Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
37
#22
I don't know why the Fuck any of you would say Fuck Jews, there are different types of Jews for you ignorant people. Watch one day, you'll see the Jews Retake their land. Secondly, what Hemp said, is partially true, ok peace now.

I know Most of America's News is Pro-Zionist and Anti-muslim at more times than other, which I'm against. But what about Al-Jazeera? I'm on no ones side when it comes to Zionists or Muslim Extremists but either way, both sides are the same.

Just like Democrats and Republicans, is there really any difference between both sides agenda? Nope
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#23
There are many Jews who regard Arabs as less than human.

That said, there are ridiculous views, stories, and ideas put forth about Jews that are popularized and accepted in the Arab world. From listening to Arab media, you would think Jews cause everything from bad weather to syphilis...

The state run media in several countries is especially ridiculous in regards to this issue.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,001
86
48
#25
I'll play Israel for a second...

"fuck them, they can't have nukes, LET'S NUKE THEM!"

What kind of fucking stupid worthless pieces of shit are these people? Do they inbreed and fuck themselves all day long? They should be fucking nuked themselves.

and Hemp, not all muslim's hate non-muslims...only the EXTREME ones do...because they are taught in MADRAS, which are like private Christian schools over here...only there, they teach them about the fucking Jihad, and to bomb mother fuckers. And I'm not going to debate you if you try to say, "well those people aren't Muslims if they don't hate all non-Muslims" because that's the stupidest shit I've ever heard...

STOCKTONE said:
But what about Al-Jazeera? I'm on no ones side when it comes to Zionists or Muslim Extremists but either way, both sides are the same.

Just like Democrats and Republicans, is there really any difference between both sides agenda? Nope
Have you been reading my book or something?
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#28
INPUT said:
"well those people aren't Muslims if they don't hate all non-Muslims" because that's the stupidest shit I've ever heard...
thats what i was taught.
once i was even tellin my mom and her friend about how if i unconditionally love everybody then i will be happy all the time. they were like WHATT NO dont love the blasphemers you cant.
they aint extremists one bit and believe women and children cant be killed, etc, pretty peaceful muslims.


Edj: i think i remember the reason being God claiming to hate nonbelievers in the quran, not sure tho would have to check this info out
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,001
86
48
#29
Just cause you're taught something, doesn't mean it's right or true, come on now.

That's like a kid who's dad is in the KKK and is taught to hate everyone that's not white...

And why does it matter what OTHER people think? Don't let them run your life, do what you do. If you want to care about people who are "blasphemers" then do it, the only people trippin are the ones who want you to THINK LIKE THEY DO....

BTW, what religion to you affiliate with (if any)?
 

Hutch

Sicc OG
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
45
#31
nhojsmith said:
absolutely not. where would you even begin to draw the line.
There is no specific line separating good from bad, from responsible to non-responsible - there are several shades of grey. Do you know you can go to jail for standing there and watching someone get bashed to death, even though you were in no way involved? The fact is, you sat back and let it happen so it is partly your fault. If you had done something, that person may still be alive. If the US had never given Israel any nuclear weapons, and if they didn't finance their war efforts, then Israel wouldn't be threatening to drop nukes on Iran. Therefore, the US is partly responsible for whatever happens, like it or not.
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#32
INPUT said:
Just cause you're taught something, doesn't mean it's right or true, come on now.

That's like a kid who's dad is in the KKK and is taught to hate everyone that's not white...

And why does it matter what OTHER people think? Don't let them run your life, do what you do. If you want to care about people who are "blasphemers" then do it, the only people trippin are the ones who want you to THINK LIKE THEY DO....

BTW, what religion to you affiliate with (if any)?

i know that just cause i was taught something it dont mean its true, but that goes for anybody being taught anything.
if its a religious matter then whos to say whats right or wrong.

now i dont let ppl run my life but as a "muslim" you must NEVER go against your religion, or else.
and my family are the pious type, but not fanatics so they constantly have an eye out for any wrongdoing or wrong speech.

i dont affiliate with any religion, i am a follower of the same way thats taught by most. that is to do good, be good, love all, etc etc, and if i follow all of those things while never intentionally causing harm then theres no way i can be tortured for eternity unless the God was a dictator.
 

Hutch

Sicc OG
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
45
#33
Hemp said:
i know that just cause i was taught something it dont mean its true, but that goes for anybody being taught anything.
if its a religious matter then whos to say whats right or wrong.
Well said. If you want to get close to the truth, you have to assess the evidence independently and then come up with your own conclusions. When it comes to arguments that have no evidence, either for or against (as in the case for religion), then you cannot justify your belief in one God more than any other God. Arguments between religions all stem from fiction, not fact.

The kid who was brought up in the KKK and was taught to hate everyone who is not white needs to study physiology and evolution (everyones the same), history and psychology etc. Eventually, if he's intelligent enough, he'll realise that the factors contributing to his hate for non-white people are literally skin deep. He can then come to an independent conclusion, based on evidence, as to why it is wrong to hate non-white people (his stupidity and subjective interpretation of such evidence may alter his conclusions though).

Do you see the difference between the two cases? With the KKK follower, if he just took the time, he could easily characterise what's wrong with racism. Nearly every other argument can be solved by objective analysis of evidence. The one case where this reasoning doesn't apply is religion (remember, there is no evidence). Therefore, regardless of what anyone says or does, Muslims and Jews will continue to hate each other (for the most part) based on fallicious teachings and biast beliefs. Prove that Muslims are wrong - you can't. Prove that Jews are wrong - you can't. Therefore, they're both right :dead:
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#34
HYPHYHYPHERS said:
IT AIN'T A SECRET ANYMORE...WHY THA FUCK WOULD YOU TELL THE MEDIA WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO BEFORE YOU DO IT????

propaganda?
to establish the fact that it IS gonna happen?
many reasons mayne.
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#35
Hutch said:
Do you see the difference between the two cases? With the KKK follower, if he just took the time, he could easily characterise what's wrong with racism. Nearly every other argument can be solved by objective analysis of evidence. The one case where this reasoning doesn't apply is religion (remember, there is no evidence). Therefore, regardless of what anyone says or does, Muslims and Jews will continue to hate each other (for the most part) based on fallicious teachings and biast beliefs. Prove that Muslims are wrong - you can't. Prove that Jews are wrong - you can't. Therefore, they're both right :dead:

exactly.
Especially when each of them are warned by their religion of those who will try to convince them or those who actually do convince them; the devil; stay away.

its sad that they cannot understand that the same way they feel as they are right and know truth and understand that the other is bs is all ways.

shoowilla is never gonna be a christian and heresy will never be a muslim.
now tell me do you think with both of these guys' intentions , does any of them deserve an eternal punishment?
or are they both just wanting to find truth and workin hard towards what they believe they found to be the truth?
this question is for whoever want to answer, im just explaining myself to those who despise my actions and think im ignorant.
 
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
46
#36
There is some outrageous ignorance and blind hate in this thread....

This thread is like a dumb magnet; attracting a whole bunch of stupid shit....
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#37
JoMoDo said:
There is some outrageous ignorance and blind hate in this thread....

This thread is like a dumb magnet; attracting a whole bunch of stupid shit....

why waste your energy and not clarify?
would you like us to ask?
ok im asking.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,001
86
48
#38
Hutch, maybe they're both wrong. At least, that's my take on it. Anyone that kills someone else because of something they believe, is a worthless piece of shit, I think any sensible human being that cares about humanity would understand that. However, as I've read, a lot of the extremist Muslims are still living in the fucking 13th Century, and they seem to like it like that (because they had control of a ton of shit).

There are things such as crimes against humanity. However, I think Israel is just as guilty as anyone else, they're all guilty by association. Like you said Hutch, if you stand by while someone is getting beatin to death, or while someone is drowning, you can be held accountable for NOT doing something to prevent the situation...

Take a look at what the news said Osama said...if the American people take back the gov't and country, he ain't trippin...which means, that if the American people actually fucking understood what was going on and did something about it (like they use to before everyone got lazy) then part of the problem would be solved.

I honestly think that all these countries are fucking ignorant but that's just me. Killing people over anything ain't worth it. If someone kills your homey, revenge might be your thing, but then you're still a murdering son of a bitch like dude who killed your homey...the only way you can stay away from that is by being the bigger person and not going to his house and pulling out a pistol when he opens the door and blasting him. In case nobody can tell, I'm referring to the US being "attacked" (yeah right) on 9/11 then going to Iraq, like they had any fucking thing to do with it. Now most people don't even consider that.

This fucking country (and world) makes me fucking sick. I almost think everyone would be better off dead, but I'm not one to make that decision.
 
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#39
Hutch said:
Do you know you can go to jail for standing there and watching someone get bashed to death, even though you were in no way involved? The fact is, you sat back and let it happen so it is partly your fault.
this is ridiculous as is the good samaritan law. but you bring up an interesting point. using your very line of reasoning most hawks could say our invasion of iraq and the proposal to attack iran can simply be chalked up to not sitting back and letting whatever their idea of wrong is to propagate.
 

Hutch

Sicc OG
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
45
#40
nhojsmith said:
this is ridiculous as is the good samaritan law. but you bring up an interesting point. using your very line of reasoning most hawks could say our invasion of iraq and the proposal to attack iran can simply be chalked up to not sitting back and letting whatever their idea of wrong is to propagate.
Not quite. That would suggest that, instead of you going to jail for sitting back and watching someone beat another man to death, you would attack the perpetrator before he had the chance to beat the other man to death. In other words, you would be violent against this man when he has done nothing wrong - you would be fully at fault. I cannot justify killing someone because they might kill me, something that Israel is trying to (we have to nuke them now because if we don't, they might develop weapons later on and nuke us). That's not a justifiable argument!

Edit: By the way, the same argument can be used in favour of Iran - they may consider the development of nuclear weapons essential to the defense of their country against western interests - "If we don't develop weapons now, then the US will just walk in and take our oil". That would be very wrong in Irans eyes. It's all subjective.