RACE TO THE CUP

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 15, 2002
2,964
8
0
#21
But look at the rules: if a player's stick is parallel to the ice and he barely touches another player, nine times out of ten it's going to be called a penalty, and nine times out of ten that hook had a negligible effect on the play. When little things like that are allowed, the other team will do the same and they will balance each other out. Blatant penalties, like I mentioned before, like hauling someone down with your stick, or hacking their legs out from under them, or smashing them face first into the boards should be called obviously, but little penalties that have little to no effect on the play or the motion of the game should be ignored. Those little penalties are like driving 2 miles an hour over the speed limit, it makes no difference and authorities should recognize it. Everyone does them, it's just a matter of who gets caught. Plus, those little hooks and holds are what causes tempers to rise, and we all know that makes for good, entertaining hockey. (admit it:))

[I don't know if you've noticed, but the intensity of these playoffs (with a couple of exceptions) is much lower than usual and that's because players are more cautious about what they do because the referees won't lay off and let them play. Usually in hockey playoffs, things pick up, but so far players are playing at the same pace they did during the regular season. It's a little disappointing. But that's not a big issue, I'm sure things will gain momentum.]

Also, that delay of game penalty for hitting the puck directly over the boards is a bad rule, too. It should be automatic for the goalie only, and up to the ref's discretion whether or not a player intentionally did it. After all, almost every single time that occurs, it's an accident. A player can just as easily ice the puck if he wanted a faceoff. And if he is unable to ice the puck, then the ref should be watching out for players purposely hitting the puck over the glass. It's an issue of referee competence.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#22
RedStorm said:
Also, that delay of game penalty for hitting the puck directly over the boards is a bad rule, too. It should be automatic for the goalie only, and up to the ref's discretion whether or not a player intentionally did it. After all, almost every single time that occurs, it's an accident. A player can just as easily ice the puck if he wanted a faceoff. And if he is unable to ice the puck, then the ref should be watching out for players purposely hitting the puck over the glass. It's an issue of referee competence.
Ya, that is a tough one. Now, it is an accident though. Obviously players dont want to do that on purpose, because it is an automatic 2 minutes. Before the rule was stated, players would do it with ease because it ices the rush.

Ya, it has been a pretty quiet post season, other than a couple fights here and there. I agree, the players are cautious.
 
Nov 14, 2002
2,204
0
0
41
#27
I guess it was a good year for me to become an NHL fan. I said it after game 4 that whoever won between the Flames and Ducks would rep the West in the finals, and I'm sticking to it.

Ducks d. Sharks in 7 in the Western finals.
 

Palmer

RIP SouthernComfort
Apr 10, 2006
4,985
4,812
113
40
SEAHAWKS!!!
#28
714KaliHydro said:
Before the rule was stated, players would do it with ease because it ices the rush.
That's exactly why they need the rule. That's also why they added the rule that if you ice the puck you can't make a line change. Too many great momentum plays were coming to end because someone would just throw it down the ice for an icing, or they would flip it over the glass. Now theirs now point becasue you're either taking a penalty or your forced to stay on the ice for another face off. It creates more exciting hockey imo.

Although I will have to agree that all the hooking, and slashing penalties this year were ridiculous. The NHL said they were going to be extremely strict on it this year to get the players adjusted, so hopefully they back off a little next year. It just made for terrible hockey.

Stanley Cup is going to be between Ottawa and Edmonton, and the winner is going to be Ottawa in 6
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#29
^^^

As much as I would like to see the Senators come out on top in the East, I cant see them getting passed the Devils. NJ is solid, and a team that I love to hate.

That would be a greaet match up though (Ottawa vs Edmonton).
 

Palmer

RIP SouthernComfort
Apr 10, 2006
4,985
4,812
113
40
SEAHAWKS!!!
#30
^^^

Yeah you're right, I just want to see a cup go up north (no I'm not Canadian, just love the country), and I can't see Edmonton getting past the Devils. We'll see though the Sens and Devils played 4 games this year with each team winning 2. But we all know how dangerous NJ can be in the playoffs. It should be exciting, and in my opinion it's going to be the series for the Stanly Cup.
 
May 4, 2006
15
0
0
48
#31
i think the sabres are strong enuff to do it this year. they have very strong 4 lines.but the devils are red hot at the moment!
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#33
Here is the line for tommorow:

Outcome Total Money Line
EDMONTON OVER 6.0 +110 +170
SAN JOSE UNDER 6.0 -130 -200

I would think that even in Edmonton, SJ would be about a -110

Yet, I still have faith in Edmonton to pull another upset and become the "Cinderella" team.

PS - Anaheim smashes Colorado 5 to zip.
 
Sep 29, 2003
6,584
54
0
#34
going back about all the penalties and stuff in the new NHL, i dont really like it either. the only reason they call so many is to keep the scoring up to make NHL more exciting and appealing to new fans. i hate when refs call hooking or slashing or tripping calls that are not blatant. players start to take dives to get their team a powerplay, and i feel that because of this, the game is starting to lose integrity....anybody else?

by the way, ottawa does NOT have a very good goaltender, the only way they are winning games is because of their offence. its not very often you lose a game when you score 6 or 8 goals....as far as the western conference goes anaheim is playing very solid, i still cant believe they knocked off my beloved flames. my whole city is mourning the loss, i think we all had high expectations after 2004 playoffs....it was almost as if they threw game 7 and im glad the ducks eliminated them because they sure as hell did not deserve to win playing like that. anyway, with that being said.....

ducks/sharks vs new jersey/ottawa in the finals, and for all the dont-knows carolina just whooped NJ 6-0 last night, but i havent lost faith in brodeur
 
May 27, 2002
2,804
0
0
www.google.com
#35
NHL is losing a little integrity but they have to if they want to draw more fans and more money to keep the league going. Don't know wether it's worked so far but I think there's gonna be more rule changes or change backs next season. This year was almost an experiment.


SHARKS VS EDMONTON AT 5 TODAY!! GO SHARKS!
 

Palmer

RIP SouthernComfort
Apr 10, 2006
4,985
4,812
113
40
SEAHAWKS!!!
#37
Am I the only one that thinks the NHL doesn't need more fans. What I mean is not at the cost of fucking up the game. All these rule changes, for more scoring to bring more fans is just fucking the game up. If they need to fill up the stadiums then they need to get rid of some of these teams in the states and send em back up to Canada. You could put a team in almost any city in Canada and that's shits sellin out every game almost guaranteed.

Or they could go back to old time hockey with bench clearing brawles, and goons that have one job...kick the shit out of people. That's the one rule they need to get rid of, the instigator rule. By doing that their will be more scoring because all the stars will be able to dance more making it easier to score. Plus how many people do you know that know nothing of hockey say they like the sport because of fighting, well more fights more fans (ignorant fans but still more tickets sold).

Sorry all that has nothing to do with Playoff predictions. I'm still going with Ottawa and Edmonton.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#38
MaKaVeLi_420 said:
i still cant believe they knocked off my beloved flames. my whole city is mourning the loss, i think we all had high expectations after 2004 playoffs....it was almost as if they threw game 7 and im glad the ducks eliminated them because they sure as hell did not deserve to win playing like that. anyway, with that being said.....
It was a great series. The Flames have always been intimidating. They are an extremely phsyical team. I think the only thing they are lacking is speed on the ice. The can look fairly sluggish at times, but their good passing tends to make up for it.

Anaheim goes into Colorado up 2-0
 
Sep 29, 2003
6,584
54
0
#40
714KaliHydro said:
It was a great series. The Flames have always been intimidating. They are an extremely phsyical team. I think the only thing they are lacking is speed on the ice. The can look fairly sluggish at times, but their good passing tends to make up for it.

Anaheim goes into Colorado up 2-0
yea but they just didnt show up game 7, they were fanning on the puck, missing passes, just dumping it into the zone and not giving chase, it was horrible. the game was full of turnovers. i think you are right about speed, they were a little worn out probably. they need to get rid of some older players like amonte for one, and get some draft picks...