either the 1st or 5th one....the 1st one is bright and that makes it more legible....but same time might be too bright to match the whole cover.....the 5th one is darker and more legible then the ones wit patterns in em.....load up the 1st and 5th one bigger cuz its hard to tell wit the thumbnails....
^THE CUSTOMER WANTED SOMETHIN' SHINY(PLAQUE-LIKE) TO BRINg OUT THE "gENERAL" AND gIVE IT THAT SOPHISTICATED LOOK(THAT'S OUR WHOLE AIM), THUS THE TITLE "gENERAL" AND THE CONCEPT OF THE ALBUM. WHAT FONT WOULD YOU SUgKEST THAT IS "gENERAL-LIKE". AND WHAT TEXTURE WOULD COMPLIMENT THAT?
^THE CUSTOMER WANTED SOMETHIN' SHINY(PLAQUE-LIKE) TO BRINg OUT THE "gENERAL" AND gIVE IT THAT SOPHISTICATED LOOK(THAT'S OUR WHOLE AIM), THUS THE TITLE "gENERAL" AND THE CONCEPT OF THE ALBUM. WHAT FONT WOULD YOU SUgKEST THAT IS "gENERAL-LIKE". AND WHAT TEXTURE WOULD COMPLIMENT THAT?
I'M NOT EVEN USIN' gREY. IT'S A CHROME EFFECT ON A WHITE SURFACE. THE OTHA SHIT ARE JUST HOW IT LOOKS WITH DIFFERENT BLEND MODES. BUT WHAT FONT IS THAT THAT YOU ARE SUgKESTIN'?
shit either one looks a lot better.....its nice n legible now and i like how you jus made the e into the 3 and let it work double time........its up to the client in the long run...good job.......