to see Garcia/Judah 2 over Garcia/Matthysse 2? Got Em!!
What did you see in the fight that makes you think LUCAS would do well a second time around?
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
51
What did you see in the fight that makes you think LUCAS would do well a second time around?
Lucas was riding high after all those knockouts. I think this time hell be a bit more patient going for the knockout and wont be a big target for those left hooks by Garcia. Just think hell have a better gameplan and will get the ko this time being a bit sharper this time around. Got Em!!
 
Mar 22, 2007
1,196
374
0
37
Lucas was riding high after all those knockouts. I think this time hell be a bit more patient going for the knockout and wont be a big target for those left hooks by Garcia. Just think hell have a better gameplan and will get the ko this time being a bit sharper this time around. Got Em!!
I think him going for a KO at all puts him at risk for a loss. Sorry bro, I dont see Lucas beating Daniel at all. just my opinion tho. Side note: I would love to see a rematch!!
 
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
But sometimes fights aren't built on skills. Imagine if Garcia vs Malignaggi is to happen, all the shit talking that would occur there? Paulie won the shit talking contest vs Broner easily and that weak ass fight received a lot of attention. Or remember Judah was working the shit out of Garcia during the championship rounds vs Garcia? I think Mathysse will get the loser of the Malgnaggi Judah fight as a main event on Showtime. Mathysse will fight Broner if Broner beats Maidana. Broner will still stick to his fighting smaller guys game plan but I do see this being a ppv fight
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
But sometimes fights aren't built on skills. Imagine if Garcia vs Malignaggi is to happen, all the shit talking that would occur there? Paulie won the shit talking contest vs Broner easily and that weak ass fight received a lot of attention. Or remember Judah was working the shit out of Garcia during the championship rounds vs Garcia? I think Mathysse will get the loser of the Malgnaggi Judah fight as a main event on Showtime. Mathysse will fight Broner if Broner beats Maidana. Broner will still stick to his fighting smaller guys game plan but I do see this being a ppv fight
I have no idea what you're talking about Broner moved up 12 pounds to fight Paulie. Manny has fought 4 guys in a row moving up from 140lb and you have nothing bad to say. Broner moves up to 147lb and you still talking shit. Why don't the great GGG move up to fight Ward? We all know why GGG is to scared to move up. Broner couldn't stayed at 135lb and knocked everyone out like Mikey Garcia, or he could've whined about Burns and Vasquez ducking him at 135 like GGG at 160, but no Broner moved up to test himself for real unlike the other hyped up fighters you dick ride. Broner, Garcia, Devon, are about that life boxing for real that don't duck anyone.
 
Props: CZAR and CZAR

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
I've heard quite a few boxing writers say that they think Marquez is above Morales and Barrera. Not enough people even mention Ricardo Lopez. I feel like Sanchez benefits from dying early, like a rapper. We never know what may have been. If Fernando Vargas died right before he fought Tito, people would be saying that he would've been one of the best ever too probably, even though the disparity in their skills is night and day, that's how people are.
 
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
B @bigface weight has nothing to do with who's bigger. If that was the case then Canelo would have also had a longer reach than Canelo. All boxing fans know that the fighter with the longer reach is normally considered the bigger fighter. Paulie cannot fight at 154, Broner can and we all see that. Besides, I'm not talking shit as I've said before that GBP protect a lot of their fighters, from Canelo to Broner so I'm not picking on certain fighters. Besides, he ducked Rios and that's a fact. They both fought at the same weight class and same network and it's known that Rios wanted him bad. Why didn't that fight happen?
 

RM211

Sicc OG
Feb 10, 2006
8,173
6,523
113
39
you must of never heard of ricardo ''finito'' lopez.

btw,''the great'' jc chavez has a history of being a drunk,arrogant asshole.




yea of course I know who he is, but competition wise he doesn't stand a chance against jmm, records don't always mean everything breh. and im talking bout inside the ring, your tryna make it something else. mescans love to get drunk, so what? lol
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
Ricardo Lopez fought everyone available with the exception of Mark Johnson late in his career. He was an exceptionally good fighter. Best movement I think I've ever seen and power in both hands. Sick boxer and one of my all time favorite to watch.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I've heard quite a few boxing writers say that they think Marquez is above Morales and Barrera. Not enough people even mention Ricardo Lopez. I feel like Sanchez benefits from dying early, like a rapper. We never know what may have been. If Fernando Vargas died right before he fought Tito, people would be saying that he would've been one of the best ever too probably, even though the disparity in their skills is night and day, that's how people are.
Look at the guys Sanchez beat though in that short time. Wilfredo Gomez, Azumah Nelson, etc.

I don't know why anyone would have Marquez over Erik Morales or Barrera. Their resumes are so much better.
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
51
I definitely have Morales over Marquez no question. I mean it sucked that he stayed in the sport for to long to kinda tarnish his legacy like a lot of other fighters but I still rank him over Marquez. Marquez better hang them up soon before he does the samething. He looked very slow against Bradley lol. Got Em!!
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,366
6,556
113
42
Na Morales didnt tarnish his legacy. He fought well in some of his last fights. Doesnt mean anything that he got those losses doesn't take away from his accomplishments. If Marquez wasnt screwed outta at least 2 of 3 decisions against Manny he would definitely have been considered better. In the end it made him bulk up to knock out Manny and it worked. Thing that kills me is if Marquez didnt get screwed out of those decisions Manny would never have had all this hype and be so overrated
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Na Morales didnt tarnish his legacy. He fought well in some of his last fights. Doesnt mean anything that he got those losses doesn't take away from his accomplishments. If Marquez wasnt screwed outta at least 2 of 3 decisions against Manny he would definitely have been considered better. In the end it made him bulk up to knock out Manny and it worked. Thing that kills me is if Marquez didnt get screwed out of those decisions Manny would never have had all this hype and be so overrated
Without Pacquiao who the hell would Marquez be though? Marquez was like Pacquiao's Joe Frazier.

Pacquiao was already a hall of famer by the time he fought Marquez a second time beating Barrera and Morales.
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
Sanchez was legit but my point was that, if he went on to get ko'd by JC Chavez then went on a losing streak afterwards or something, he wouldn't have been held in as high of a regard. It's like if Pavlik or Tito would've died before facing Hopkins, Jones Jr. before Tarver etc... Either way, he obviously was legit while he was alive.

That's how I feel too. I think Morales was amazing and he's one of my favorite fighters. But fat Dan and Kieran Mulvaney, and I want to say Bert Sugar all thought Marquez was higher all time than Morales and Barrera. They all rank Barrera higher than Morales based on Barrera winning twice over Morales too. I still rank Morales higher. And I think his comeback only elevated his stance to me. He was clearly out of shape and washed up but even 5% of the old Erik Morales was still a badass. He knocked out Cano when he was undefeated and I thought he narrowly beat Maidana with a ridiculously swollen eye since the first round. Maidana is in a pick 'em fight with Broner obviously. Morales was sick.
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
Without Pacquiao who the hell would Marquez be though? Marquez was like Pacquiao's Joe Frazier.

Pacquiao was already a hall of famer by the time he fought Marquez a second time beating Barrera and Morales.
Marquez would've had a great career but not in that upper echelon of Mexican fighters to me. He would've been in the hall of fame, probably by the 2nd time he fought Pacquiao too. I still feel like Ricardo Lopez is slept on more than any fighter in the history of boxing.