To all you Jamarcus Russell haters and doubters

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
39
His completion percentage improved, other than that.. Nothing. 1 TD to 2 INTs is NOT good.
completion percentage and yards... he hasn't broken 200 yards all season until today

come on Fatal... you know I've been all over Russell, and very critical of him... and I'm not saying these numbers are anything to be excited about... but it shows improvement

when you looked at his stats for the first 5 weeks you would think... wow... Russell played horrible... those stats are really bad

when you look at the stats from this game you think... ok... he had a couple ints... but he had an overall average game

again... the key word here is improvement

obviously he has to show us he can continue to improve, but should Raiders fans not be happy that he's playing better than he has the past 5 weeks???
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
completion percentage and yards... he hasn't broken 200 yards all season until today

come on Fatal... you know I've been all over Russell, and very critical of him... and I'm not saying these numbers are anything to be excited about... but it shows improvement

when you looked at his stats for the first 5 weeks you would think... wow... Russell played horrible... those stats are really bad

when you look at the stats from this game you think... ok... he had a couple ints... but he had an overall average game

again... the key word here is improvement

obviously he has to show us he can continue to improve, but should Raiders fans not be happy that he's playing better than he has the past 5 weeks???
What does any of that have to do with the numbers not being good? Did I say he didn't show improvement? No, I said those numbers are not GOOD. Dude posted them up as if they were great numbers or something to be proud of - that's the discussion I'm participating in.
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
39
What does any of that have to do with the numbers not being good? Did I say he didn't show improvement? No, I said those numbers are not GOOD. Dude posted them up as if they were great numbers - that's the discussion I'm participating in.
I think you're assuming that's why he posted them

I can't speak for radiostationrep, but he never flat out stated.... "these are good numbers"

maybe he did think they were great numbers, I don't know... he's gonna have to answer that question

they're def not great numbers, but they show improvement, which is why I though the posted them, but I dunno
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
What does any of that have to do with the numbers not being good? Did I say he didn't show improvement? No, I said those numbers are not GOOD. Dude posted them up as if they were great numbers or something to be proud of - that's the discussion I'm participating in.
try again. re-read my original post. quit it already. let me blow this grandaddy in peace BRO!
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
Cards, Seahawks >>>> raiders.

You're really gonna start arguing that the Niners aren't better than the raiders after 4 weeks of horrible football followed up by one good showing?

Are you sure you didn't already take that grandaddy to the head?
i'm saying as good as the niners have played and as bad as the raiders have played, we only have one less win. we havent played our best football where as the niners may have...