STRANGE MUSIC FOOTBALL LEAGUE

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 8, 2002
5,259
34
48
46
www.techn9nehq.com
#28
Robby2Slobby said:
Well, I don't think QBs should be equal to RBs and WRs when it comes to yards per point.. But doesn't really bother me, just makes QBs the dominant position.

RB and WR should get a point every 10 yds. QB's aren't really a dominant position in most leagues...with the exception of Manning and Palmer.

Plus it looks like this league will even out with interceptions counting for -2 pts.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#30
I am Da Bomb Squad.

Leave the coring the way it is, this is VERY standard scoring and doesn't inflate the QB's too highly. In order for a qb to get 10 points they need to throw 200 yards, were a running back only need 100, that's fair, also take into account the -2 for int's , a 4 int game will cost you 8 points (a td and 50 yards)

the scoring is fine!
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
40
#35
Passing Yards (20 yards per point)
Rushing Yards (20 yards per point)
Reception Yards (20 yards per point)

That's how it's set up right now.. Which is why I figured Passing Yards should be higher..
 
Aug 8, 2002
5,259
34
48
46
www.techn9nehq.com
#38
Robby2Slobby said:
Passing Yards (20 yards per point)
Rushing Yards (20 yards per point)
Reception Yards (20 yards per point)

That's how it's set up right now.. Which is why I figured Passing Yards should be higher..
That's silly, now I know what you're saying


Yeah, it should be...

Passing - 20yds=1pt
Rushing - 10yds=1pt
Receiving - 10yds=1pt