R.I.P...Bill of Rights!?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 4, 2005
3,544
1,180
113
38
#42
@ rasan

i know theyre labeling it as for 'terrorists' but all these bill changes sound like its meant for regular citizens.

like they know damn well we aint getting attacked by nobody.. they just using that excuse to take away our rights. just like they did wit the patriot act.
 

WXS STOMP3R

SENIOR GANG MEMBER
Feb 27, 2006
6,313
1,455
113
49
#43
WHEN SPAIN HAD THOSE BOMBINGS IN THEIR SUBWAYS AFTER 9/11.
THEY DIDNT IMPLEMENT NEW LAWS AS STIFF AS THE PATRIOT ACT. THEY JUST ADAPTED THEIR STRATEGIES.
MATTER OF FACT WE COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11 WITH THE LAWS THAT WERE IN PLACE ALREADY.
THERE WAS NO REASON FOR THE PATRIOT ACT.
 

Rasan

Producer
May 17, 2002
19,730
24,634
113
45
Chula Vista, South Bay, San Diego, California
#44
@ rasan

i know theyre labeling it as for 'terrorists' but all these bill changes sound like its meant for regular citizens.

like they know damn well we aint getting attacked by nobody.. they just using that excuse to take away our rights. just like they did wit the patriot act.
Exactly brother. U r right. It is for us citizens.
 

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
45
#46
because most americans only care about 2 and a half men and when their pizza delivery order is showing up

i told you, were a country blinded by illusions of safety, so we are oblivious to it that we've dug ourselves a nice deep hole and jumped in head first with no way out

sadly, that is correct.

both our governments have tight control on the populace.
 
Mar 11, 2011
1,946
54
0
40
#47
I think the question is, how were revolutions possible last year in those countries and why does it seem less likely to happen in the US?
Answer:

Those countries don't offer many freedoms and through reality-distortion had kept their citizens in the dark about how shit actually happens in the rest of the world for a long time.
The cover was blown off the Truman Show style operations these governments were running and people were pissed. Pissed enough to militia up in some cases and get shit poppin.


We have too many freedoms here and until shit actually changes people day-to-day lives ain't no1 gonna give a shit except people postin on the internet in their Sponge Bob bathrobs talkin about rallying but never leavin the house.
 

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
45
#53
Answer:

Those countries don't offer many freedoms and through reality-distortion had kept their citizens in the dark about how shit actually happens in the rest of the world for a long time.
The cover was blown off the Truman Show style operations these governments were running and people were pissed. Pissed enough to militia up in some cases and get shit poppin.


We have too many freedoms here and until shit actually changes people day-to-day lives ain't no1 gonna give a shit except people postin on the internet in their Sponge Bob bathrobs talkin about rallying but never leavin the house.
The internet played the biggest role in the arab spring.

Need to take into account also that members of the armed forces switched sides, I just don't see that EVER happening in the West regardless.
 
Mar 11, 2011
1,946
54
0
40
#59
The internet played the biggest role in the arab spring.

Need to take into account also that members of the armed forces switched sides, I just don't see that EVER happening in the West regardless.
That was the point of my post that the internet has allowed coordination and assimilation with the rest of the world. People are tired of being hella oppressed. The internet has opened the eyes of people in the third world and prompted them into action and social and civil unrest.

LOL in America the internet has done the opposite in the non-commercial sector. Instead the internet prompts people to watch cat videos, beat off and never leave the house in that order