Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion)

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#61
@HERESY - I have asked you about your views on religion and evolution, you have never answered

Do you believe in theistic evolution, in young Earth creationism, old Earth creationism or anything else? I am still waiting for an answer and I doubt I'll ever get it. All I see from you is negative posts against atheism, but I haven't heard a single positive statement regarding you views.

That's why you are one big hypocrite
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#62
@HERESY - I have asked you about your views on religion and evolution, you have never answered
This is not true.

Do you believe in theistic evolution, in young Earth creationism, old Earth creationism or anything else?
So we are clear, I'll let you go ahead and define those terms then I'll tell you which one, if any, I endorse.

I am still waiting for an answer and I doubt I'll ever get it.
You are still waiting on an answer? Besides just now when have you EVER asked me that question? I don't recall you EVER asking me about my views on that topic, so how could you still be waiting on anything? LMAO! :confused:

All I see from you is negative posts against atheism
Yet I said your second master is very articulate, and show me where I said anything negative about atheism? What I do is say negative things about ATHEISTS, but you don't see me sayin anything about atheism, because time and time again I have said I DON'T CARE if you believe in God or not.

but I haven't heard a single positive statement regarding you views.
I've made my views known a gazillion times on this board, and I've made them known in several threads were I have made you my bitch.

That's why you are one big hypocrite
Stop confusing me with Dawkins.

Now give your definition of the terms you provided so I can give you an answer, and after that I want you to go on about your business, because you've already lost all cred. You killed yourself with the "no sane person...." statement and basically admit to not being sane, so this convo between us will be over as soon as you provide the definitions and I provide you with an answer.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#64
HERESY said:
This is not true.



So we are clear, I'll let you go ahead and define those terms then I'll tell you which one, if any, I endorse.



You are still waiting on an answer? Besides just now when have you EVER asked me that question? I don't recall you EVER asking me about my views on that topic, so how could you still be waiting on anything? LMAO! :confused:



Yet I said your second master is very articulate, and show me where I said anything negative about atheism? What I do is say negative things about ATHEISTS, but you don't see me sayin anything about atheism, because time and time again I have said I DON'T CARE if you believe in God or not.



I've made my views known a gazillion times on this board, and I've made them known in several threads were I have made you my bitch.



Stop confusing me with Dawkins.

Now give your definition of the terms you provided so I can give you an answer, and after that I want you to go on about your business, because you've already lost all cred. You killed yourself with the "no sane person...." statement and basically admit to not being sane, so this convo between us will be over as soon as you provide the definitions and I provide you with an answer.

more of the same....

cop-out after cop-out
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#65
So we are clear, I'll let you go ahead and define those terms then I'll tell you which one, if any, I endorse
Now give your definition of the terms you provided so I can give you an answer, and after that I want you to go on about your business
See folks, he calls me a hypocrite and says I won't answer him. So we would be on the same page, I asked him to DEFINE the terms that HE introduced and said TWICE that I would answer his questions. What does he do? :dead:

Get the fuck out of here bitch. :dead:
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#67
I just gave you a chance to have your questions answered and you blew it. Kick rocks man. And giving me a link to something you probably haven't even read is not going to work. Someone introduced HYPOCRITE to this thread, and what did that person do? For clarification purposes they defined the terms. I asked you to do it and you REFUSED, and now when I point it out you want to provide me with wikipedia links.

Get lost man.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#68
HERESY said:
Now give your definition of the terms you provided so I can give you an answer, and after that I want you to go on about your business, because you've already lost all cred. You killed yourself with the "no sane person...." statement and basically admit to not being sane, so this convo between us will be over as soon as you provide the definitions and I provide you with an answer.
I am waiting...
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#69
HERESY said:
I just gave you a chance to have your questions answered and you blew it. Kick rocks man. And giving me a link to something you probably haven't even read is not going to work. Someone introduced HYPOCRITE to this thread, and what did that person do? For clarification purposes they defined the terms. I asked you to do it and you REFUSED, and now when I point it out you want to provide me with wikipedia links.

Get lost man.
BUMP
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#71
I gave you the definitions which, if you really have read as much as you claim to have, you should be already familiar with, and we're again in the same situation as before

BTW I have asked you about you opinions at least twice and you're straight LYING by teliing you don't remember that. Well, it seems I have a better memory than you

I do not expect to receive any kind of definitive answer from you anyway, it is not possible for you to do it without making yourslef a laughing stock, so you'll keep avoiding answering questions
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#72
I'll try to be more precise:

1. Do you believe the Earth was created 6000 years ago?

or

2. Do you accept the scientific estimate of 4.6 billions?

3. Do you think God created everything on this planet exactly as it's written in the Bible (in 6 days) or you think it was not meant to be read literally?

or

4. Do you think God created life by directing evolution?

I want answers to these, then I'll ask some more depending on the answers I receive
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#73
Listen, the convo between you and myself is FINISHED.

You said you asked me questions, but there was no proof of you ever asking me any questions.

You introduced terms and I told you to provide the definitions for these terms so that we were on the same page and told you I would answer them and I said that TWICE.

Instead of defining the terms you came back and said, "more of the same....
cop-out after cop-out", so that leads me to believe that you NEVER wanted an answer but want to go back and forth because you are lonely.

From here on out you can't use the "he never answers" line because I gave you a chance to get an asnwer and you didn't jump on it.

Good day man, this convo between you and myself is finished.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#76
I'll try to be more precise:

1. Do you believe the Earth was created 6000 years ago?

or

2. Do you accept the scientific estimate of 4.6 billions?

3. Do you think God created everything on this planet exactly as it's written in the Bible (in 6 days) or you think it was not meant to be read literally?

or

4. Do you think God created life by directing evolution?

I want answers to these, then I'll ask some more depending on the answers I receive
....
 
Mar 26, 2006
3,502
17
38
45
#79
From my readings of the Bible, there are plenty of inconsistencies, especially between the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament. The latter shows himself to be more loving and -- if you still believe there's a God -- one that would be of much benefit in today's world that still clings on to waging war and killing men, women, and children. Yet, what do so-called "Christians" continue to push?

Religion ironically does sometimes blind people to doing what's actually right: following the Golden Rule. You treat others with respect and you tend to show kindness towards others. You don't need to have a degree in theology to know that; you just need to be human. Therefore, terrorism, i.e., blind faith, cannot take root. 9/11 would never happen. Similar blind faith justifying the Iraq War that managed to kill tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians (probably well over a hundred thousand) would be deemed irrational and exceptionally cruel. The Middle East conflicts would be manageable.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if everyone forget religion for ONE day and remember how we played together when we were children? Yes, fights do break out but they don't last and overall we got along. Like it or not, we're stuck with each other and the sooner we learn how to play nice, the sooner we can build some really cool toys -- together. As a great book once taught us, "Even a child is known by his doings, whether his work be pure, and whether it be right."