Wait... who goes to hell?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE KRSNA(THE ALMIgHTY) AS A CHILD? WHO MADE HIS MAMA THEN? AIN'T HE THE BEgINNIN' AND THE END, OR AS NINEWUNSIX5150 WOULD PUT IT, "THE ABSOLUTE"? HOW COULD CUZZ BE A LIL BLUE FAg-BOY? THAT DON'T MAKE SENSE
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
43
www.facebook.com
THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE KRSNA(THE ALMIgHTY) AS A CHILD? WHO MADE HIS MAMA THEN? AIN'T HE THE BEgINNIN' AND THE END, OR AS NINEWUNSIX5150 WOULD PUT IT, "THE ABSOLUTE"?
Just because Krishna appears as the child of Devaki doesn't mean that He was created by Devaki. This is His mercy. He exists eternally and the Supreme Lord. You know how some Christians say that Jesus is God? Yet Jesus took birth from the womb of Mary. So apply the same reasoning.
 
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
37
Yet Jesus took birth from the womb of Mary. So apply the same reasoning.
You make my head itch so bad, He was born from a Divine Virgin Birth. He was never Made, he already Existed with the Father and the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit entered into Marry and she Conceived Jesus with no sex. That's all I'm gonna say, cause your a head case.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
Just because Krishna appears as the child of Devaki doesn't mean that He was created by Devaki. This is His mercy. He exists eternally and the Supreme Lord. You know how some Christians say that Jesus is God? Yet Jesus took birth from the womb of Mary. So apply the same reasoning.
BUT JESUS AIN'T (gOD). YOU TRYIN' TO EQUATE LIES TO YOUR UNDA-STANDIN'.
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
43
www.facebook.com
Stockton209SS said:
I could care less of that Idol, but What is the Relationships between Krishna and Shiva?
Well, Jesus loves His father. You shouldn't call Him an idol.


Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Lord Shiva's position is rather unique actually. You see, in general there are two categories of living entities. There is the jiva-tattva, which is what we are, and then there is the Visnu-tattva, which is God, His incarnations and expansions. Basically, Lord Shiva is above jiva but below Visnu. He is an expansion of the Supreme Lord that comes in contact with the material nature. The Supreme Lord Visnu, or Krishna does not ever become contaminated by the material modes of nature.

In the Brahma Samhita 5.45, Vishnu and Shiva are explained as being like milk and yogurt. When milk comes in contact with a yogurt culture, it becomes yogurt. So both are basically milk, but one has taken the form of yogurt.

The same verse is given in the Chaitanya Charitamrta, Madhya-lila 20.310:

"Milk changes into yogurt when mixed with a yogurt culture, but actually it is constitutionally nothing but milk. Similarly, Govinda, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, assumes the form of Lord Siva [Sambhu] for the special purpose of material transactions. I offer my obeisances at His lotus feet."
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
43
www.facebook.com
Stockton209SS said:
You make my head itch so bad, He was born from a Divine Virgin Birth. He was never Made, he already Existed with the Father and the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit entered into Marry and she Conceived Jesus with no sex. That's all I'm gonna say, cause your a head case.
Hey genius, what did I say? Apply this same reasoning to Krishna.


EDIT: Krishna is the Father in your Holy trinity example.
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
43
www.facebook.com
EDJ said:
BUT JESUS AIN'T (gOD). YOU TRYIN' TO EQUATE LIES TO YOUR UNDA-STANDIN'.
That is fine. I was just referring to the reasoning some Christians give for Jesus being God.

Krishna takes birth by His internal, Yogamaya potency. He does not accept a material (mahamaya) body. He is not the result of human sperm and human egg. Just like the virgin birth of Jesus. Remember, God is all-powerful, so He can do this.

next question.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
n9newunsixx5150 said:
This is an artists rendition of Lord Krsna showing Arjuna His universal form. Actually, it is not possible to draw the universal form, for obvious reasons.
In that pic Krsna is speaking with Arjuna and it is obvious that Arjuna is in awe or worshipping (by the way his hands are held.) Now, here is the question. Is Krsna independent of the Universal form or is he showing him a vision?
 
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
37
Here's a kind of crazy Question, how can you make a Picture of something that Has Universal knowledge. Since we obviously don't have Universal Knowledge, how can these Artists know how Kristna Looks Like, and If it's not the Right Portrayal of HE/SHE won't that offend SHIM(she/him) if the Picture is not right of SHIM?