new cover

[mosexclusive]

I havent posted a mixtape cover here in a while....I know this style of covers isnt usually done by some of the other mixtape designers on this board....im workin on a new effect on the cuts of the artists....tell me what yall think

 

[lil_wattage]

Thats clean man

 

[cheeto]

dumb ass clean

 

[Mr. Samos]

I think it's rough. Over-exposed. Rushed. Sketchy.

It's really, really bad.

The only parts I'm feeling are the untouched type, because, they haven't been touched, lol.

Peace.

 

[threexkrzy]

looks good, ur right u dont usually see covers like that on here

 

[RAVAGE]

iiii

 

[mosexclusive]

updated version, changed the main text and toned down the light

 

[mosexclusive]

I think it's rough. Over-exposed. Rushed. Sketchy.

It's really, really bad.

The only parts I'm feeling are the untouched type, because, they haven't been touched, lol.

Peace.

I kinda dont know what you mean by most of what you said....it definitely wasnt rushed though....Over-exposed is something you would say about a photo, never heard that be said about a mixtape.....and sketchy, I just dont know what you mean by that.....And as I said earlier youre prolly not used to these type of covers, so YOU would think it was really really bad but by mixtape standards this isnt by any means a bad cover

 

[threexkrzy]

updated version, changed the main text and toned down the light

I ACTUALLY LIKED THE FIRST ONE BETTER, MAYBE I WOULDVE KEPT THE ORIGINAL FONT ON R&B BUT NOT EMBOSSED AND SAME GRADIENT EFFECT

 

[azryda420]

I like the first one better. the letters stood out more. good work.

 

[underground]

1ST ONE WAS BETTER IMO...CLEAN THO MAYNE. I DO THE SAME STYLE COVERS...

 

[INCHEZ]

2nd one looks dope to me... maybe if you take off the transparency in the title,the letters might pop out a bit more....

Both are clean thou, nice work