SEATTLE GOT ROBBED

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#42
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#42
I do agree, seattle was robbed, no reasons needed, because if ur reading this, u prolly saw the game
 
D-Menace

D-Menace

Sicc OG
#44
May 13, 2002
7,246
0
0
43
#44
T-Rip said:
Everyone can cry and rant all they want but the game should have ended up being a blow out, Yes a couple calls didnt go your way so what

Steelers had 75 yard run for a td longest in superbowl history, then yall fall for the okey doke on that randel el touchdown pass, you give up 2 plays like those you dont deserve to win.
Click to expand...

real spilllins
 
Dirty Shoez

Dirty Shoez

Sicc OG
#45
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
42
www.myspace.com
#45
D'struction said:
They mighta outplayed them, but they still got BEAT. You think that never happens or something???
and how was that not offensive pass interference?? Did you watch the replays??
The R-Burger TD was indeed a touchdown too...and they had no evidence showing that it wasn't. Too close to overturn.
I knew that if Seattle lost, there would be many a people talkin shit about the officiating, but damn suck it up yall, a lot of teams lose their first trip to the Super Bowl, and Seattle wasn't some superteam or something.
Click to expand...

EAZY LOCZ = SUX!!!

NEVER BUYING UR ALBUM EVER, SORRY!!! U SUX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#46
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#46
I am not going to lie... I lost 20 dollaz on the game. But I was betting against the Steelers not the Zebras. If I would of known I was betting against the Zebras I would of taken my money off of the table. There were some very bad calls out there on the refs. Even when they thought Hasselbeck fumbled... the refs were so quick to rule fumble it was funny. They didn't even huddle to talk or nothing.... just fumble. Even though "the ground can't cause a fumble". It's funny how rules apply at certain times. Seattle should of won the game period. Hasselbeck should of been the MVP. He was shredding the Steelers' defense.
 
R

reza

Sicc OG
#47
Jun 9, 2005
573
6
0
#47
The loss of Emmanuel in the Seahawks defense was devastating. That backup, Pruitt, played miserably. He took two bad angles that resulted into Steelers TD. Didn't any of the Seahawks fans recognize that? In five or ten years, these "bad calls" won't be remembered by anyone 'cept for those in Seattle. This superbowl will be looked back as the year the Steelers joined the 'boys and niners as superbowl elites. oh yeah the commericals weren't that great this year.
 
RAS 925

RAS 925

Sicc OG
#51
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#51
Tony said:
I am not going to lie... I lost 20 dollaz on the game. But I was betting against the Steelers not the Zebras. If I would of known I was betting against the Zebras I would of taken my money off of the table. There were some very bad calls out there on the refs. Even when they thought Hasselbeck fumbled... the refs were so quick to rule fumble it was funny. They didn't even huddle to talk or nothing.... just fumble. Even though "the ground can't cause a fumble". It's funny how rules apply at certain times. Seattle should of won the game period. Hasselbeck should of been the MVP. He was shredding the Steelers' defense.
Click to expand...
heh about the zebras and the bad calls.... now u know what us Raider fans gotta go thru damn near every game
 
xpanther206

xpanther206

Sicc OG
#53
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#53
The officials literally lost the game for them. LITERALLY. The Steelers matched every costly mistake the Seahawks made with one of their own EXCEPT for the penalties (three of which were flat out rejected by Hall of Famers on TV both when it happened and at halftime)

The officials cost the Seahawks 15 points (or 11 if you think Roethlisberger either got in or they would've pounded it in on 4th and Goal from the 1 Inch line). And if you are going to reject this 15-point claim, come knowing the specific plays I am alluding to.

A lot of people agree with me:

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

Exhibit C
 
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#54
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
44
#54
for real this game felt like a wildcard playoff game, Steelers did there damn thing but this has got to be the least i looked forward to any superbowl. I still feel the Steelers would have lost to the Bengals if Carson Palmer didnt get hurt cuz the Bengals were on fire and i dont think any defense could have stopped them, only way they would have lost is if they got outplayed offensively by the colts or some other team.
 
F

Fucky McFuckerson

Sicc OG
#56
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#56
D'struction said:
The R-Burger TD was indeed a touchdown too...and they had no evidence showing that it wasn't. Too close to overturn..
Click to expand...
The point is...they should have ruled DOWN..not a TOUCHDOWN...and the same applies...they didnt have any evidence to over rule it...didnt you see the line ump running up VERY unsure whether he was in or not???Exactly...

Im not gonna make any excuses...we lost...oh well..next year is another year....and well be back there before the Steelers will...

See you next year NFL...we mad as fuck now!!!!
 
S

sCiEnTisT925

Sicc OG
#58
Dec 31, 2005
1,273
0
0
#58
its the damn superbowl how could u not expect refs to be a little bias on some plays but overall it was a pretty good game i think that steelers would have won no matter what they just seemed like the team overall was better
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom