USSR - Communist? or a form of state capitalism?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#21
THA RIPPA said:
And dont forget the fact that in communist regimes, the people who were the speechwriters, the backbones to the whole movement, were usually X'd off just as the communist ideal becomes official. That means the die hard supporters (like you 2-0) would be seen as a threat to power, and would most likely be snatched in broad daylight or go on a trip and never return.
Is that right Rippa? I didn't know this is how it works. Can you please refer to where Marx or Engles said this? Maybe it's in the communist manifesto? :rolleyes:
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#22
Actually 206 this "did" happen among probably 9/10 of the "communist" governments we've seen in Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Americas. Although you owuld argue those regimes were communist in name only.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#23
WHITE DEVIL said:
3. No incentive to surpass the fellow man...Would a janitor make what a scientist makes? etc.
Lenin explains in the "State and Revolution", and Marx explains in "Critique of the Gotha Program", it is impossible to jump straight from capitalism to communism. Remember, it's a process.

As I stated before, the only incentive to work harder under Capitalism is "work so you can pay your rent, your mortgage, your interest on credit card and school loans, your over-priced food, healthcare, transportation, and entertainment, and so on or starve and be homeless". That is the only incentive capitalism offers you can you and I. Why work more efficiently at work if you know you have to be there for 8 hours no matter what? Just as I was typing messages through out the day at work, I didn't give a fuck. I had to be there till 5, no matter what.

Under socialism, the incentive to come up with more efficient ways to do things is that we'd have to work less time to do the same amount of work. "The amount of NECESSARY labor needed to produce the things we NEED" like food, housing, etc. would gradually decrease so that eventually the working hours would shorten significanlty. Of course as humans we would not be lazy and sit around...humans are curious, exploratory, and want to learn, invent, etc. You and I, I'm sure, would spend most of our free time learning. Our free time would be spent creating ever better works of art, scientific research, cures for diseases, etc. After a period of time, the new generations will not even know what it was like under capitalism, and the productivity of labor will be tremendoulsy high.

2. Ideology of the proletariat and the "selfish pig"
What's wrong with the ideology? I assume you don't have a problem with "proletariat" - "is that class of society which does not have ownership of the means of production. Therefore, the only source of income for proletarians is wage labor. "

So, I assume your problem is with the "selfish-pig". Going back to what you said about your parents...they are not the "selfish-pig", they are the working class. As you stated, their income is amoungst the top 5%, but the costs of living where they are obviously lower them to the point of middle class.

When I say "Selfish-pig" I mean the elite group of people, the REAL rich individuals who control this country and exploit the working class. The wealth created by all these workers is not shared equally, the corporations and billionnaires keep a very unequal share for themselves. Bill Gates? A handful of people are making the money, pulling the strings and only care about themselves and making their pockets fatter while millions starve, are homeless, and unemployed. They don't care about the average man...all they care about are themselves. Under communsim, or socialism, the surplus wealth produced by working people would be used to provide better wages, benefits, healthcare, education, safety conditions, new technology that could reduce the working day, etc. etc. etc.

1. Quota workers/Goes against Human nature
I don't understand what you mean. Can you elaborate?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#24
WHITE DEVIL said:
Actually 206 this "did" happen among probably 9/10 of the "communist" governments we've seen in Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Americas. Although you owuld argue those regimes were communist in name only.
Lets not forget that America isn't the only Capitalist country. These same things have occured in many, if not all, capitalist countries.

Let us also not forget that it wasn't that long ago, in our own capitalist country that things like this occured...



 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#25
Although not directed to me

2-0-Sixx said:
As I stated before, the only incentive to work harder under Capitalism is "work so you can pay your rent, your mortgage, your interest on credit card and school loans, your over-priced food, healthcare, transportation, and entertainment, and so on or starve and be homeless". That is the only incentive capitalism offers you can you and I. Why work more efficiently at work if you know you have to be there for 8 hours no matter what? Just as I was typing messages through out the day at work, I didn't give a fuck. I had to be there till 5, no matter what.
That's the negative stereotype people give capitalism. Much like when people give communism a negative stereotype.
2-0-Sixx said:
Under socialism, the incentive to come up with more efficient ways to do things is that we'd have to work less time to do the same amount of work. "The amount of NECESSARY labor needed to produce the things we NEED" like food, housing, etc. would gradually decrease so that eventually the working hours would shorten significanlty. Of course as humans we would not be lazy and sit around...humans are curious, exploratory, and want to learn, invent, etc. You and I, I'm sure, would spend most of our free time learning. Our free time would be spent creating ever better works of art, scientific research, cures for diseases, etc. After a period of time, the new generations will not even know what it was like under capitalism, and the productivity of labor will be tremendoulsy high.
Sorry Comrade but what world are you living in? If we're not conditioned from an early age we become monsters. Take for example a child. If he knows you will give him a cookie everytime he asks he will keep asking. If you tell him he has to clean up his room to get the cookie the kid might think it over. But if he knows that Mom will give him an equal piece of the cookie no matter what then he has no incentive to work for the cookie.
2-0-Sixx said:
What's wrong with the ideology? I assume you don't have a problem with "proletariat" - "is that class of society which does not have ownership of the means of production. Therefore, the only source of income for proletarians is wage labor. "
just so i dont sound like some corporate fat cat I personally think the government should work for the working class. Remember the governments main purpose should be to serve not be served.
2-0-Sixx said:
When I say "Selfish-pig" I mean the elite group of people, the REAL rich individuals who control this country and exploit the working class. The wealth created by all these workers is not shared equally, the corporations and billionnaires keep a very unequal share for themselves. Bill Gates? A handful of people are making the money, pulling the strings and only care about themselves and making their pockets fatter while millions starve, are homeless, and unemployed. They don't care about the average man...all they care about are themselves. Under communsim, or socialism, the surplus wealth produced by working people would be used to provide better wages, benefits, healthcare, education, safety conditions, new technology that could reduce the working day, etc. etc. etc.
These "selfish-pigs" exist everywhere. Communism, Socialism, Feudalims, etc. The only form of government free from them is Anarchy but Anarchy depends more on human kindness than communism and capitalism combined.

My favorite quote:
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. (George Orwell. Animal Farm) clearly defines Stalinism, Maoism, Fidelism, even Americanism, etc, etc.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#26
I don't want to sound rude, mainly because your sig is tight, but you need to clarify your comments a bit. "That's the negative stereotype people give capitalism. Much like when people give communism a negative stereotype." Explain please.

Sorry Comrade but what world are you living in? If we're not conditioned from an early age we become monsters.
LOL, your trippin. Remember comrade, we are taught things, just like we are taught that this is a dog eat dog world.

just so i dont sound like some corporate fat cat I personally think the government should work for the working class. Remember the governments main purpose should be to serve not be served.
Remember comrade, the government which is elected does not really have much choice of what policies to follow. When the 3 richest people in the US have a combined wealth equal to more than 115 million ordinary Americans, they are the ones who really run the country. The working class has absolutely no say.

Under socialism on the other hand, the economic resources of the country would not be in private hands, but in the hands of the people. This would be a REAL democracy. They would be able to democratically elect their representatives in government, and at the same time these representatives would have real power over the economy, to really change things. These officials would be subject to immediate recall at any time and these elected officials would not earn any more than a skilled worker, thus eliminating the greed factor.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#27
2-0-Sixx said:
Under socialism on the other hand, the economic resources of the country would not be in private hands, but in the hands of the people. This would be a REAL democracy. They would be able to democratically elect their representatives in government, and at the same time these representatives would have real power over the economy, to really change things. These officials would be subject to immediate recall at any time and these elected officials would not earn any more than a skilled worker, thus eliminating the greed factor.
This scares me. Ever read anything by fareed zakaria. I don't trust direct democracies. The average American is an idiot. I trust the average American *almost* less than I trust elected officials.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#28
Actually I take that back. A direct democracy may be superior to the system we have now, but I don't see it as a flawless system, or even a good one.

The average AmeriKKKan could tell you more about Springer or American Idol than they could about the electoral college.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#29
2-0-Sixx said:
I don't want to sound rude, mainly because your sig is tight, but you need to clarify your comments a bit. "That's the negative stereotype people give capitalism. Much like when people give communism a negative stereotype." Explain please.
What I meant is go to any average American and ask them why Communism sucks and they'll tell you because it's a totalitarian government where you work for next to nothing. Then go to the Average Russian (Cold War-era) and ask them the same question and they'll tell you Communism is where the worker works for next to nothing while the richer get richer. Same shit different forms of government.
BTW the one with braids...a fucking 8!
2-0-Sixx said:
LOL, your trippin. Remember comrade, we are taught things, just like we are taught that this is a dog eat dog world.
There is a difference. One is contioned one is thought. I doubt many parents teach their kids why they should work for the cookie, they condition them to work for the cookie. Also because this world IS dog eat dog is why I find it hard for Communism and Socialism (and Anarchy to work on such a big scale).
2-0-Sixx said:
Remember comrade, the government which is elected does not really have much choice of what policies to follow. When the 3 richest people in the US have a combined wealth equal to more than 115 million ordinary Americans, they are the ones who really run the country. The working class has absolutely no say.
This is also why the USSR failed. Much like the wealth oriented US in all Communist countries you have to give all your power up to one of your fellow comrads and he reaps all the benefits for himself. This has happened with all Communist governments on a big scale. Although I'm sure it can be done (communism) I dont see it happening any time soon.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#30
WHITE DEVIL said:
Actually I take that back. A direct democracy may be superior to the system we have now, but I don't see it as a flawless system, or even a good one.

The average AmeriKKKan could tell you more about Springer or American Idol than they could about the electoral college.
Those two statements seem contradictiory. How can the average American have a say in everything (thats a democracy) yet you dont see them as very smart? A republic is the better alternative. I just wish that representatives listened to their constituents.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#31
WHITE DEVIL said:
This scares me. Ever read anything by fareed zakaria. I don't trust direct democracies. The average American is an idiot. I trust the average American *almost* less than I trust elected officials.
Well, again...remember it's a process. The average american is a dip shit because there is not enough money going in education and/or the government wants it that way. With communism education is the #1 priority.

So what's the alternative? If you dislike communsim, and capitalism either isn't working, or wont last forever, what do you suggest? What's your thoughts?
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#32
The form of government we have is pretty good (although not the best). I just wish it had socialized health care and education. The UBER Government is of course a worldwide dictatorship under my rule.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#34
THA RIPPA said:
Its not in the manifesto, its what happened in REAL LIFE. I'm sure you knew this which is why you dodged the basis to the question.

Is that the reason you dodged the basis of my reply?

2-0-Sixx said:
Lets not forget that America isn't the only Capitalist country. These same things have occured in many, if not all, capitalist countries.

Let us also not forget that it wasn't that long ago, in our own capitalist country that things like this occured...



My point is, just because some of those things occured in USSR, does't mean that's how communism works. Look at mexico. Is that how capitalism works?
 
May 27, 2002
2,067
2
0
#35
What you are forgetting though is what WHITE DEVIL used in reference to my post....USSR wasnt the only place in which this occured. So far you've only given me Mexico.