DUTCH-F.E said:
ebonics is a "slave tongue"??? t cash you have lost your got-damned mind...... whats poppin is a slave tongue? fa-sho is slave tongue? holla at me later is slave tongue... get the fuck outta here...... you guys and this fuck the white man at all cost bullshit kill me. hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
now cause im white i have to replace my "a"'s at the end of words like mothafucka with "er" cause im white. you are so bogus.
Ebonics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For African American U.S. English that is distinctly non-standard U.S. English, see African American Vernacular English.
Ebonics, a portmanteau of "ebony" and "phonics", was originally intended and sometimes used for the language of all people of African ancestry, or for that of Black North American and West African people, emphasizing the African roots of the former; since 1996 it has been largely used to refer to African American Vernacular English (distinctively nonstandard Black United States English), emphasizing the independence of the latter from (standard) English.
Contents
[hide]
1 Ebonics as first intended
2 Ebonics in an exclusively U.S. context
3 Notes
4 References
5 External links
[edit]Ebonics as first intended
What is claimed to be the initial mention of "Ebonics" was made by the psychologist[1] Robert Williams in a dialogue with Ernie Smith that took place in a conference on "Cognitive and Language Development of the Black Child", held in St. Louis, Missouri, in 1973.[2] In 1975 it appeared within the title and text of a book edited and co-written by Williams, Ebonics: The True Language of Black Folks. Williams there explains it:
A two-year-old term created by a group of black scholars, Ebonics may be defined as "the linguistic and paralinguistic features which on a concentric continuum represent the communicative competence of the West African, Caribbean, and United States slave descendant of African origin. It includes the various idioms, patois, argots, idiolects, and social dialects of black people" especially those who have adapted to colonial circumstances. Ebonics derives its form from ebony (black) and phonics (sound, the study of sound) and refers to the study of the language of black people in all its cultural uniqueness.[3]
Other writers have since emphasized how the term represents a view of the language of Black Americans as African rather than European.[4] The term was not obviously popular even among those who agreed with the reason for coining it: it is little used even within the Ebonics book, in which "Black English" is the far commoner name.[5]
John Baugh claims[6] that the term Ebonics is used in four ways by its Afrocentric proponents. Two refer to the languages of the African diaspora as a whole.[7] Two others correspond to English: one "is the equivalent of black English and is considered to be a dialect of English", the other "is the antonym of black English and is considered to be a language other than English".[8]
[edit]Ebonics in an exclusively U.S. context
For more details on this topic, see African American Vernacular English.
Ebonics remained a little known and little remarked term until 1996; it does not appear within the second edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, published in 1989 and thus over a decade after it was coined, and it was not used by linguists.[9]
In 1996, the term became widely known in the U.S. thanks to its use by the Oakland School Board to denote and recognize the primary language (or sociolect or ethnolect) of African American children attending school, and thereby to facilitate the teaching of standard English.[10] Thereafter, Ebonics seems to have become little more than an alternative term for African American Vernacular English (q.v.), although one emphasizing its African roots and its independence from English, linked with the fuss over the decision by the Oakland School Board, and avoided by most linguists.[11]
[edit]Notes
^ For Williams's background as a writer on issues related to IQ, see Baugh 2000, 16. Baugh also flatly states (2000, 18) that "Williams is not a linguist".
^ Williams 1997; qtd Baugh 2000, 2. Conference details: Baugh, 2000, 15.
^ Williams 1975, vi; qtd Green 2002, 7, and qtd Baugh 2000, 15. Unfortunately there is something amiss with each reproduction of what Williams writes, and also possible incompatibility between the two. Green has a couple of what appear to be minor typing errors (whether Williams's or her own, and anyway corrected above following Baugh) but otherwise presents the text as above: an unexplained quotation ("the linguistic and paralinguistic features...black people") within the larger quotation. Baugh does not present the material outside this inner quotation but instead presents the latter (not demarcated by quotation marks) within a different context. He describes this as part of a statement to the US Senate made at some unspecified time after 1993, yet also attributes it (or has Williams attribute part of it) to p.vi of Williams's book.
^ For example Smith 1998, 55–7; qtd in Green 2002, 7–8.
^ Baugh 2000, 19.
^ Baugh 2000, 74–5.
^ Williams 1975 and 1997; Blackshire-Belay 1996.
^ The equivalent, Tolliver-Weddington 1979; the antonym, Smith 1992 and 1998; both as summarized in Baugh's words.
^ Baugh 2002, 12, citing O'Neil 1998.
^ Green 2002, 222. Its use in the context of education in reading, often involving the pedagogic approach called phonics, may have helped mislead people into thinking that the phonics from which the word Ebonics is derived has this meaning.
^ For linguists' reasons for this avoidance, see for example Green 2000, 7–8.
[edit]References
Baugh, John. 2000. Beyond Ebonics: Linguistic pride and racial prejudice. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-512046-9 (hard), ISBN 0-19-515289-1 (paper).
Blackshire-Belay, Carol Aisha. 1996. "The location of Ebonics within the framework of the Afrocological paradigm." Journal of Black Studies 27 (no 1), 5–23.
Green, Lisa J. 2002. African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-81449-9 (hard), ISBN 0-521-89138-8 (paper).
O'Neil, Wayne. 1998. "If Ebonics isn't a language, then tell me, what is?" In Theresa Perry and Lisa Delpit, eds.
Perry, Theresa, and Lisa Delpit, eds. 1998. The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African-American children. Boston: Beacon. ISBN 0807031453.
Smith, Ernie. 1992. "African American learning behavior: A world of difference." In Philip H. Dreywer, ed., Reading the World: Multimedia and multicultural learning in today's classroom. Claremont, Calif.: Claremont Reading Conference.
Smith, Ernie. 1998. "What is Black English? What is Ebonics?" In Theresa Perry and Lisa Delpit, eds.
Tolliver-Weddington, Gloria, ed. 1979. Ebonics (Black English): Implications for Education. Special issue of Journal of Black Studies 9 (no 4).
Williams, Robert. 1997. "Ebonics as a bridge to standard English." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, January 28, p.14.
Williams, Robert, ed. 1975. Ebonics: The true language of black folks. St Louis, Mo.: Institute of Black Studies / Robert Williams and Associates. (Green 2002 and the Library of Congress online catalog say IBS, Baugh 2000 says RW&A.).
[edit]External links
Baugh, John. "American varieties: African American English: Ebony + Phonics". PBS, 2005.
Patrick, Peter L. "Answers to some Questions about 'Ebonics' (African American English)". University of Essex.
Ebonics discussion on LINGUIST List
Ebonics is bogus man.It's a proper way of saying slave toungue. Nobody's telling you to do anything Dutch.I used the white kid mex-foood as an example , it can be any race. And who said fuck the white man at all costs? It's about ignorance , and any race can harbor that.Blacks included.
If anything , we need more non black brothers like you in the game , you do it the right way , with respect and decency , and people speak highly of you (myself included) even if we don't see eye to eye on everything.
I think this is just a thread where everyone on here is firm believer in whatever it is we believe in, I'm not gonna change my mind because of anybody who disagrees with me.But I'm not going to downplay what I know to be the truth either.
As I keep saying , the point is to work together on what we do agree on , and respect each others differences.
People do tell me I lost my mind though.....wonder why?..oh well
check you're email man!lol
