Raiders are by far and away best afc west team right now but...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
ESCOBAR 92113

ESCOBAR 92113

BARRIO LOGAN
#141
Oct 31, 2003
4,485
824
0
48
SAN DIEGO
SOUTHEASTSANDIEGO.COM
#141
ant_johnson_16 said:
You're making excuses for your team sucking. You went 2-8 vs. everyone else because you suck. Man up and take it on the chin. We made less mistakes and won more games. Thats why you faggots are at home.

Yea we won games we shoulda lost, thats what good teams do. We also lost several we should've won. So dont act like we're a fluke and luck was on our side all season because that couldnt be further from the truth.
Click to expand...
my team is FAR from sucking.....#1 offense and #1 defense statistically in the league. We owned this division for awhile now. We used 72 different players this season due to injury and still had a wining season. That shows the type of depth we have, in the end we gave away too many games to overcome our slow start. Im not saying you guys are a fluke, i understand youre feeling really good right now but lets not carried away. By the way, im not a raider fan, i hate them with a passion. But as a football fan im calling it how i see it, unfortunately for you most people outside to the chief fan base see it the same way
 
TheVille31

TheVille31

Sicc OG
#143
Oct 24, 2002
9,569
38
48
39
www.beekc.com
#143
Solitary 1 said:
No matter how YOU look at it, when the Raiders played the Chiefs, the RAIDERS were the better team.

That's all facts.
Click to expand...
no matter how you look at it we are in the playoffs.

no matter how you look at it we own the all time series record.

no matter how you look at it going 6-0 in the division doesnt mean shit.

no matter how you look at it Jamaal is better than DMC.

no matter how you look at it we have a better qb.

no matter how you look at it we have a coach.

should i go on?


Im seriously getting pissed cause i think its so funny that you guys are trying to justify a .500 season on beating us twice. It really baffles me.

I understand our rivalry but man up and admit when your wrong. I do it all the time cause im not gonna try to justify my team being shitty. (lucky for us though the only respectable raiders fans

Its like the royals beat the yankees in the series a couple years ago. Who gives a shit? We beat them but we didnt make the playoffs and thats all that really matters.
 
Solitary 1

Solitary 1

Moderator
#145
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#145
TheVille31 said:
Im seriously getting pissed.
Click to expand...

Yes. We can all tell. You're sensitive.

No matter how you look at it, WE SWEPT YOU.

No matter how you look at it we've beat YOU 4 STRAIGHT TIMES AT HOME

No matter how you look at it - Matt Cassell got EXPOSED for being an average ass SYSTEM QB by the Raiders Defense.. Ran around spooked for the entire game and threw 2 INT'S. No TD's

No matter how you look at it McFadden is better than Charles. He's scored more TD's this season and is the better all around player.

No matter how you look at it - your Offensive Coordinator is GONE

No matter how you look at it The Raiders are an official DYNASTY and the Chiefs haven't won a SB since WOODSTOCK.

Should I go on?

Congrats on making the playoffs.. But the Raiders are the better team. We proved it we went toe to toe and BITCHSLAPPED your faggot ass team at HOME.
 
Meta4iCAL

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
#147
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
39
#147
Big Bhree said:
The O line has been the best for the raiders in the past 4-5 years. Offensive Lines was his specialty and they held up pretty well, even a B grade is better than years past. U cant pin the run games success on Hue Jackson for the most part, The Offensive line opened holes and held up for deep passes to get thrown
Click to expand...
the O-line did better this year when we implemented more power blocking with Jackson's system, as opposed to zone blocking with Cable's system

not saying Cable shouldn't get any credit for the O-line... but he shouldn't get all of it
 
ArGenTin3

ArGenTin3

Sicc OG
#153
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
46
#153
Solitary 1 said:
No matter how you look at it McFadden is better than Charles.
Click to expand...
hell nah.

our offensive line is average at best and he still managed to almost break the alltime record of 6.4 ypc record held by jim brown this season. ain't no way in hell mcfadden is better then charles.

only raider/arkansas fans believe that.
 
CHAPO GUZMAN

CHAPO GUZMAN

Sicc OG
#154
Jan 5, 2006
13,536
3,427
0
37
#154
Solitary 1 said:
No matter how you look at it McFadden is better than Charles. He's scored more TD's this season and is the better all around player.
Click to expand...
Good one! McFadden IS NOT better, and whats even more funny is McFadden has had more fumbles his his career, he's a no.1 RB, Charles is a no. 2 RB, Charles has more yard per carry in any season.. the first, or this season.. he has more yards per carry than McFadden has had in any season or in his career period.

Here: let's compare numbers shall we? and I dont wanna hear any shit about "Charles has more games under his belt.." not Jamaal's fault McFadden hasn't been healthy...

 
CHAPO GUZMAN

CHAPO GUZMAN

Sicc OG
#156
Jan 5, 2006
13,536
3,427
0
37
#156
You're arguing about 2 more TD's? how about Charles having 300 more Yards on DMC?? 6.4 ypc vs 5.2 ypc.. more yards per game... McFadden loses this battle.. Charles all day any day!
 
Solitary 1

Solitary 1

Moderator
#157
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#157
CHAPO GUZMAN said:
You're arguing about 2 more TD's? how about Charles having 300 more Yards on DMC?? 6.4 ypc vs 5.2 ypc.. more yards per game... McFadden loses this battle.. Charles all day any day!
Click to expand...
Give McFadden another healthy year and you will see....

I'll admit that Charles has better career stats, but that won't last.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom