RAIDERS CUT COLLINS!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
3,020
2
38
#21
thascary1 said:
I agree Walters could be good, but there will still be the learning curve, he will not be much next year, which could hurt free agent signings later.
Thats why I wouldn't mind starting him as soon as possible. I dont think they will finish above .500 next season anyway so might as well start building for the future now.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#22
thascary1 said:
I hear what your saying but like your post says all that available is maybe Brees or Young, and slim chance of Culpepper.


Culpepper---Moss and Culp...need we say more as it worked so well the first time.
QUOTE]


I'M CONFUSED..ARE YOU BEING SARCASTIC HERE? IT MIGHT'VE ENDED BITTERLY AS MOSS WAS BEING A BIT OF A WR DIVA.. BUT FOR THE MOST PART THEIR RELATIONSHIP WAS ONE OF CONSTANT SUCCESS. THE STATS AND PRO-BOWLS BACK THAT UP. BELIEVE ME, IT COULD BE WORKED OUT.

CHREE- WHERE DID YOU HEAR THAT CULLPEPPER WAS OFF THE MARKET?

DAMN!
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#24
ANDREW WALTER WAS DEFINITELY A SOLID INVESTMENT.. BUT HE HAS APPEARED TO BE A LITTLE INJURY PRONE..

HE IS A GREAT # 2 IF HE CAN STAY HEALTHY. I WOULDN'T EXPECT HIM TO BRING US INTO PLAYOFF CONTENTION. THAT TUIASOSOPO GUY IS HORRIBLE.

MY PREDICTION:

DREW BREES SIGNS FOR A REASONABLE PRICE DUE TO QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS SHOULDER AND WE GET A COUPLE SOLID DEFENSIVE PLAYERS. HOPEFULLY A SAVAGE VETERAN LB AND A STRONG SAFETY VET.. MAYBE LAWYER MILLOY?

WISHFULLY THINKING.. I KNOW. I'M SICK OF BEING GARBAGE BACK TO BACK YEARS..

WE'RE DESTINED FOR GREATNESS AGAIN.. IT'S INEVITABLE!
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#27
damn that sucks for yall raiders, but, i bet he gets the official axe lol, the vikes owner said he is willing to give culpepper a raise, look it up
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#29
iono bout all that, lol, raiders got no D now, what is Danny Clark and Burgess gonna do by themselves? sure u can say the same about us, but we have Ulbrich, Young, Parrish, Mike Adams (ull know bout him soon) locked up, along with having a great chance at resigning Derek Smith, Andre Carter, and Brandon Moore
 
Jun 16, 2002
318
21
0
123
#30
Solitary 1 said:
WE'RE IN BETTER SHAPE THAN THE NINERS THOUGH!

HAHA
Niners are in better shape than they were last year, we on the other hand are in worse shape than we were last year. Seeing as how both teams were tied record-wise, I'd say we are in worse shape than the Niners. At least they have cap room to pick up some good help.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#31
Chree said:
iono bout all that, lol, raiders got no D now, what is Danny Clark and Burgess gonna do by themselves? sure u can say the same about us, but we have Ulbrich, Young, Parrish, Mike Adams (ull know bout him soon) locked up, along with having a great chance at resigning Derek Smith, Andre Carter, and Brandon Moore

YOU GUYS ARE IN BETTER SHAPE OVER-ALL DEFENSIVELY.. BUT DERRICK BURGESS IS SHITTING ON YOUR ENTIRE DEFENSIVE ROSTER.

YOUR OFFENSE IS PATHETIC. ALEX SMITH IS HORRIBLE AND WILL CONTINUE TO REMIND YOU OF THAT ALL NEXT SEASON. LLOYD IS GOOD AT BEST AND WHO THE HELL IS YOUR RUNNING BACK GOING TO BE?

YOU GUYS ARE WAY BEHIND US IN TERMS OF REBUILDING AND THAT'S MY POINT.

WE GOT A WAYS TO GO AS WELL...
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#32
BTW- WE GOT WEAPONS ON OFFENSIVE. EASILY ONE OF THE MOST POTENT IN THE LEAGUE SO I DON'T NEED TO NAME NAMES. WE DO NEED SOMEBODY BETTER THAN KC AT QB THOUGH...
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#33
Solitary 1 said:
YOU GUYS ARE IN BETTER SHAPE OVER-ALL DEFENSIVELY.. BUT DERRICK BURGESS IS SHITTING ON YOUR ENTIRE DEFENSIVE ROSTER.

YOUR OFFENSE IS PATHETIC. ALEX SMITH IS HORRIBLE AND WILL CONTINUE TO REMIND YOU OF THAT ALL NEXT SEASON. LLOYD IS GOOD AT BEST AND WHO THE HELL IS YOUR RUNNING BACK GOING TO BE?

YOU GUYS ARE WAY BEHIND US IN TERMS OF REBUILDING AND THAT'S MY POINT.

WE GOT A WAYS TO GO AS WELL...
Well I have to take the niners side on this....and that hurts me...lol

they have an overall better defense.

they actually have a qb on the roster with playing time under his belt

free agent rb's are a dime a dozen this year, they can go get Jamal or Edge with the cap room they have!!
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#34
Solitary 1 said:
BTW- WE GOT WEAPONS ON OFFENSIVE. EASILY ONE OF THE MOST POTENT IN THE LEAGUE SO I DON'T NEED TO NAME NAMES. WE DO NEED SOMEBODY BETTER THAN KC AT QB THOUGH...
weapons on offense?

are you talking about the same "weapons" that finsihed the last 8 games:

Sun 11/13 Denver L 17-31
Sun 11/20 at Washington W 16-13
Sun 11/27 Miami L 21-33
Sun 12/4 at San Diego L 10-34
Sun 12/11 at NY Jets L 10-26
Sun 12/18 Cleveland L 7-9
Sat 12/24 at Denver L 3-22
Sat 12/31 NY Giants L 21-30


that's 105 in 8 games or better yet 13 a game......weapons galore!! lol
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#35
thascary1 said:
weapons on offense?

are you talking about the same "weapons" that finsihed the last 8 games:

Sun 11/13 Denver L 17-31
Sun 11/20 at Washington W 16-13
Sun 11/27 Miami L 21-33
Sun 12/4 at San Diego L 10-34
Sun 12/11 at NY Jets L 10-26
Sun 12/18 Cleveland L 7-9
Sat 12/24 at Denver L 3-22
Sat 12/31 NY Giants L 21-30


that's 105 in 8 games or better yet 13 a game......weapons galore!! lol
and that was with playing the powerhouse d's of jets and cleveland
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#36
thascary1 said:
and that was with playing the powerhouse d's of jets and cleveland


DON'T ACT DUMBER THAN YOU ARE. THOSE STATS ARE MIS-LEADING. WE HAD A HORRIBLE QB. WE HAVE WEAPONS ON OFFENSE. YOU KNOW IT AND I KNOW IT.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#37
Solitary 1 said:
DON'T ACT DUMBER THAN YOU ARE. THOSE STATS ARE MIS-LEADING. WE HAD A HORRIBLE QB. WE HAVE WEAPONS ON OFFENSE. YOU KNOW IT AND I KNOW IT.

and a new qb with zero experience will be better than a qb that had years of playing time?

And even if you find a qb thaths half way decent the final score will no longer be 31-17 or 34-10 they will be 31 - 24 or 34 - 28

they still have no d.


No matter how good of an offense you have the past few years have shown you need an D to compete.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#38
OF COURSE... CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF.. ALL WE NEED IS A COUPLE OF KEY AQUISITIONS (A COUPLE NEW LB'S, SS'S) ON OUR DEFENSE.. AND IT WILL BE MORE THAN ENOUGH..

BTW EVERY THE NINERS HAVE NOW IS TOTAL GARBAGE.

WHO ARE YOU REFERRING TO?
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#39
Solitary 1 said:
OF COURSE... CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF.. ALL WE NEED IS A COUPLE OF KEY AQUISITIONS (A COUPLE NEW LB'S, SS'S) ON OUR DEFENSE.. AND IT WILL BE MORE THAN ENOUGH..

BTW EVERY THE NINERS HAVE NOW IS TOTAL GARBAGE.

WHO ARE YOU REFERRING TO?

and the money for those players is coming from where?