Some thoughts about Jesus Christ.

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 10, 2004
993
0
0
#1
"PEOPLE brought him [Jesus Christ] many demon-possessed persons; and he expelled the spirits with a word, and he cured all who were faring badly." (Matthew 8:16) "He [Jesus] roused himself and rebuked the wind and said to the sea: 'Hush! Be quiet!' And the wind abated, and a great calm set in." (Mark 4:39) How do you view these statements? Do you believe that they describe actual, historical events, or do you feel that they are allegorical stories, mere myths?

Many today express serious doubts about the historicity of Jesus' miracles. This era of the telescope and the microscope, of space exploration and of genetic engineering, seems to allow little room for reports of miraculous works and divine wonders.

Some feel that accounts of miracles are fantastic or allegorical. According to the writer of a book that purports to explore the "real" Jesus, the stories about Christ's miracles are nothing more than "marketing devices" to propagate Christianity.

Others view Jesus' miracles as outright frauds. The charge of deception is sometimes hurled at Jesus himself. According to Justin Martyr of the second century C.E., Jesus' detractors "even ventured to call him a magician and a deceiver of the people." Some allege that Jesus "did not perform his miracles as a Jewish prophet, but as a magician, an initiate of the heathen temples."

Defining Impossibility
You may feel that behind such doubts, there is a fundamental reason why people are reluctant to believe in miracles. They just find it difficult, even impossible, to accept the thought that supernatural forces could be at work. "Miracles just do not happen—period," said a young person who called himself an agnostic. He then quoted the words of 18th-century Scottish philosopher David Hume, who wrote: "A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature."

However, many would be very cautious about asserting that a certain phenomenon is impossible. The World Book Encyclopedia calls a miracle "an event that cannot be explained through the known laws of nature." By that definition, space travel, wireless communication, and satellite navigation would have seemed to most to be "miracles" just a century ago. Surely it is unwise to assert that miracles are impossible simply because we cannot explain them based on present knowledge.

If we examine some of the Scriptural evidence surrounding miracles ascribed to Jesus Christ, what will we find? Are Jesus' miracles fact or fiction?

YOU may be surprised to learn that the Bible accounts of Jesus' life on earth never use the original-language word for "miracle." The Greek word (dy'na·mis) sometimes translated "miracle" literally means "power." (Luke 8:46) It may also be rendered "ability" or "powerful works." (Matthew 11:20; 25:15) According to one scholar, this Greek term "emphasizes the mighty work that has been done, and, in particular, the power by which it was accomplished. The event is described in terms of the power of God in action."

Another Greek term (te'ras) is usually rendered "portent" or "wonder." (John 4:48; Acts 2:19) This expression highlights the effect on observers. Quite often, the crowd and the disciples were amazed and astounded at Jesus' powerful works.—Mark 2:12; 4:41; 6:51; Luke 9:43.

A third Greek term (se·mei'on) referring to Jesus' miracles denotes a "sign." It "focuses upon the deeper meaning of the miracle," says scholar Robert Deffinbaugh. He adds: "A sign is a miracle which conveys a truth about our Lord Jesus."

Illusion or God-Given Power?
The Bible does not describe Jesus' miracles as tricks or illusions designed to entertain people. They were manifestations of "the majestic power of God," as in the case of a boy from whom Jesus expelled a demon. (Luke 9:37-43) Would such powerful works be impossible for Almighty God—the One who is described as having an "abundance of dynamic energy"? (Isaiah 40:26) Of course not!

The Gospel accounts refer to some 35 miracles of Jesus. But the total number of his miracles is not revealed. For instance, Matthew 14:14 states: "He [Jesus] saw a great crowd; and he felt pity for them, and he cured their sick ones." We are not told how many sick people he cured on that occasion.

Such powerful works were central to Jesus' claim that he was the Son of God, the promised Messiah. The Scriptures did indeed show that God-given power enabled Jesus to perform miracles. The apostle Peter referred to Jesus as "a man publicly shown by God to you through powerful works and portents and signs that God did through him in your midst, just as you yourselves know." (Acts 2:22) On another occasion, Peter pointed out that "God anointed him [Jesus] with holy spirit and power, and he went through the land doing good and healing all those oppressed by the Devil; because God was with him."—Acts 10:37, 38.

The miracles of Jesus were intertwined with his message. Mark 1:21-27 reveals the reaction of the crowd to Jesus' teaching and to one of his miracles. Mark 1:22 says that the crowds "became astounded at his way of teaching," and verse 27 points out that the people were "astonished" when he expelled a demon. Both Jesus' powerful works and his message provided proof that he was the promised Messiah.

Jesus did not merely claim that he was the Messiah; along with his words and other deeds, the God-given power displayed in his miracles furnished evidence of his Messiahship. When questions about his role and commission arose, Jesus boldly replied: "I have the witness greater than that of John [the Baptizer], for the very works that my Father assigned me to accomplish, the works themselves that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father dispatched me."—John 5:36.

Marks of Authenticity
Why can we be certain that Jesus' miracles were real, authentic? Consider some of the marks of authenticity.

In performing his powerful works, Jesus never drew attention to himself. He made sure that the result of any miracle was that God received the credit and the glory. Before curing a blind man, for instance, Jesus stressed that the healing would take place "in order that the works of God might be made manifest in his case."—John 9:1-3; 11:1-4.

Unlike illusionists, magicians, and faith healers, Jesus never used hypnotism, trickery, spectacular displays, magic spells, or emotional rituals. He did not resort to superstition or the use of relics. Note the unassuming way in which Jesus healed two blind men. "Moved with pity," says the account, "Jesus touched their eyes, and immediately they received sight, and they followed him." (Matthew 20:29-34) No ritual, ceremony, or showy display was involved. Jesus performed his miraculous works in the open, often before numerous eyewitnesses. He did not use special lighting, staging, or props. In contrast, alleged modern-day miracles often defy documentation.—Mark 5:24-29; Luke 7:11-15.

Jesus sometimes acknowledged the faith of those who benefited from his miracles. But a person's lack of faith did not prevent Jesus from performing a miracle. While he was in Capernaum in Galilee, "people brought him many demon-possessed persons; and he expelled the spirits with a word, and he cured all who were faring badly."—Matthew 8:16.

The miracles of Jesus were performed to meet actual physical needs of people, not to satisfy someone's curiosity. (Mark 10:46-52; Luke 23:8) And Jesus never performed miracles in order to profit personally in any way.—Matthew 4:2-4; 10:8.

What About the Gospel Accounts?
The facts about Jesus' miracles have been transmitted to us through the pages of the four Gospels. Are there reasons to rely on these accounts as we examine the authenticity of the miracles attributed to Jesus? Yes, there are.

As already noted, Jesus' miracles were performed in public, before many eyewitnesses. The earliest Gospels were penned at a time when most of those eyewitnesses were still alive. Regarding the honesty of the Gospel writers, the book The Miracles and the Resurrection notes: "To accuse the gospel evangelists of indiscriminately submerging historical fact in a flood of miracle-mongering to serve the interests of theological propaganda would be outright injustice. . . . They meant to be honest recorders."

Jewish opponents of Christianity never challenged the powerful works described in the Gospels. They questioned only the power by which these were performed. (Mark 3:22-26) Neither could later detractors successfully deny Jesus' miracles. On the contrary, during the first and second centuries C.E., there were references to miraculous works performed by Jesus. Clearly, we have every reason to view the Gospel accounts of his miracles as authentic.

The Man Behind the Miracles
An examination of Jesus' miracles would be incomplete were it to be limited to logical arguments about their authenticity. In describing Jesus' powerful works, the Gospels reveal a man of deep feelings and unrivaled compassion, with a keen interest in the welfare of fellow humans.

Consider the case of a leper who approached Jesus with the desperate plea: "If you just want to, you can make me clean." "Moved with pity," Jesus reached out and touched the leper, saying: "I want to. Be made clean." The man was instantly healed. (Mark 1:40-42) Jesus thus demonstrated the empathy that moved him to use his God-given power to perform miracles.

What happened when Jesus met up with a funeral procession coming out of the city of Nain? The deceased young man was the only son of a widow. "Moved with pity" for the woman, Jesus approached her and said: "Stop weeping." Then he raised her son back to life.—Luke 7:11-15.

A comforting lesson that can be drawn from Jesus' miracles is that he was "moved with pity" and did things to help people. But such miracles are not mere history. "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today, and forever," says Hebrews 13:8. He now rules as heavenly King, ready and able to use his God-given miraculous powers in a far grander way than he did when on earth as a human. Soon, Jesus will use them to heal obedient mankind.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#2
If one makes an extraordinary claim of any sort, nobody will allow him to use his own claim as a proof that this claim is true

Oddly enough, that's what happens with Christianity

The only accounts of those miracles are found in the Bible. Miracle do not occur today neither have they occurred ever since the text was written

They have most certainly not occurred for 99.999995% of the history of the Earth (1 - 2000/4.5 billion)

any objective analyzer will just laugh at the a hypothesis that those "miracles" really happened or they were really miracles
 
Nov 10, 2004
993
0
0
#5
Umm. Sorry didn't read that rule. Anywayz, been on that site lately and I've found some pretty interesting and convincing material. Why diss it just because it's Jehovah's Witnesses? It all seems pretty straight to me.
 

Mike Manson

Still Livin'
Apr 16, 2005
8,998
19,414
113
44
#7
If one makes an extraordinary claim of any sort, nobody will allow him to use his own claim as a proof that this claim is true

Oddly enough, that's what happens with Christianity

The only accounts of those miracles are found in the Bible. Miracle do not occur today neither have they occurred ever since the text was written

They have most certainly not occurred for 99.999995% of the history of the Earth (1 - 2000/4.5 billion)

any objective analyzer will just laugh at the a hypothesis that those "miracles" really happened or they were really miracles
I think "The Life Of Brian" pretty much sums up how miracles work...
 
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
44
#8
"Neither could later detractors successfully deny Jesus' miracles"

Oh damn, I can't disprove the occurance of miracles supposedly performed a few thousand years ago. Well, that's it then - Jesus obviously exists. Another illuminating article choc-full of comedy.

Not to worry - I'm done with God-bashing - the whole argument has had far too much airtime over the past few years. Athiests have torn believers stories and 'facts' to shreds, believers consistently fall back on their 'believe he doesn't exist' or 'that's why it's called faith' arguments. Not trying to sound nasty, that's just how it is. If someone cares enough about the topic to read an article putting forth someones opinion, then they've more than likely already formed their own opinion.