WEATHER CONTROL

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 27, 2002
2,067
2
0
#1
WEATHER AS A FORCE MULTIPLIER: OWNING THE WEATHER IN 2025
MILITARY APPLICATIONS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION



In 2025 US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to warfighting applications. Such a capability offers the warfighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high risk/high reward endeavor, weather modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns, to complete dominance of global communications and counter-space control, weather modification offers the warfighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Current technologies which will mature over the next thirty years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather modification ability into a capability. In the US, weather modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include: unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;" in 2025 we can "Own the Weather."



ABOVETOPSECRET.COM

-WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS NOTION THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE WEATHER IN 2025? I WAS ON THE SITE RESEARCHING THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION AND COUNSEL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, AND THIS CAUGHT MY EYE.
 
May 12, 2002
3,583
101
0
GoProGraphics.com
#6
Cool. I once designed a WEATHER CONTROLING MACHINE when i was high. When my high wore off, it seemed possible, but the power needed to control it was probably not affordable by anyone.
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#7
Yeah, man is going to control the weather, and there is also a big jolly fat guy called Santa Claus who drives flying reindeer and gives out presents. And his homeboy is a giant bunny rabbit that hides eggs on easter. And don't forget the man called Superman who can fly so fast he can make time go backwards.

If you believe that man can control weather conditions, you might as well get fitted for your rubber helmet and matching straight jacket, cause you are fucking insane.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#8
Vyasadeva said:
Yeah, man is going to control the weather, and there is also a big jolly fat guy called Santa Claus who drives flying reindeer and gives out presents. And his homeboy is a giant bunny rabbit that hides eggs on easter. And don't forget the man called Superman who can fly so fast he can make time go backwards.

If you believe that man can control weather conditions, you might as well get fitted for your rubber helmet and matching straight jacket, cause you are fucking insane.

first of all, i haven't read the article.
second of all, i do believe man will be able to control the weather. You underestimate technology. Take the computer you use to read this shit, who would have known such a thing would have existed, 500 years ago?

btw of the 3 which one doesn't fit?
santus claus Easter Bunny Superman

one more thing, time travel is possiable in theory!!!!
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#9
second of all, i do believe man will be able to control the weather. You underestimate technology. Take the computer you use to read this shit, who would have known such a thing would have existed, 500 years ago?
Bwahaaaaaaaaahahahahhhaaaa... Good shit.

You are clearly a lunatic if you think man can or will control the weather.

As for the computer I'm using, it aint that impressive. In case you haven't noticed, the computer you are using to read this is simply a poor imitation of a vastly superior computer called the mind. Man can't even calculate the speed of the mind, much less pinpoint it within a head or create one.

So no, I do not underestimate technology, you OVERestimate it.

btw of the 3 which one doesn't fit?
santus claus Easter Bunny Superman
None of them fit, they are all fictitious persons. But if you are gullible enough to believe that man can control weather conditions then you might as well believe in all three of those characters.

one more thing, time travel is possiable in theory!!!!
So what? *ANY* thing is possible "in theory". That's why it is called a theory, because it remains unproven and unknown, and therefore we can say anything is possible in theory.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#10
nefar559 said:
first of all, i haven't read the article.
second of all, i do believe man will be able to control the weather. You underestimate technology. Take the computer you use to read this shit, who would have known such a thing would have existed, 500 years ago?
Vyasadeva said:
Bwahaaaaaaaaahahahahhhaaaa... Good shit.

You are clearly a lunatic if you think man can or will control the weather.

As for the computer I'm using, it aint that impressive. In case you haven't noticed, the computer you are using to read this is simply a poor imitation of a vastly superior computer called the mind. Man can't even calculate the speed of the mind, much less pinpoint it within a head or create one.

So no, I do not underestimate technology, you OVERestimate it.

ok i see you know the future. Man will do shit in 50, 100 years you wouldnt dream possiable....computer aint that impressive? shit you dont appreciate anything...if you were to go back 500years, ppl would be impressed?

funnie how you play with words

next quesiton this is what i said:
nefar559 said:

btw of the 3 which one doesn't fit?
santus claus Easter Bunny Superman
this is what you said:

Vyasadeva said:

None of them fit, they are all fictitious persons. But if you are gullible enough to believe that man can control weather conditions then you might as well believe in all three of those characters.
none of them fit? LMAO do u undderstand the question? have you taken the SATs? you would know what i was talking about. Superman would be the one that wouldn't fit, becuase superman is not a fictional charector that kids are made to believe in, like Santua Claus and the Easter Bunny, this is no superman holiday. anyways just threw that one in, becusae superman to me came out of nowhere when i read your statment


Vyasadeva said:

So what? *ANY* thing is possible "in theory". That's why it is called a theory, because it remains unproven and unknown, and therefore we can say anything is possible in theory.
a man a scienctific theory is back up with laws (physics laws). therefore you just can't put out anything and say its a theory, you gotta have some to back it up.