VOLUNTARY HOLDOUT DERRICK BURGESS

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Sep 26, 2005
1,595
0
0
40
#1
It now can be confirmed. Pro Bowl defensive end Derrick Burgess did not report to the Raiders' voluntary organized team activities because he does not have the contract he wants.

Over the past two seasons, no NFL player has had more sacks than Burgess, who has rung up 27 -- 1½ more than Miami's Jason Taylor, 3½ more than Carolina's Julius Peppers, 4½ more than St. Louis' Leonard Little.

Yet Burgess is still playing under the five-year, $15 million contract he signed with Oakland, which is less in total value than the $19.5 million in guaranteed money the Seattle Seahawks gave defensive end Patrick Kerney on a six-year, $39.5 million deal. When Kerney's guaranteed money exceeds Burgess' total money, there is a discrepancy the Oakland defensive end feels needs to be addressed

While Kerney's contract numbers dwarf Burgess' off the field, Burgess' dwarf Kerney's on the field.

During the past two seasons, Burgess has had 16 more sacks than Kerney and now he is hoping to be rewarded for it. Until he is, he might not report back to the Raiders, though it doesn't sound as though Burgess has made any long-term decisions yet about how to handle the situation and potential holdout.

But this is just another slice of fallout from the big money showered on some of the NFL's players this offseason.

While players such as Kerney and cornerback Nate Clements cashed in, other players such as Burgess and cornerback Asante Samuel got ticked off.

http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10123609
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#4
give him tha money...

prob wants to be a niner? lol get tha fuck outta here wit that..

He became who he is with the Raiders... Now show him that $$$$ because he outta all ppl on this team has def. earned it
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#11
^get outta here.. Raiders gave Burgess the chance to come here for him to make a real name for himself and he has in his past 2 seasons on this team.. Al gonna pay him.. believe it
 
Sep 26, 2005
1,595
0
0
40
#14
ECOSE said:
ohh man ....they gonna pay him...no one is that fuckin retarded..compensate the man
u never know, still he earned it they should pay him, wherez tony'z 2 centz he get banned aint seen him on here today wow 2 quite
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#15
IronLungs420 said:
he probably wants to be a niner!
NO. HE'D NEVER BE A NINER. THIS IS JUST THE MEDIA TRYIN TO STIR SHIT UP. HE WILL BE PAID PROPTLY AND PAID WELL. EVERYONE IN THE ORGANIZATION KNOWS HOW IMPORTANT IT IS FOR HIM TO BE A RAIDER. HIM AND SAPP ARE THE HEART AND SOUL OF OUR DEFENSE.
 
Sep 26, 2005
1,595
0
0
40
#16
Solitary 1 said:
NO. HE'D NEVER BE A NINER. THIS IS JUST THE MEDIA TRYIN TO STIR SHIT UP. HE WILL BE PAID PROPTLY AND PAID WELL. EVERYONE IN THE ORGANIZATION KNOWS HOW IMPORTANT IT IS FOR HIM TO BE A RAIDER. HIM AND SAPP ARE THE HEART AND SOUL OF OUR DEFENSE.
thought u said it waz all about sandz and kelly, sapp did a good job lazt yr 2 bad he gettin older. off topic any of yall seen that interview on raiders.com newberry said he only got 1-2 yrz in himself and he wantz to show jake how to play better
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#19
Even if the raiders didn't pay him and he wanted out, the Niners wouldn't end up with him. He wouldn't want to come to SF because he's a raider fan, and I doubt the Niners would even pursue him. So kill it.
 
Sep 26, 2005
1,595
0
0
40
#20
Solitary 1 said:
WHERE DID YOU GET THIS? I SAID THEY WERE SOLID RUN-STUFFERS. I'VE ALWAYS THOUGHT BURGESS AND SAPP WERE THE HEART OF OUR DEFENSE.
it waz a while back but u said sandz waz a sav and kelly gettin there didnt mention sapp so i thought u waz favorin sandz over sapp my bad

i remember in a interview burgess said he likez playin w tha young d in oakland makez him feel younger